본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

中国知识分子的现代性话语与亚洲构想

The Discourse of Modernity and the Conceptualization of Asia by Chinese Intellectuals

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류유교학

초록

本文通过对中国批判性知识分子汪晖的学问主体化战略的评价和批评,展现改革开放以后在西化、世界化的浪潮里知识社会对中国式社会主义的苦恼。汪晖一定程度上肯定了中国式社会主义的历史,针对美国霸权主义,试图对国际社会尤其是亚洲地区里的中国地位问题,作出提示。现今的中国知识社会里新自由主义者占据主导地位,他们支持西化、世界化,还主张国家的弱化和市场、市民社会的强化。汪晖面对这些人,积极肯定了国家的作用,从平等主义观点出发对资本主义近代化的问题点进行批评,他是“新左派”的代表性学者。汪晖将毛泽东的中国式社会主义经验规定为从清朝末期知识分子那里继承而来的“反现代性的现代性”,他既肯定了西方文明占主导并且扩散开来的现代性的肯定性方面,又批评西方的霸权主义属性,摸索出与西方现代化不同的现代化之路的结果就是中国社会主义。新自由主义者认为中国在国家的设计之下发展了市场和市民社会,于是根据国家/市场、国家/市民社会等二分法,主张弱化国家、强化市场和市民社会,认为这才是进步。汪晖则认为他们的主张是非现实的,在亚洲地区的连带、协作方案里,又觉得有必要对前民族国家时代亚洲地区的国际世界秩序,即以中国为中心的朝贡体系重新作出肯定的解释。本文既高度评价汪晖复合性思维的深度和现实性,又批评他对政治民主主义相对的不关注以及国家中心主义、中国中心主义。

Abstract

This paper is to show Chinese knowledge society’s’ concerns about Chinese socialism being proceeded with in the stream of westernization and globalization since Economic Reform and Open Door Policy, with specific reference to a Chinese critical intellectual Wang Hu’s subjectivation of scholarship strategy in a critical approach. Wang Hui, accepting the history of Chinese socialism to a degree, tries to reset the status of China to cope with American supremacy in the international society, particularly in the Asian region. At present Chinese knowledge society is dominated by neo-liberalists supporting westernization and globalization, insisting on the weak state and the strengthened market and civil society. On the contrary, Wang Hui is one of the representative scholars in the “New Left” camp, optimizing the role of the state and criticizing the problems of capitalist modernization from the egalitarian perspective. He defines the experience of Mao’s Chinese socialism as “anti-modern modernity” succeeded from the late Qing scholars. In other words, it’s the result from criticizing Western supremacy and seeking for a different modernization from that in the West, while approving of the good side of modernity which Western civilization has led and disseminated. Wang Hui also points that in modern China where the market and civil society have developed under state planning, the neo-liberal argument in which weakening the state and strengthening the market and civil society on the premise of state/market, state/civil society dichotomies is unrealistic. And regarding how to create solidarity and cooperation in the Asian region, he points to a need to positively reinterpret the Tributary System around China in the center, the pre-nation state world order. This paper, while highly acclaiming Wang Hui’s depth of multi-dimensional though and relevance, criticizes his relative disinterest in political democracy, state centrism and China centrism.

참고문헌 (7)

  1. 汪晖, "现代性问题答问. in : 死火重温" (2000), 人民文学出版社
  2. 汪晖, "想象新亚洲" (2003), 创批
  3. 语冰, "知识界的分裂与整合(代前言). in : 思潮" (2003), 中国社会科学出版社
  4. 甘阳, "中国自由左派的由来. in : 思潮" (2003), 中国社会科学出版社
  5. 赵京兰, "当今中国五位知性人的市民社会论分析", 哲学과现实, 62 (2004)
  6. 孙歌, "亚洲这一思维空间" (2003), 创批
  7. 裴景汉, "孙文의 中华意识과 韩国独立运动", 历史批评, 46 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)