1930년대 楊開道의 향촌건설방안과 ‘中國 鄕約制度’ 연구
A Study on a Method of Rural Construction by Yang Kaidao in 1930s and ‘Chinese Township Regulations’
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this article I focus on the mechanism of action between the intellectuals and the modern knowledge imported from the West which is inherent in the study of Chinese township regulations, maintaining the same perspective as the previous studies suggesting that Yang Kai Dao's research on township regulations is a part of rural sociology research. Yang Kai Dao argued the rural autonomy should be established to solve the plights in rural areas. While he contemplated the function of rural institutions through which rural autonomy could have been realized, His focus of research extended to the Chinese township regulations system. His study on the Chinese township regulations was to examine the rural autonomy in China historically from the perspective of rural governance. He analyzed the township regulations in terms of the modern organizational theory and pointed out civil administration over the bureaucracy as the essence. He highly appreciated the civilian character led by the intellectual elite of the Lushi township regulations, so it was inevitable that he criticized their corruption. By referring to the process in which Liang Shuming's rural construction movement was put into practice, he contemplated how to apply township regulations and insisted that organizations should be combined so as not to stay in theory. He believed that through education and the conscious efforts of the community it was possible to instill awareness of civil rights in farmers. He also believed that and rural leaders who play important roles in self-governing rural organizations should also have modern knowledge and a basic understanding on rural autonomy. Throughout his research on township, I couldless that he thought the modern learning from the West was needed for rural autonomy. Thus, it was validated that the mechanism for spreading modern knowledge through the rural village construction movement was functioning in Yang Kai Dao's village construction plan.
Abstract
In this article I focus on the mechanism of action between the intellectuals and the modern knowledge imported from the West which is inherent in the study of Chinese township regulations, maintaining the same perspective as the previous studies suggesting that Yang Kai Dao's research on township regulations is a part of rural sociology research. Yang Kai Dao argued the rural autonomy should be established to solve the plights in rural areas. While he contemplated the function of rural institutions through which rural autonomy could have been realized, His focus of research extended to the Chinese township regulations system. His study on the Chinese township regulations was to examine the rural autonomy in China historically from the perspective of rural governance. He analyzed the township regulations in terms of the modern organizational theory and pointed out civil administration over the bureaucracy as the essence. He highly appreciated the civilian character led by the intellectual elite of the Lushi township regulations, so it was inevitable that he criticized their corruption. By referring to the process in which Liang Shuming's rural construction movement was put into practice, he contemplated how to apply township regulations and insisted that organizations should be combined so as not to stay in theory. He believed that through education and the conscious efforts of the community it was possible to instill awareness of civil rights in farmers. He also believed that and rural leaders who play important roles in self-governing rural organizations should also have modern knowledge and a basic understanding on rural autonomy. Throughout his research on township, I couldless that he thought the modern learning from the West was needed for rural autonomy. Thus, it was validated that the mechanism for spreading modern knowledge through the rural village construction movement was functioning in Yang Kai Dao's village construction plan.
참고문헌 (41)
- 楊開道, "農村社會學" (1929), 世界書局
- 楊開道, "農村自治" (1930), 世界書局
- 楊開道, "農村組織" (1930), 世界書局
- 楊開道, "農村問題" (1930), 上海世界書局
- 楊開道, "農村社會" (1930), 世界書局
- 楊開道, "農村領袖" (1930), 世界書局
- 楊開道, "農村政策" (1934), 世界書局
- 楊開道, "中國鄉約制度" (1937), 山東省鄉村建設研究院
- 楊開道, "梁漱溟村治七難解", 農業周報 (1929)
- 楊開道, "鄉約制度的研究", 社會學界 (1931)
- 楊開道, "呂新吾的鄉甲約制度", 社會學界 (1934)
- 鄭大華, "民國鄉村建設運動" (2000), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 송정수, "중국근세향촌사회사연구-명청시대 향약, 보갑제 형성과 전개" (1997), 혜안
- 王欣瑞, "現代化視野下的民國鄉村建設思想研究", 博士, pp.2007
- 胡曉婷, "鄕約制度與農村自治-楊開道的農村社區工作模式", 碩士, pp.2015
- 黨曉虹, "傳統鄉規民約的曆史反思及其當代啟示鄉村精英、國家政權和農民互動的視角", 中國農史, (4) (2010)
- 常建華, "鄉約往事從楊開道《中國鄉約制度》說開去", 讀書, (9) (2016)
- 董建輝, "中國鄉村治理道路的曆史探索楊開道及其《中國鄉約制度》", 寧德師範學院學報, (4) (2016)
- 賀雪峰, "鄉村治理研究與村莊治理研究", 地方財政研究, (3) (2007)
- 侯俊丹, "鄉約改造與專家治理簡析楊開道的鄉村建設思想", 學術交流, (2) (2016)
- 胡煉剛, "梁漱溟與楊開道關於村治問題的討論", 中國社會科學報, (2) (2012)
- 李爽, "楊開道的鄉約研究與鄉村建設思想", 史學集刊, (7) (2008)
- 李爽, "20世紀二三十年代社會學者農村組織模式硏究", 北方論叢, (4) (2011)
- 劉鋒, "楊開道村治思想的異同及對鄉村振興之啟示", 邵陽學院學報, (5) (2019)
- 劉精明, "試評述楊開道農村組織理論", 社會學研究, (4) (1991)
- 劉志奇, "中國鄉規民約研究", 北京師範大學學報, (2) (2016)
- 馬威, "楊開道學術研究綜述", 華中農業大學學報(社會科學版), (80) (2009)
- 彭秀良, "民国时期的乡约再造实践", 中国社会工作, (3) (2020)
- 彭秀良, "民国乡约再造实践中的乡贤(上)", 中國社會工作, (4) (2020)
- 彭秀良, "民國鄕約再造實踐中的鄕賢(下)", 中國社會工作, (19) (2020)
- 邱澤奇, "楊開道先生與他的農村社會學工作", 社會學研究, (5) (1987)
- 邱澤奇, "村社會秩序的新格局:三秩並行以某地“鄉土人才職稱評定” 爲例", 國家行政學院學報, (5) (2015)
- 蘇海新, "論中國鄉村治理模式的曆史演進", 湖南師範大學社會科學學報, (6) (2015)
- 閻書欽, "民國學界對美國社會學理論的選擇與融會對民國時期社會學中國化一個惻面的考察", 近代史學刊, (10) (2013)
- 王麗惠, "鄉規民約與村治", 湘潭大學學報(哲學社會科學版), (3) (2017)
- 王先明, "從《東方雜志》看近代鄉村社會變遷近代中國鄉村史研究的視角及其他", 史學月刊, (12) (2004)
- 王先明, "20世紀前期中國鄉村社會建設路徑的曆史反思", 天津社會科學, (6) (2008)
- 吳麗娟, "楊開道的農村領袖思想及其當代價值", 福建質量管理, (1) (2017)
- 徐其龍, "民國時期楊開道與梁漱溟鄉約改造思想比較研究", 哈爾濱工業大學學報(社會科學版), (1) (2020)
- 宣朝慶, "百年鄉村建設的思想場域和制度選擇", 天津社會科學, (3) (2012)
- 俞飛, "千年鄉約是與非", 人民法院報 (2012)
