본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

김마리아(1892-1944)의 교육관 ― 실력양성론 형성과 구체화를 중심으로 ―

Kim Maria(1892-1944)’s View on Education — Focusing on the Formation and Concreteization of the Theory for Fostering Capacity —

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Kim Maria was a “female Korean independence activist” who devoted her whole life for the independence of Korea. She said that “I married with the independence of Korea” with confidence. To understand activities of Kim Maria who sought the ways for independence and put into practice in her whole life, this study aims at investigating traces of forming, changing and developing her theory for fostering capacity as the way for national salvation in her life. When she was young, Kim Maria grew up in the family who felt responsible for local community and in open home environment accepting Christianity. She expanded her responsibility to country and people as Japan invaded was realized. In her teens, she studied at Chungshin Girls’ School which cultivated the Christian education and the spirit of independence she met fighters for independence at “Kim Brothers Store” which was managed by her uncles, Kim Yuno and Kim Pilsoon. She also cured soldiers who were wounded in the protest against the dissolution of Korean Army in 1907 in Severance Hospital. Through these experiences, she decided to devote her life for Korean independence. During studying in Japan, she set up her resolute idea on the necessity of the education for women. She thought that education was essential to become “human” and women must be educated to be appropriate and helpful in Korea and committed to society. For Korean independence, she returned to Korea with the statement of the February 8th Independence Declaration and contributed to plan the March 1st Movement. However, she witnessed failures of the March 1st Movement and Korean Patriotic Women's Society in Korea and the division of Korean Provisional Government in Shanghai. She realized that fostering capacity could be base for independence and went study abroad to the United States of America. When she started her study in the U.S., she already decided to devote herself to Korean education and contribute to the independence and development of Korea. In the U.S., She strengthened her capacity by studying in Park University, Chicago University, Graduate School of Education in Columbia University and New York Theological Seminary. Through these studying and other experiences in the U.S., she developed her theory for fostering capacity to the stage that a individual citizen must effort to have his own leadership, choose leader and cooperate for the success of activities of that leader. She thought that a individual citizen must be the pivot of society. In her theory of fostering capacity, she had particular attention to the education for women. She had consciousness about the situation that a man was in center and a woman was excluded or in only auxiliary role. She thought that a woman was designated to be a “human” who can live freely. Her purpose of education for women was that a woman must go into the scene of missions of times equally with a man and stand as the independent subject of her own life and of the independence and development of her homeland. It meant that a woman must be the subject of independence beyond the auxiliary role. Kim Maria’s theory for fostering capacity was formed, changed and developed by her growth and having various experiences. The purpose of fostering capacity was not limited to the independence and expanded to the process of national development after independence. Her emphasis on education for women was not for only the liberation of women. She thought that men and women together must participate in the independence and development of nation. She did not leave her theory as only theory. After returning to Korea, she practiced her theory in teaching in Martha Wilson Seminary for Women and cultivated the spirit of independence.

Abstract

Kim Maria was a “female Korean independence activist” who devoted her whole life for the independence of Korea. She said that “I married with the independence of Korea” with confidence. To understand activities of Kim Maria who sought the ways for independence and put into practice in her whole life, this study aims at investigating traces of forming, changing and developing her theory for fostering capacity as the way for national salvation in her life. When she was young, Kim Maria grew up in the family who felt responsible for local community and in open home environment accepting Christianity. She expanded her responsibility to country and people as Japan invaded was realized. In her teens, she studied at Chungshin Girls’ School which cultivated the Christian education and the spirit of independence she met fighters for independence at “Kim Brothers Store” which was managed by her uncles, Kim Yuno and Kim Pilsoon. She also cured soldiers who were wounded in the protest against the dissolution of Korean Army in 1907 in Severance Hospital. Through these experiences, she decided to devote her life for Korean independence. During studying in Japan, she set up her resolute idea on the necessity of the education for women. She thought that education was essential to become “human” and women must be educated to be appropriate and helpful in Korea and committed to society. For Korean independence, she returned to Korea with the statement of the February 8th Independence Declaration and contributed to plan the March 1st Movement. However, she witnessed failures of the March 1st Movement and Korean Patriotic Women's Society in Korea and the division of Korean Provisional Government in Shanghai. She realized that fostering capacity could be base for independence and went study abroad to the United States of America. When she started her study in the U.S., she already decided to devote herself to Korean education and contribute to the independence and development of Korea. In the U.S., She strengthened her capacity by studying in Park University, Chicago University, Graduate School of Education in Columbia University and New York Theological Seminary. Through these studying and other experiences in the U.S., she developed her theory for fostering capacity to the stage that a individual citizen must effort to have his own leadership, choose leader and cooperate for the success of activities of that leader. She thought that a individual citizen must be the pivot of society. In her theory of fostering capacity, she had particular attention to the education for women. She had consciousness about the situation that a man was in center and a woman was excluded or in only auxiliary role. She thought that a woman was designated to be a “human” who can live freely. Her purpose of education for women was that a woman must go into the scene of missions of times equally with a man and stand as the independent subject of her own life and of the independence and development of her homeland. It meant that a woman must be the subject of independence beyond the auxiliary role. Kim Maria’s theory for fostering capacity was formed, changed and developed by her growth and having various experiences. The purpose of fostering capacity was not limited to the independence and expanded to the process of national development after independence. Her emphasis on education for women was not for only the liberation of women. She thought that men and women together must participate in the independence and development of nation. She did not leave her theory as only theory. After returning to Korea, she practiced her theory in teaching in Martha Wilson Seminary for Women and cultivated the spirit of independence.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. "대한매일신보", ~
  2. "동아일보", ~
  3. "조선일보", ~
  4. "독립신문", ~
  5. "신한민보", ~
  6. "한국YWCA", ~
  7. 김마리아, "여성교육론", 여자계, 3 (1918)
  8. 김마리아, "조선기독교여성운동", 종교시보 (1934)
  9. 김영순, "나의 동지, 김마리아선생", 나라사랑, 30 (1978)
  10. 배학복, "나의 어머니, 김마리아 선생", 나라사랑, 30 (1978)
  11. 송상도, "기려수필" (1971), 국사편찬위원회
  12. 신의경, "내가 아는 김마리아선생", 나라사랑, 30 (1978)
  13. Gilmore, G. W, "Korea from its Capital" (1892), The Presbyterian Board of Publication
  14. Kim, Maria C., "Initiative But Cooperative Leadership", The Korean Student Bulletin, pp.3~ (1931)
  15. 고춘섭, "연동교회 애국지사 16인 열전" (2009), 대한예수교장로회 연동교회
  16. 고춘섭, "하늘과 땅 사이에서-순원 신의경 권사 전기" (2001), 금영문화사
  17. 김영삼, "김마리아" (1983), 한국신학연구소
  18. 김옥선, "빛과 소금의 삶, 김마리아 생애", 주간시민, ~ (1978)
  19. 김필례, "중학 국어 III-II" (1966), 대한교과서주식회사
  20. 김필례, "회상의 학창시절(女流21人集)" (1973), 신서출판사
  21. 박용옥, "김마리아-나는 대한의 독립과 결혼하였다" (2003), 홍성사
  22. 박화성, "새벽에 외치다 : 송산 황신덕 선생의 사상과 생활" (1960), 휘문출판사
  23. 양현혜, "통일의 길, 한국 여성독립 운동에서 찾다" (2015), 정언
  24. 윤병석, "안창호 일대기" (1985), 역민사
  25. 이은상, "중학 국어 3-1" (1984), 대한교과서주식회사
  26. 정신백년사출판위원회, "정신100년사(상)" (1989), 정신여자중고등학교
  27. 김경일, "식민지 시기 신여성의 미국 체험과 문화 수용", 한국문화연구, 11 (2006)
  28. 김광자, "일제강점기 기독교여성지도력 유형 비교 연구: 김활란과 김마리아를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2017
  29. 김주용, "의사 김필순의 생애와 독립운동", 연세의사학, 21(1), pp.7~25 (2018), 의학사연구소[DOI]
  30. 김혜경, "김마리아의 민족주의 교육사상연구", 논문집, 1 (1981)
  31. 김호일, "기독교 교육가 김마리아 연구", 인문학연구, 36 (2003)
  32. 노영희, "김마리아, 민족혼에 대한 자각과 여성해방 운동", 한림일본학, 6 (2001)
  33. 유준기, "김마리아의 생애와 독립운동", 한국보훈논총, 8(1), pp.137~196 (2009), 한국보훈학회
  34. 이선용, "한국 초기 개신교와 여성교육 : 김활란과 김마리아를 중심으로", 석사, 신학과, pp.2013
  35. 이선이, "선각자 김마리아에 대한 선교적 조망", 선교신학, (44), pp.215~246 (2016), 한국선교신학회[DOI]
  36. 이영분, "근대 한국 미션스쿨의 여성교육과 한국 여성의 삶과 변화: 초기이화학당과 정신여학교를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2015
  37. 임영희, "루이스 맥컬리의 선교활동에 관한 연구", 석사, 역사신학, pp.2009
  38. 정경환, "제4장 김마리아의 구구투쟁과 독립정신에 관한 연구", 민족사상, 7(4), pp.99~136 (2013), 한국민족사상학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)