조선전기 한성부 가옥 철거와 정부의 보상실태
A Study on the Aspects of Removing Dwellings in Hanseongbu and Followed Compensation in the Former Period of Joseon
1
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article examines the Hanseongbu removal policy in the former period of Joseon as part of the measure to understand spatial reorganization around the infrastructure construction of the city. The government’s removal policy in the former period of Joseon was conducted for various purposes like to temple removal in the capital city according to the policy of worshiping Confucianism, eliminate houses suppressing the main range of the castle or the Royal Sanctuary, remove houses near the castle or official residences for preventing fire, or get rid of houses to build residences for the royal family. The government’s such removal policy in the former period of Joseon has the following characteristics. First, the demolition policy of early Joseon government exhibited periodical changes and local characteristics. The purpose of housing demolitions pushed ahead by government before Sejo's era is in building housings for prince and princess, government buildings, road and also in making space to prevent fire, on the other hand, the demolition after Sungjong's era, demolition policy had in its goal in tearing down the housings that obstruct the vitality of palace based on the theory of divination based on topography. Open space were compensated for the residents of demolished housings until 1502, however, rice or clothes were compensated for market value of demolished housings after 1502. Second, with removing the houses of suppression or residences in tabooed places, the space surrounding the castle was organized into tabooed space, not residential space. The government’s such removal policy was for protecting symbolicity of the castle rather than for enhancing efficiency of the urban space. Third, it resulted in reorganization of the space in Hanseongbu and expansion of the urban space. Although the government’s reward policy for the homeless in the former period of Joseon was principled to give them some vacant land in Hanseongbu, it, in fact, provided them with vacant land outside the capital city like outside Sugumun or Namdaemun for the lack of residential space in Hanseongbu, and it led to the city space expansion or reorganization. As described above, the government’s dwelling removal in the former period of Joseon was oriented to highlighting premodern duality of the reasonability of city organization, feng-shui, and royal authority and the symbolicity of the city. The chief idea for that spatial removal was based on the logic of geomantic studies. The geomantic studies’ idea of spatial removal had bigger impact on highlighting the symbolicity of the city rather than enhancing efficiency of the city operation in the removal policy for Hanseongbu, the planned city. Removing houses of suppression and residences around tabooed places based on geomantic studies was to protect the symbolicity of royal authority, and the national removal in the former period of Joseon was not mere slum removal but aimed to establish space to highlight symbolicity of the city based on the discriminative and separate idea.
Abstract
This article examines the Hanseongbu removal policy in the former period of Joseon as part of the measure to understand spatial reorganization around the infrastructure construction of the city. The government’s removal policy in the former period of Joseon was conducted for various purposes like to temple removal in the capital city according to the policy of worshiping Confucianism, eliminate houses suppressing the main range of the castle or the Royal Sanctuary, remove houses near the castle or official residences for preventing fire, or get rid of houses to build residences for the royal family. The government’s such removal policy in the former period of Joseon has the following characteristics. First, the demolition policy of early Joseon government exhibited periodical changes and local characteristics. The purpose of housing demolitions pushed ahead by government before Sejo's era is in building housings for prince and princess, government buildings, road and also in making space to prevent fire, on the other hand, the demolition after Sungjong's era, demolition policy had in its goal in tearing down the housings that obstruct the vitality of palace based on the theory of divination based on topography. Open space were compensated for the residents of demolished housings until 1502, however, rice or clothes were compensated for market value of demolished housings after 1502. Second, with removing the houses of suppression or residences in tabooed places, the space surrounding the castle was organized into tabooed space, not residential space. The government’s such removal policy was for protecting symbolicity of the castle rather than for enhancing efficiency of the urban space. Third, it resulted in reorganization of the space in Hanseongbu and expansion of the urban space. Although the government’s reward policy for the homeless in the former period of Joseon was principled to give them some vacant land in Hanseongbu, it, in fact, provided them with vacant land outside the capital city like outside Sugumun or Namdaemun for the lack of residential space in Hanseongbu, and it led to the city space expansion or reorganization. As described above, the government’s dwelling removal in the former period of Joseon was oriented to highlighting premodern duality of the reasonability of city organization, feng-shui, and royal authority and the symbolicity of the city. The chief idea for that spatial removal was based on the logic of geomantic studies. The geomantic studies’ idea of spatial removal had bigger impact on highlighting the symbolicity of the city rather than enhancing efficiency of the city operation in the removal policy for Hanseongbu, the planned city. Removing houses of suppression and residences around tabooed places based on geomantic studies was to protect the symbolicity of royal authority, and the national removal in the former period of Joseon was not mere slum removal but aimed to establish space to highlight symbolicity of the city based on the discriminative and separate idea.
참고문헌 (13)
- "朝鮮王朝實錄(太宗-中宗)"
- "經國大典"
- "新增東國輿地勝覽"
- 김범, "朝鮮 燕山君代의 王權과 政局運營", 대동문화연구, (53), pp.255~307 (2006), 대동문화연구원
- 金燉, "燕山君代의 君臣 權力關係와 그 推移", 역사교육, 53 (1993)
- 金源模, "含春苑考-宮闕 臨壓家舍의 撤去를 中心으로", 향토서울, 22 (1964)
- 박경안, "선초 가대(家代)의 절급에 관하여", 역사와 현실, (69), pp.225~254 (2008), 한국역사연구회
- 류승희, "조선초기 漢城府의 화재발생과 禁火都監의 운영", 서울학연구, (19), pp.1~39 (2002), 서울학연구소
- 유승희, "15∼16세기 漢城府의 주택 문제와 정부의 대응", 사학연구, (94), pp.37~76 (2009), 한국사학회
- 李燦, "都城圖, In 서울의 옛지도" (1994), 서울학연구소
- 이봉춘, "조선 成宗朝의 儒敎政治와 排佛政策", 불교학보, 28 (1991)
- 정동일, "燕山君 禁標碑 硏究; 大慈洞 禁標碑를 中心으로", 漢城史學, 8 (1996)
- 허영록, "조선시대 도시계획의 기본요소로서 시전에 대한 연구", 서울학연구, (6) (1995)
