본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Meritocracy and the Tests of Virtue in Greek and Confucian Political Thought

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류유교학

초록

A crucial tenet of virtue-based or expertise-based theorizing about politics is that there are ways to identify and select morally and epistemically excellent people to hold office. This paper considers historical challenges to this task that come from within Greek and Confucian thought and political practice. Philosophers in both traditions agreed that reliable assessments of character could be made only through close observation over time, through regular interaction. And they suggested that even these sorts of assessments were difficult, often relying on bad or imperfect proxies. Because of how difficult it is to assess character in ordinary settings, we argue that it is even more difficult to design institutions that select for virtue at the much wider political scale. Specifically, we argue that the vast majority of proposals that purport to select for virtue are either (a) unlikely to be effective, (b) not implementable at the scale of most current nations, or (c) have already been incorporated into most democratic states. Thus defenders of meritocratic institutions should take more seriously the practical barriers that will almost certainly arise when trying to implement these proposals at scale. Historical proponents of meritocratic values were well aware of concerns about the feasibility of their political ideals, and we should be too.

Abstract

A crucial tenet of virtue-based or expertise-based theorizing about politics is that there are ways to identify and select morally and epistemically excellent people to hold office. This paper considers historical challenges to this task that come from within Greek and Confucian thought and political practice. Philosophers in both traditions agreed that reliable assessments of character could be made only through close observation over time, through regular interaction. And they suggested that even these sorts of assessments were difficult, often relying on bad or imperfect proxies. Because of how difficult it is to assess character in ordinary settings, we argue that it is even more difficult to design institutions that select for virtue at the much wider political scale. Specifically, we argue that the vast majority of proposals that purport to select for virtue are either (a) unlikely to be effective, (b) not implementable at the scale of most current nations, or (c) have already been incorporated into most democratic states. Thus defenders of meritocratic institutions should take more seriously the practical barriers that will almost certainly arise when trying to implement these proposals at scale. Historical proponents of meritocratic values were well aware of concerns about the feasibility of their political ideals, and we should be too.

참고문헌 (54)

  1. Reality) in the History of Chinese Philosophy, "The Idea of Cheng (Sincerity", pp.2005, An, Yanming
  2. Angle, Stephen C., "Neo-Confucianism : A Philosophical Introduction" (2017), Polity Press
  3. Annas, Julia, "An Introduction to Plato’s Republic" (1981), Oxford University Press
  4. Annas, Julia, "Virtue and Law in Plato and Beyond" (2017), Oxford University Press
  5. Bai, Tongdong, "New Mission for an Old State: Classical Confucian Political Philosophy in a Contemporary and Comparative Context" (2009), Beijing daxue chuban she
  6. Bai, Tongdong, "The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective", pp.55~87 (2013), Cambridge University Press
  7. Bai, Tongdong, "Against Political Equality: The Confucian Case" (2020), Princeton University Press
  8. Baima, Nicholas, "On the Value of Drunkenness in the Laws", History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis, 20, pp.65~81 (2017)
  9. Baima, Nicholas, "Playing with Intoxication on the Cultivation of Shame and Virtue in Plato’s Laws", Apeiron: Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science, 51, pp.345~370 (2018)
  10. Bell, Daniel A, "Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context" (2006), Princeton University Press
  11. Bell, Daniel A, "The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy" (2015), Princeton University Press
  12. Chan, Joseph, "The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective", pp.31~54 (2013), Cambridge University Press
  13. Chan, Joseph, "Confucian Perfectionism: A Political Philosophy for Modern Times" (2014), Princeton University Press
  14. Chiu-Duke, Josephine, "To Rebuild the Empire: Lu Chih’s Confucian Pragmatist Approach to the Mid-T’ang Predicament" (2000), SUNY Press
  15. Ebrey, Patricia B, "State and Society in Early Medieval China", pp.49~72 (1990), Stanford University Press
  16. Elman, Benjamin, "The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective", pp.203~231 (2013), Cambridge University Press
  17. Elman, Benjamin, "A Cultural History of the Civil Service Examinations in Late Imperial China" (2020), University of California Press
  18. Graffin, Dennis, "State and Society in Early Medieval China", pp.145~155 (1990), Stanford University Press
  19. Hulme, Emily, "The Routledge Handbook on Women and Ancient Greek Philosophy", Routledge
  20. Jiang, Qing, "Bell and Ruiping Fan" (2013), Princeton University Press
  21. Kamtekar, Rachana, "Situationism and Virtue Ethics on the Content of Our Character", Ethics, 114, pp.458~491 (2004)
  22. Kamtekar, Rachana, "The Profession of Friendship: Callicles, Democratic Politics, and Rhetorical Education in the Gorgias", Ancient Philosophy, 25, pp.319~339 (2005)
  23. Kim, Sungmoon, "Confucian Democracy in East Asia: Theory and Practice" (2014), Cambridge University Press
  24. Kogelmann, Brian, "Finding the Epistocrats", Episteme, 20(2), pp.497~512 (2023)
  25. Kuhn, Dieter, "The Age of Confucian Rule: The Song Transformation of China" (2009), The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
  26. Landauer, Matthew, "Drinking Parties Correctly Ordered: Plato on Mass Participation and the Necessity of Rule", The Journal of Politics, 84(4), pp.2011~2022 (2022)
  27. Lane, Melissa, "Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective", pp.52~72 (2016), Cambridge University Press
  28. Liang, Wanru, "The Book of Lord Shang, with Reading Guide and Translation by Liang Wanru" (2017), Zhonghua shuju
  29. Lu, Zhi, "Collected Writings from the Hanlin Garden"
  30. Macedo, Stephen, "The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective", pp.232~256 (2013), Cambridge University Press
  31. Moss, Jessica, "The Doctor and the Pastry Chef: Pleasure and Persuasion in Plato’s Gorgias", Ancient Philosophy, 27, pp.229~249 (2007)
  32. Nivison, David S, "The Chinese Civil Service: Career Open to Talent?", pp.92~106 (1963), Heath and Company
  33. Nguyen, C. Thi, "Expertise and the Fragmentation of Intellectual Autonomy", Philosophical Inquiries, 6(2), pp.107~124 (2018)
  34. Nguyen, C. Thi, "Transparency Is Surveillance", Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 105(2), pp.331~361 (2021)
  35. Pines, Yuri, "The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective", pp.161~202 (2013), Cambridge University Press
  36. Pines, Yuri, "The Book of Lord Shang: Apologetics of State Power in Early China" (2017), Columbia University Press
  37. Reid, Jeremy, "The Offices of Magnesia", Polis, 37(3), pp.567~589 (2020)
  38. Reid, Jeremy, "The Cambridge Companion to Democracy", Cambridge University Press
  39. Schwitzbegel, Eric, "The Companion to Experimental Philosophy", pp.225~233 (2016), Wiley-Blackwell
  40. Scott, James C, "Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed" (1998), Vail-Ballou Press
  41. Shaoguang, Wang, "A Confucian Constitutional Order: How China’s Ancient Past Can Shape Its Political Future", pp.139~158 (2013), Princeton University Press
  42. Slingerland, Edward, "Analects: With Selections from Traditional Commentaries" (2003), Hackett Publishing Company
  43. Tan, Kenneth Paul, "The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective", pp.314~339 (2013), Cambridge University Press
  44. Tiwald, Justin, "The Oxford Handbook of Virtue", pp.171~189 (2018), Oxford University Press
  45. Tiwald, Justin, "Coming to Terms with Wang Yangming’s Strong Ethical Nativism: On Wang’s Claim That ‘Establishing Sincerity’ (Licheng 立誠) Can Help Us Fully Grasp Everything that Matters Ethically", Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture, 39, pp.65~90 (2023)
  46. Trivigno, Franco, "Plato’s Statesman: A Philosophical Discussion", pp.156~176 (2021), Oxford University Press
  47. Westra, Evan, "Getting to Know You: Accuracy and Error in Judgments of Character", Mind & Language, 35(5), pp.583~600 (2020)
  48. Wong, Benjamin, "The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective", pp.288~313 (2013), Cambridge University Press
  49. Xiao, Hong, "The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective", pp.340~362 (2013), Cambridge University Press
  50. Xiao, Gongquan, "A History of Chinese Political Thought" (1982), Lianjing
  51. Zhang, Yongle, "The Future of Meritocracy: A Discussion of Daniel Bell’s The China Model", Journal of Chinese Humanities, 4, pp.49~64 (2018)
  52. Zheng, Zemian, "The Sincerity Pass: A Reconstruction of the History of Philosophy from Zhu Xi’s Late Period to Wang Yangming" (2022), Renmin chuban she
  53. Zhu, Xi, "Collected Commentaries on the Four Books" (1983), Zhonghua shuju
  54. Zhu, Xi, "Classified Sayings of Master Zhu" (1986), Zhonghua shuju

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)