본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일본군 전범의 자필진술서를 통해서 본 일본군 ‘위안부’ 문제

The Japanese military comfort station issue as seen through the handwritten statements of the Japanese military war criminals

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This article analyzes the statements of nine war criminals regarding the “comfort women” of the imperial Japanese military. The nationalities of these “comfort women” mentioned by the nine war criminals include China, Japan, and Korea. Especially, Japanese women are referred to as ‘ginyeo(=기녀(妓女)’ or ‘prostitutes.’ They named the facilities confined these women as “comfort stations,” but did not use the term “comfort women” directly. This paper emphasizes the noteworthiness of the statements indicating that war criminals dealt with comfort station-related matters within the category of rape. For example, Isao Inaba stated that while being stationed in the Yanxishan Army in Shaanxi Province, he operated a military “comfort station” during the civil war. Ono Taketsugu used different terms by stating that a Korean woman was present at the “comfort station” and “yolijeom.” This is significant in considering the continuity and discontinuity of comfort stations and brothels. Yutaka Takeuchi said, as a army surgeon, that he proposed to set up a comfort station for “sanitation,” which meant by the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. Ippei Azuma used emphasized marks(equivalent to double quotation marks in English) on the comfort station, and there is also a mention of “Auntie Kim,” who appeared to be a Korean trader. Although Takazawa Kenji visited a place called geumseongnu金城樓 and a comfort station separately, he mentioned that the acts in both places were “rape.” Yuichi Furukawa wrote, as an “administrative adviser” in Manchukuo, that he was aware of the “rape and gang rape” that had taken place in the “Japanese Military Soldier Comfort Station,” but he had ignored it. Watanabe and Hirose both stated the same facts related to the Japanese military comfort station, but Watanabe confessed that it is an “open rape facility,” while Hirose mentioned it as an “gigwan(妓館).”

Abstract

This article analyzes the statements of nine war criminals regarding the “comfort women” of the imperial Japanese military. The nationalities of these “comfort women” mentioned by the nine war criminals include China, Japan, and Korea. Especially, Japanese women are referred to as ‘ginyeo(=기녀(妓女)’ or ‘prostitutes.’ They named the facilities confined these women as “comfort stations,” but did not use the term “comfort women” directly. This paper emphasizes the noteworthiness of the statements indicating that war criminals dealt with comfort station-related matters within the category of rape. For example, Isao Inaba stated that while being stationed in the Yanxishan Army in Shaanxi Province, he operated a military “comfort station” during the civil war. Ono Taketsugu used different terms by stating that a Korean woman was present at the “comfort station” and “yolijeom.” This is significant in considering the continuity and discontinuity of comfort stations and brothels. Yutaka Takeuchi said, as a army surgeon, that he proposed to set up a comfort station for “sanitation,” which meant by the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. Ippei Azuma used emphasized marks(equivalent to double quotation marks in English) on the comfort station, and there is also a mention of “Auntie Kim,” who appeared to be a Korean trader. Although Takazawa Kenji visited a place called geumseongnu金城樓 and a comfort station separately, he mentioned that the acts in both places were “rape.” Yuichi Furukawa wrote, as an “administrative adviser” in Manchukuo, that he was aware of the “rape and gang rape” that had taken place in the “Japanese Military Soldier Comfort Station,” but he had ignored it. Watanabe and Hirose both stated the same facts related to the Japanese military comfort station, but Watanabe confessed that it is an “open rape facility,” while Hirose mentioned it as an “gigwan(妓館).”

참고문헌 (36)

  1. 가시하라 도쿠시, "일본의 군‘위안부’ 연구" (2011), 동북아역사재단
  2. 김수용, "동아시아 집단기억 형성의 가능성: 신중국 전범재판의 일본인 전범문제", 일본문화연구, (82), pp.57~80 (2022), 동아시아일본학회
  3. 김정현, "전쟁범죄・일본군 ‘위안부’피해실태 자료집-중국침략 일본전범 자필진술서" (2020), 동북아역사재단
  4. 동북아역사재단, "전쟁범죄・일본군‘위안부’피해실태 자료집-중국침략 일본전범 자필진술서" (2020), 동북아역사재단
  5. 동북아역사재단, "전쟁범죄・일본군‘위안부’피해실태 자료집-중국침략 일본전범 자필진술서 2" (2021), 동북아역사재단
  6. 마루카와 데쓰시(丸川哲史), "‘개조’와 ‘인죄(認罪):중화인민공화국에서의 ‘전범관리소’의 기원과 전개", 제노사이드연구, 5 (2009)
  7. 사토 후미카, "전쟁과 성폭력의 비교사" (2020), 어문학사
  8. 염송심, "전후 중국의 일본전범 재판 연구", 사림, (71), pp.317~350 (2020), 수선사학회[DOI]
  9. 우에노 지즈코, "전쟁과 성폭력의 비교사" (2020), 어문학사
  10. 이선이, "전쟁범죄・일본군‘위안부’피해실태자료집-중국침략 일본전범 자필진술서 2" (2021), 동북아역사재단
  11. 이선이, "중일전쟁시기 딩링(丁玲)의 일본군 성폭력재현과 1956년 전범재판 그 후 피해자 증언의 의미", 중국학보, (80), pp.263~290 (2017), 한국중국학회[DOI]
  12. 이선이, "일본군의 성폭력에 대한 一考察 -中國山西省피해자의 구술을 중심으로-", 사학연구, (120), pp.205~255 (2015), 한국사학회
  13. 이나바 이사오, "전쟁범죄・일본군‘위안부’피해실태 자료집- 중국침략 일본전범 자필진술서 2" (2021), 동북아역사재단
  14. 저우궤샹, "일본군 ‘위안부’문제와 과제Ⅱ" (2019), 동북아역사재단
  15. 제임스 도즈, "악한 사람들-중일전쟁 전범들을 인터뷰하다" (2020), 오월의 봄
  16. 테사 모리스-스즈키, "그 여자애들에 대해서는 알고 싶지 않 으세요? ‘위안부’, 아시아・태평양전쟁에서의 일본군과 연합군", 역사와 책임, 9 (2016)
  17. 후지타 히사카즈, "전쟁범죄란 무엇인가" (2017), 산지니
  18. 倉橋正直, "從軍慰安婦と公娼制度" (2010), 共栄書房
  19. 小野武次, "小野武次罪行供述", 中國欓案館藏 日本侵華戰犯筆供選編, 24 (2015)
  20. 東一兵, "東一兵罪行供述", 中國欓案館藏 日本侵華戰犯筆供選編, 38 (2015)
  21. 竹內豊, "一九五四年十一月竹內豊的筆供原文", 中國欓案館藏 日本侵華戰犯筆供選編, 54 (2017)
  22. 村山準人, "村山準人の供述書", 中國欓案館藏 日本侵華戰犯筆供選編, 54 (2017)
  23. 高沢健児, "高澤健児的筆供原文", 中國欓案館藏 日本侵華戰犯筆供選編, 80 (2017)
  24. 古川勇一, "古川勇一罪行供述書", 中國欓案館藏 日本侵華戰犯筆供選編, 95 (2017)
  25. 渡邊雅夫, "四三七號 渡邊雅夫罪行供述", 中國欓案館藏日本侵華戰犯筆供選編, 107 (2017)
  26. 伊香俊哉, "日本侵華戰犯筆供選編』の槪要-全120卷「摘要」に示された戰爭犯罪", 季刊 戰爭責任硏究, 91 (2018)
  27. 新井利男, "侵略の証言ー中国おける日本人戦犯自筆供述書" (1999), 岩波書店
  28. 奥村和一, "私は「蟻の兵隊」だったー中国に残留された日本兵" (2006), 岩波ジュニア新書
  29. 豊田雅幸, "中国侵略の証言者たちー「認罪」の記録をよむ" (2010), 岩波書店
  30. 岡部牧夫, "中国侵略の証言者たちー「認罪」の記録をよむ" (2010), 岩波書店
  31. "日本軍の慰安所政策について"[URL]
  32. 田辺敏雄, "正論" (1973), 産業経済新聞社, サンケイ出版
  33. "中国が日本人戦犯の直筆供述書を初めて全文公開45人分を毎日1人ずつ", 央广网北京, ~ (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)