본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Reconsideration of Yi Hwang's Four-Seven Theory

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류유교학

초록

The Four-Seven Debate between Toegye Yi Hwang (退溪 李滉) and Gobong Gieseung (高峯 奇大升) in 16th century Korea concerned the problem of explaining the Four Beginnings and the Seven Feelings (四端七情) in terms of the two ontological concepts of ri (理) and gi (氣). In this paper, I will focus on the questions raised in this debate about the following issues: (a) the origin or ontological basis of the Four Beginnings and the Seven Feelings; (b) the exact meaning of bal (發), which is used in the description of the origin of the Four and the Seven; (c) the possibility of ascribing activity or movability to ri; (d) the relation between the Four and the Seven; and (e) the possibility of nonequilibrium in the case of the Four. In explaining why each issue was raised, I will focus on the position of Yi Hwang rather than that of Gi Daeseung, and will show how far and in what way Yi Hwang revised his position in response to Gi Daeseung’s criticisms.

Abstract

The Four-Seven Debate between Toegye Yi Hwang (退溪 李滉) and Gobong Gieseung (高峯 奇大升) in 16th century Korea concerned the problem of explaining the Four Beginnings and the Seven Feelings (四端七情) in terms of the two ontological concepts of ri (理) and gi (氣). In this paper, I will focus on the questions raised in this debate about the following issues: (a) the origin or ontological basis of the Four Beginnings and the Seven Feelings; (b) the exact meaning of bal (發), which is used in the description of the origin of the Four and the Seven; (c) the possibility of ascribing activity or movability to ri; (d) the relation between the Four and the Seven; and (e) the possibility of nonequilibrium in the case of the Four. In explaining why each issue was raised, I will focus on the position of Yi Hwang rather than that of Gi Daeseung, and will show how far and in what way Yi Hwang revised his position in response to Gi Daeseung’s criticisms.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. Choi, Young-jin, "Hondam Yu Jeongdong baksa hwagap ginyeom nonchong", pp.87~108 (1981)
  2. Choi, Young-jin, "Toegye Yi Hwang: sadan chiljeongnon, seonghak sipdo, mujin yukjoso" (2007), Salim
  3. Choi, Young-jin, "Ugye Seong Hon seongniseol-ui gujojeok ihae—U", yul ‘sachil nonbyeon wangbokseo’ bunseok-eul jungsim-euro, 2008, pp.27, 7~28
  4. Fu, Charles Wei-hsun, "Toegye’s Thesis on the Four Beginnings and Seven Feelings", Korea Journal, 25(7), pp.16~24 (1985)
  5. 한자경, "사단칠정론에서 인간의 性과 情-퇴계의 對設과 고봉의 因設의 차이를 논함", 철학연구, (68), pp.169~195 (2005), 철학연구회
  6. Jin, Xi-de, "The ‘Four-Seven Debate’ and the School of Principle in Korea", Philosophy East and West, 37(4), pp.347~360 (1987)
  7. 정상봉, "주희철학과 한국사칠논변", 동서철학연구, (29), pp.207~224 (2003), 한국동서철학회
  8. Kim, Ki-hyun, "sadan chiljeong nonbyeon balsaeng-ui wonin-e gwanhan yeongu", Dongyang Cheolhak, 7, pp.3~20 (1996)
  9. Kim, Ki-hyun, "Toegye-ui ibalseol-i ganneun uiui-e daehan geomto", Cheolhak, 60, pp.5~29 (1999)
  10. 김낙진, "主理論으로 읽어본 奇大升의 사단칠정론", 퇴계학보, (124), pp.1~36 (2008), 퇴계학연구원
  11. Lee, Haeyong, "Yi Hwang ibalseol-ui uimironjeok gochal", Toegye hakbo, 80, pp.137~155 (1993)
  12. Lee, Sang-un, "Sachil nonbyon-gwa daeseol·inseol-ui uiui", Asea yeongu, 49, pp.1~33 (1973)
  13. Moon, Sok-yun, "Toegye-eseo ibal-gwa idong, ido-ui uimi-e daehayeo—i-ui neungdongseong munje", Toegye hakbo, 110, pp.161~201 (2001)
  14. 남지만, "高峰 奇大升의 四七說 중 ‘氣發’의 의미변화-理氣의 氣에서 氣質의 氣로-", 孔子學, (14), pp.5~23 (2007), 한국공자학회
  15. The Research Team for the Four-Seven Debate, "The Four-Seven Debate between Toegye and Gobong and between Yulgok and Ugye" (2008), Hanguk Haksul Jeongbo
  16. Song, Tae-yong, "Toegye Yi Hwang-ui sasang", Cheolhak-gwa hyeonsil, 24, pp.144~160 (1995)
  17. Song, Tae-yong, "Gobong Gi Daeseung-ui sadan chiljeongnon", Cheolhak-gwa hyeonsil, 26, pp.132~151 (1995)
  18. 유원기, "The Hylomorphism of Aristotle and T’oegye", 사회사상과 문화, (11), pp.207~234 (2005), 동양사회사상학회
  19. 유원기, "아리스토텔레스의 아이티온(aition)", 서양고전학연구, (24), pp.305~332 (2005), 한국서양고전학회
  20. 유원기, "율곡의 리기론에 대한 현대적 고찰", 철학논총, 4(46), pp.223~246 (2006), 새한철학회
  21. Yoo, Weon-ki, "An Analytical Examination of the Debate in the 16th Century Joseon’s Neo-Confucianism: Focusing on the Four-Seven Debate between Yi Hwang and Gi Daeseung", 박사, pp.2011
  22. 유원기, "이황과 기대승의 사칠논변에 대한 분석적 검토 - ‘소취이언(所就以言)’과 ‘소종래(所從來)’의 함의를 중심으로 -", 유교사상문화연구, (44), pp.129~156 (2011), 한국유교학회
  23. 유원기, "율곡의 심성론에 대한 새로운 분석", 양명학, 28(28), pp.301~328 (2011), 한국양명학회
  24. 유원기, "A Philosophical Analysis of the Concept “Bal", Fa 發” in the Four-Seven Debate between Toegye and Gobong, 2012, pp.52(2), 92~115[DOI]
  25. 유원기, "퇴ㆍ율 사상 연구의 현황과 과제", 한국학논집, 50(50), pp.127~155 (2013), 한국학연구원
  26. Yun, Sa-sun, "On Toegye’s Philosophy" (1980), Korea University Press
  27. Yun, Sa-sun, "Toegye’s View of Human Nature as Fundamentally Good", Korea Journal, 25(7), pp.4~15 (1985)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)