본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

법률 기계번역 포스트에디팅에 대한 경험과 인식에 관한 소고: 번역사와 전공생 면접조사를 중심으로

An Interview-Based Study on Translators’ and Translator Trainees’ Experiences with Legal Machine Translation Post-Editing and Their Perspectives.

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

This paper addresses the perspectives of professional translators and translator trainees regarding Korean-English machine translation post-editing in comparison with human translation and revision. Six professional legal translators and six translator trainees participated in interviews one-on-one after completing two tasks for research purposes: translating Korean legal texts from scratch and post-editing DeepL machine translation outputs. Research participants generally agreed that machine translation quality was acceptable for moderately difficult Korean legislative texts. Participants mentioned some challenges in post-editing, including perceived difficulties regardless of the post-editing guidelines, such as deciding the scope of revisions, selecting legal terminology, and in comparing the original text with the machine-translated text for the purpose of identifying necessary changes. However, post-editing was reported to save cognitive load and time for draft translation. Both professionals and trainees had a positive outlook on the usage of machine translation for legal translation, but also voiced concerns about the potential impact on translators' roles and job prospects. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating technological advances into translation training and practice, and of reevaluating the role of translators.

Abstract

This paper addresses the perspectives of professional translators and translator trainees regarding Korean-English machine translation post-editing in comparison with human translation and revision. Six professional legal translators and six translator trainees participated in interviews one-on-one after completing two tasks for research purposes: translating Korean legal texts from scratch and post-editing DeepL machine translation outputs. Research participants generally agreed that machine translation quality was acceptable for moderately difficult Korean legislative texts. Participants mentioned some challenges in post-editing, including perceived difficulties regardless of the post-editing guidelines, such as deciding the scope of revisions, selecting legal terminology, and in comparing the original text with the machine-translated text for the purpose of identifying necessary changes. However, post-editing was reported to save cognitive load and time for draft translation. Both professionals and trainees had a positive outlook on the usage of machine translation for legal translation, but also voiced concerns about the potential impact on translators' roles and job prospects. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating technological advances into translation training and practice, and of reevaluating the role of translators.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. 강수정, "전문번역사들의 NMT에 대한 인식과 수용에 관한 연구-심층인터뷰를 중심으로", 번역학연구, 21(3), pp.9~35 (2020)
  2. 강수정, "통번역대학원생들의 기계번역 사용현황과 인식에 관한 연구", 번역학연구, 22(3), pp.41~63 (2021)
  3. 김순미, "신경망번역기(NMT)활용 학부 번역교육의 가능성 연구", 통번역교육연구, 15(3), pp.5~37 (2017)
  4. 김순미, "번역 교육 지원 도구로서 기계번역(MT)활용-한영번역 포스트에디팅(MTPE)수행에 대한 학습자 태도를 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 25(4), pp.51~80 (2021)
  5. 마승혜, "한영 기계번역 포스트 에디팅에 대한 경험적 고찰 : 학부 교육 과정및 결과를 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 22(1), pp.63~87 (2018)
  6. 명선혜, "전문 번역사의 MTPE 인식 전환 가능성 모색-아비투스 개념을 중심으로", 번역학연구, 21(3), pp.37~60 (2020)
  7. 박혜경, "석사 과정의 기계번역 수업에 대한 소고 : 한일번역 전공생의 포스트에디팅 사례를 통하여", 번역학연구, 19(3), pp.163~193 (2018)
  8. 신지선, "테크놀로지 패러다임에서의 번역능력 재조명", 통번역학연구, 21(4), pp.51~71 (2017)
  9. 이상빈, "국내학부 번역전공자의 구글 기계번역 포스트에디팅 과정(process)및 행위 연구", 번역학연구, 19(3), pp.259~286 (2018)
  10. 이선우, "기계번역 사용, 기계번역 교육, 번역가 진로에 관한 인식 조사: 학부번역전공자를 대상으로 한 소규모 설문조사를 기반으로", 통역과번역, 25(1), pp.49~73 (2023)
  11. 이주리애, "포스트에디팅의 번역사 수용에 관한 예비연구-한일 기계번역을중심으로", 통번역학연구, 25(3), pp.109~140 (2021)
  12. 이지민, "통번역대학원 번역 전공 학습자의 기계번역 활용 양상 및 인식에 대한 질적연구", 번역학연구, 24(3), pp.249~283 (2023)
  13. 이지은, "인공신경망 기반 맞춤형 기계번역엔진의 성능 평가 : 법률및 특허 한영번역 결과물 평가 사례를 중심으로", 번역학연구, 24(1), pp.9~37 (2023)
  14. 이지은, "인간번역과 기계번역 및 포스트에디팅 결과물의 오류 비교 : 한영 법률 번역 사례를 중심으로", 번역학연구, 25(1), pp.11~39 (2024)
  15. 지윤주, "학부번역전공자의 챗GPT 관련 인식과 챗GPT 번역및 포스트에디팅 실험 연구", 통번역학연구, 27(3), pp.203~226 (2023)
  16. 천종성, "전문번역사들의 기계번역 수용에 관한 연구", 한국융합학회논문지, 11(6), pp.281~288 (2020)
  17. Aranberri, N., "Comparison of post-editing productivity between professional translators and lay users", Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas, pp.20~33 (2014), Association for Machine Translation in the Americas
  18. Cadwell, P., "Human factors in machine translation and post-editing among institutional translators", Translation Spaces, 5(2), pp.222~243 (2016)
  19. Cadwell, P., "Resistance and accommodation : Factors for the(non-)adoption of machine translation among professional translators", Perspectives, 26(3), pp.301~321 (2018)
  20. Doherty, S., "Mapping the industry I: Findings on translation technologies and quality assessment" (2013), GALA
  21. Doherty, S., "Translations the impact of translation technologies on the process and product of translation", International journal of communication, 10, pp.947~969 (2016)
  22. "European Language Industry Survey 2022: Trends, Expectations and Concerns of the European Language Industry" (2022)[URL]
  23. "2017 Language Industry Survey–Expectations and Concerns of the European Language Industry" (2017)[URL]
  24. Flanagan, M., "Testing post-editing guidelines : How translation trainees interpret them and how to tailor them for translator training purposes", The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 8(2), pp.257~275 (2014)
  25. Gaspari, F., "A survey of machine translation competences : Insights for translation technology educators and practitioners", Perspectives, 23(3), pp.333~358 (2015)
  26. Guerberof-Arenas, A., "What do professional translators think about post-editing?", The Journal of Specialised Translation, 19, pp.75~95 (2013)
  27. Jakobsen, A. L., "Moving Boundaries in Translation Studies", pp.64~80 (2019), Routledge
  28. Jia, Y., "How does the post-editing of neural machine translation compare with from-scratch translation? A product and process study", The Journal of Specialised Translation, 31, pp.60~86 (2019)
  29. Killman, J., "Post-editing vs. translating in the legal context : Quality and time effects from English to Spanish", Revista de Llengua i Dret, 78, pp.56~72 (2022)
  30. Koehn, P., "Interactive assistance to human translators using statistical machine translation methods", Proceedings of Machine Translation Summit XII: Papers (2009)
  31. Lagoudaki, E., "The value of machine translation for the professional translator", Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas: Student Research Workshop, pp.262~269 (2008), Association for Machine Translation in the Americas
  32. LeBlanc, M., "Human Issues in Translation Technology", pp.45~62 (2017), Routledge
  33. Lee, J., "A case study on the evaluation of Korean-English legal translations by generic and custom neural machine translation engines", Interpretation and Translation, 25(1), pp.75~98 (2023)
  34. Lee, J., "The quality and productivity of post-edited machine translation in comparison with human translation : A case of Korean-English legal translation", Interpretation and Translation, 26(1) (2024)
  35. Lesznyák, Á., "Hungarian translators’ perceptions of neural machine translation in the European Commission", Proceedings of MT Summit XVII: Translator, Project and User Tracks, pp.16~22 (2019), European Association for Machine Translation
  36. Moorkens, J., "Post-editing evaluations: Trade-offs between novice and professional participants", Proceedings of European Association for Machine Translation (EAMT), pp.75~81 (2015), European Association for Machine Translation
  37. O'Brien, S., "Teaching post-editing: A proposal for course content", Proceedings of the 6th EAMT Workshop: Teaching Machine Translation, pp.99~106 (2002), European Association for Machine Translation
  38. O'Brien, S., "The Handbook of Translation and Cognition", pp.311~331 (2017), Wiley-Blackwell
  39. Plitt, M., "A productivity test of statistical machine translation post-editing in a typical localization context", Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics, 93, pp.7~16 (2010)
  40. Pym, A., "Translation skill-sets in a machine-translation age", Meta, 58(3), pp.479~672 (2013)
  41. Rojo, J. J. L., "Aspects of human translation : The current situation and an emerging trend. Hermēneus", Revista de traducción e interpretación, 20, pp.257~294 (2018)
  42. Rossi, C., "Uses and perceptions of machine translation at the European Commission", The Journal of Specialised Translation, 31, pp.177~200 (2019)
  43. Sakamoto, A., "Why do many translators resist post-editing? A sociological analysis using Bourdieu’s concepts", The Journal of Specialised Translation, 31, pp.201~216 (2019)
  44. Schmitt, P. A., "Translation 4. 0–evolution, revolution, innovation or disruption?", Lebende Sprachen, 64(2), pp.193~229 (2019)
  45. Svoboda, T., "Institutional Translator Training", pp.73~91 (2023), Routledge
  46. Teixeira, C. S. C., "Investigating the cognitive ergonomic aspects of translation tools in a workplace setting", Translation Spaces, 6(1), pp.79~103 (2017)
  47. Vieira, L. N., "Machine translation in society : Insights from UK users", Language Resources and Evaluation, 57(2), pp.893~914 (2023)
  48. Yamada, M., "Can college students be post-editors? An investigation into employing language learners in machine translation plus post-editing settings", Machine Translation, 29(1), pp.49~67 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)