본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

교원양성교육과정과 교원임용후보자 선정경쟁시험에 나타난 중등수학교사에게 요구되는 지식 분석: 교수를 위한 내용 지식을 중심으로

An Analysis of the Expected Content Knowledge for Teaching in Teacher Education Programs and Teacher Employment Tests for Secondary Mathematics

0

조회

0

다운로드

14

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

본 연구는 교원양성과정과 교원임용후보자 선정경쟁시험 (이하 교원임용시험)에서 중등수학교사에게 어떤 교수를 위 한 내용지식(content knowledge for teaching)을 요구하는지 탐색함으로써 향후 교원양성 및 선발에 의미 있는 시사점을 얻고 자 한다. 이를 위해 국내 21개 사범대학 수학교육과의 교육과정과 12개년 교원임용시험 문항을 분석한 결과, 사범대학 수학 교육과 교육과정에서 모두 교과교육학이 교과내용학에 비해 여전히 비중이 낮은 편으로 그 비율은 학교마다 다소 차이가 있 지만 평균적으로 교과내용학이 교과교육학의 2.67배에 달하는 것으로 나타났다. 기본이수교과목이 10개 교과내용학과 1개 교 과교육학 과목으로 구성되어 있는 것과도 무관하지 않지만 대체로 교과교육학의 비중이 상대적으로 매우 낮음을 알 수 있 다. 또한 12개년 교원임용시험을 분석한 결과 시험체제 변화에 따라 조금씩 차이가 있기는 하지만 전체적으로 교과내용지식 의 비중이 교수학적 내용지식보다 현저히 높았으며 특정 지식 유형에 편중되는 현상을 보이고 있었다. 그러나 중등 수학과 교육과정의 변화에 따라 교원임용시험 문항에서 요구하는 지식 역시 단순한 기억과 이해보다는 적용, 분석, 평가를 기반으 로 하는 고차원적인 실천적 지식으로 변화하고 있는 긍정적인 측면도 있었다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 미래사회의 변화에 재 빠르게 대응하고 적응할 수 있는 교사를 양성하고 선발할 수 있는 교사교육에의 시사점을 얻었다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate what content knowledge for teaching is expected for secondary mathematics teachers in teacher education programs and teacher employment tests. By using the framework developed by Ball, Thames, and Phelps (2008), we analyzed the required courses in 21 teacher education programs for secondary mathematics and test items in teacher employment tests between 2006 and 2017. As a result, we found that subject matter knowledge was more dominant than pedagogical content knowledge in both teacher education programs and teacher employment tests. Even for the pedagogical content knowledge represented in teacher employment tests, there were more items for knowledge of content and teaching than those for the other two different types of knowledge. We also noticed that the items required more higher-order thinking and practical knowledge. Along with the 2015 revised national curriculum, teacher preparation programs and teacher employment tests have shifted to respond to social changes and educational needs. This study gives meaningful implications for future teacher education and teacher recruitment.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Ball, D. L., "The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education", Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), pp.497~511 (2009)
  2. Ball,D.L, "Content knowledge for teaching:What makes it special?", Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), pp.389~407 (2008)
  3. Baumert, J., "Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress", American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), pp.133~180 (2010)
  4. Blomeke, S., "Assessment of teacher knowledge across countries : A review of the state of research", ZDM, 44(3), pp.223~247 (2012)
  5. Boyd, D., "Teacher preparation and student achievement", Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), pp.416~440 (2009)
  6. Buitink, J., "What and how do student teachers learn during school-based teacher education", Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, pp.118~127 (2009)
  7. Cochran-Smith, M., "Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring issues in changing contexts", pp.1009~1016 (2008), Routledge
  8. Darling-Hammond, L., "Teacher quality and student achievement : A review of state policy evidence", Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), pp.1~44 (2000)
  9. Darling-Hammond, L., "Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do" (2005), Jossey-Bass
  10. Edwards, A., "Constructing curriculum subject knowledge in primary school teacher training", Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(7), pp.735~747 (1998)
  11. Grossman, P. L., "Learning to teach without teacher education", Teachers College Record, 91, pp.191~207 (1989)
  12. Grossman, P. L., "The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education" (1990), Teachers College Press
  13. Grossman, P. L., "Unacknowledged knowledge growth : A re-examination of the effects of teacher education", Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), pp.53~62 (1988)
  14. 한혜정, "미국 뉴욕 주 교원임용 중등 교수역량 지필평가가 우리나라 교원임용시험에 주는 시사점 탐색", 한국교육, 39(2), pp.129~155 (2012), 한국교육개발원
  15. Hiebert J., "Relationships between mathematics teacher preparation and graduates’analyses of classroom teaching", The Elementary School Journal, 117(4), pp.687~707 (2017)
  16. Hill, H. C., "Effects of teachers’mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement", American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), pp.371~406 (2005)
  17. 전영미, "초.중등 임용고시에 나타난 교사지식기반 분석 연구", 한국교원교육연구, 26(3), pp.461~489 (2009), 한국교원교육학회
  18. 2011modularization of Korea's development experience: Successful strategy for training teachers in Korean education, "Korean Educational Development Institute", Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology, ~ (2012)
  19. "Secondaryteacher employment test" (2016)[URL]
  20. Krauss, S., "Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers", Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), pp.716~725 (2008)
  21. Kukla-Acevedo, S., "Do teacher characteristics matter? New results on the effects of teacher preparation on student achievement", Economics of Education Review, 28, pp.49~57 (2009)
  22. Design of the competencies-based national curriculum for the future society, "Lee, K.", Korean Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation, ~, pp.Report RRC 2012-4 (2012)
  23. A study on developing key competencies in the primary, "secondary school curriculum for the future of Koreans(?) :Focused on the establishing sub-domains and components for key competencies", Lee, K., 2008, Report RRC 2008-7-1
  24. Ministry of Education, "National guidelines for the elementary and secondary curriculum", Ministry of Education, ~ (1997)
  25. Ministry of Education, "National guidelines for the elementary and secondary curriculum", Ministry of Education, ~ (2007)
  26. Ministry of Education, "National guidelines for the elementary and secondary curriculum", Ministry of Education, ~ (2015)
  27. Ministry of Education, "The guidebook for certifications of teachers" (2017), Ministry of Education
  28. Morris, A. K., "Effects of teacher preparation courses: Do graduates use what they learned to plan mathematics lessons?", American Educational Research Journal, 54(3), pp.524~567 (2017)
  29. Rice, J. K., "Teacher quality: Understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes" (2003), Economic Policy Institute
  30. Ronfeldt, M., "More or better student teaching?", Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), pp.1091~1106 (2012)
  31. Schwab, J. J., "The structure of knowledge and the curriculum", pp.6~30 (1964), Rand McNally
  32. Shin, H., "The issues and improvements of the teacher recruitment system", The Korean Journal for Human Resource Development, 9(2), pp.61~81 (2007)
  33. Shulman, L. S., "Those who understand : Knowledge growth in teaching", Educational Researcher, 15, pp.4~14 (1986)
  34. Shulman, L. S., "Knowledge and teaching : Foundations of the new reform", Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), pp.1~22 (1987)
  35. Tang, S. Y. F., "Challenge and support : The dynamics of student teachers’ professional learning in the field experience", Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, pp.483~498 (2003)
  36. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, "Draft strategy paper on key competencies :A frame of reference for a coherent assessment program" (2002), The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
  37. Wayne, A. J., "Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review", Review of Educational Research, 73(1), pp.89~122 (2003)
  38. Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations, "Wilson, S.", Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, ~, pp.Research report R-01-3 (2001)
  39. Current status and future prospects of education in Korea (I): KICE agenda for the future society and the changing demographics of school aged population, "Yi, H.", Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation, ~, pp.RRO 2016-4 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)