董煟의 『救荒活民書』와 救荒策
Dongwei董煟’s “Jiuhuanghuominshu救荒活民書” and famine relief policy
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is a review of the famine relief policy of “Jiuhuanghuominshu救荒活民書” compiled by Dongwei during the South Song period. Dongwei served as regional officials in various regions to relieve the famine. Through this experience, Dongwei felt the need for systematic relief and compiled the “Jiuhuanghuominshu”. This book is composed of three volumes and 拾遺. The first book is an example of the major famine relief from ancient times to the Song Dynasty, and the second book presented his own countermeasures and methodology for the relief of the famine. It consists of books and related discussions. The 拾遺 consisted of various discussions on famine relief and laws and regulations. The system of “Jiuhuanghuominshu” became a model for the compilation of professional “Huangzhengshu荒政書” in China afterwards, and it was introduced into Joseon朝鮮 and used to relieve famine. Dongwei suggested five core policies of “famine relief救荒”: ‘常平倉’, ‘義倉’, ‘勸分’, ‘禁遏糴’ and ‘抑價有禁.’ Among them, ‘常平’ and ‘義倉’ are systems that prepare for disasters such as famine. ‘常平’ was originally a function of price control, but it relieved alertness by releasing grain during famine. The ‘義倉’, which is led by the private sector to store grain, was evaluated as a ‘良法’ that can relieve people suffering from starvation in the right place. ‘勸分’ is a way to relieve famine by increasing the private food supply by encouraging wealthy people who can afford to supply grain at an appropriate price. ‘禁遏 糴’ means prohibiting interfering with local food exports during famine. This is to prevent the famine from worsening due to a kind of local egoism. ‘抑價有禁’ means that in a famine situation, grain prices in the market should not be suppressed or food prices should not be controlled at low prices. In other words, profits through appropriate prices must be guaranteed to induce local merchants to come and supply grain. In addition, ‘檢旱’ emphasizes the proper reporting of the famine damage by local authorities. ‘減租’ means that tax cuts should be given to farmers who suffered famine. ‘貸種’ means that hungry farmers should not be urged to lend and repay food. ‘恤農’ means that farmers should be treated preferentially over non-farmers, such as 遊手, when giving preference. ‘遣使’ emphasizes that local leaders should take responsibility and implement oral measures. ‘弛禁’ is to reduce the amount of money in the field. ‘治盜’ emphasizes strict response to thieves during famine. Besides, it is ‘捕蝗’, a corporation that catches grasshoppers. ‘通融有無’ is made in the same way as 借貸內庫 and 賑濟・賑糶・賑貸. ‘鬻爵’ and ‘度僧’ should be implemented only in an emergency while paying attention to side effects. In short, the characteristics of the famine relief plan shown in Dongwei’s “Jiuhuanghuominshu” is based on the traditional concept of ‘恤農’. In addition, it emphasizes the responsibility of local government officials. In addition, there is no fixed way to relieve famine, and it is said that it should be adapted to the condition of each region. Along with this, it values the self-regulated market ideology in famine relief policies such as ‘禁遏糴’ and ‘不抑價’. The same is true of the argument that the supply of grain will be smooth only when appropriate prices are guaranteed to wealthy people during the ‘勸分’.
Abstract
This paper is a review of the famine relief policy of “Jiuhuanghuominshu救荒活民書” compiled by Dongwei during the South Song period. Dongwei served as regional officials in various regions to relieve the famine. Through this experience, Dongwei felt the need for systematic relief and compiled the “Jiuhuanghuominshu”. This book is composed of three volumes and 拾遺. The first book is an example of the major famine relief from ancient times to the Song Dynasty, and the second book presented his own countermeasures and methodology for the relief of the famine. It consists of books and related discussions. The 拾遺 consisted of various discussions on famine relief and laws and regulations. The system of “Jiuhuanghuominshu” became a model for the compilation of professional “Huangzhengshu荒政書” in China afterwards, and it was introduced into Joseon朝鮮 and used to relieve famine. Dongwei suggested five core policies of “famine relief救荒”: ‘常平倉’, ‘義倉’, ‘勸分’, ‘禁遏糴’ and ‘抑價有禁.’ Among them, ‘常平’ and ‘義倉’ are systems that prepare for disasters such as famine. ‘常平’ was originally a function of price control, but it relieved alertness by releasing grain during famine. The ‘義倉’, which is led by the private sector to store grain, was evaluated as a ‘良法’ that can relieve people suffering from starvation in the right place. ‘勸分’ is a way to relieve famine by increasing the private food supply by encouraging wealthy people who can afford to supply grain at an appropriate price. ‘禁遏 糴’ means prohibiting interfering with local food exports during famine. This is to prevent the famine from worsening due to a kind of local egoism. ‘抑價有禁’ means that in a famine situation, grain prices in the market should not be suppressed or food prices should not be controlled at low prices. In other words, profits through appropriate prices must be guaranteed to induce local merchants to come and supply grain. In addition, ‘檢旱’ emphasizes the proper reporting of the famine damage by local authorities. ‘減租’ means that tax cuts should be given to farmers who suffered famine. ‘貸種’ means that hungry farmers should not be urged to lend and repay food. ‘恤農’ means that farmers should be treated preferentially over non-farmers, such as 遊手, when giving preference. ‘遣使’ emphasizes that local leaders should take responsibility and implement oral measures. ‘弛禁’ is to reduce the amount of money in the field. ‘治盜’ emphasizes strict response to thieves during famine. Besides, it is ‘捕蝗’, a corporation that catches grasshoppers. ‘通融有無’ is made in the same way as 借貸內庫 and 賑濟・賑糶・賑貸. ‘鬻爵’ and ‘度僧’ should be implemented only in an emergency while paying attention to side effects. In short, the characteristics of the famine relief plan shown in Dongwei’s “Jiuhuanghuominshu” is based on the traditional concept of ‘恤農’. In addition, it emphasizes the responsibility of local government officials. In addition, there is no fixed way to relieve famine, and it is said that it should be adapted to the condition of each region. Along with this, it values the self-regulated market ideology in famine relief policies such as ‘禁遏糴’ and ‘不抑價’. The same is true of the argument that the supply of grain will be smooth only when appropriate prices are guaranteed to wealthy people during the ‘勸分’.
참고문헌 (19)
- "宋史", 中華書局本, ~
- 程秘, "洺水集", 四庫全書本, ~
- 同治, "德興縣志", 同治11年刻本, ~
- 董煟, "救荒活民書", 四庫全書本, ~
- 張世南, "游宦紀聞", 四庫全書本, ~
- "元史", 中華書局本, ~
- "朝鮮王朝實錄", ~
- 이근명, "12世紀 南中國 地域社會의 動態와 遏糴", 歷史文化硏究, 22 (2005)
- Walter H. Mallory, ""China : Land of Famine", Nature, 120 (1927)
- 白杉悦雄, "救荒書の思想史的研究", 博士, pp.1997
- 周 宇, "歷代文獻對『救荒活民書』 的著錄及其文獻價值研究", 貴州師範學院學報, 33(2) (2017)
- 李向軍, "宋代荒政與救荒活民書", 沈陽師範學院學報(社會科學版), 17(4) (1993)
- 郭文佳, "董煟救荒活民書的價值與歷史地位評議", 商丘師範學院學報, 21 (2005)
- 張 文, "宋朝鄉村社會保障思想研究-以救荒活民書爲中心", 蘇州大學學報(哲學社會科學版) (2012)
- 欣 峰, "『救荒活民書』荒政思想研究", 華北水利水電大學學報(社會科學版), 33(6) (2017)
- 湯標中, "董煟的救荒活民書", 糧食知識, 14(2) (2000)
- 陳華龍, "救荒活民書作者生平及成書時間考", 農業考古, 4 (2015)
- 夏明方, "救荒活民: 清末民初以前中國荒政書考論論", 清史研究, 2 (2010)
- 趙杏根, "宋代蝗災應對和災異觀之變化", 重慶文理學院學報(社會科學版), 2012(5) (2012)
