Merit and Inequality: Confucian and Communitarian Perspectives on Singapore’s Meritocracy
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper compares criticisms of Singapore’s meritocracy, especially against its impact on income disparities and class divisions, with Michael Sandel’s critique of the meritocratic ethic in the United States. Despite significant differences in their history and politics, meritocracy has similar dysfunctions in both societies, allowing us to draw theoretical conclusions about meritocracy as an ideal of governance. It then contrasts Sandel’s communitarian critique of meritocracy with recent Confucian promotion of political meritocracy and meritocratic justice and argues that the Confucian principle of “promoting the virtuous and talented” is different from the contemporary conception of meritocracy. Textual evidence indicates that a Confucian understanding of “merit” is contrary to the technocratic expertise of contemporary meritocracies. Furthermore, pre-Qin Confucian texts do not support a conception of justice that emphasizes individual desert; they address distributive problems from the perspective of needs and sustaining social relations. The texts also support limiting the reign of merit when it results in inequalities that cause suffering, inhibit personal cultivation of some groups, or undermine social relations. The paper concludes with an assessment of Singapore’s on-going attempts to improve its meritocracy from a Confucian perspective.
Abstract
This paper compares criticisms of Singapore’s meritocracy, especially against its impact on income disparities and class divisions, with Michael Sandel’s critique of the meritocratic ethic in the United States. Despite significant differences in their history and politics, meritocracy has similar dysfunctions in both societies, allowing us to draw theoretical conclusions about meritocracy as an ideal of governance. It then contrasts Sandel’s communitarian critique of meritocracy with recent Confucian promotion of political meritocracy and meritocratic justice and argues that the Confucian principle of “promoting the virtuous and talented” is different from the contemporary conception of meritocracy. Textual evidence indicates that a Confucian understanding of “merit” is contrary to the technocratic expertise of contemporary meritocracies. Furthermore, pre-Qin Confucian texts do not support a conception of justice that emphasizes individual desert; they address distributive problems from the perspective of needs and sustaining social relations. The texts also support limiting the reign of merit when it results in inequalities that cause suffering, inhibit personal cultivation of some groups, or undermine social relations. The paper concludes with an assessment of Singapore’s on-going attempts to improve its meritocracy from a Confucian perspective.
참고문헌 (88)
- Ames, Roger T, "The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation" (1998), Ballantine
- Bai, Tongdong, "Against Political Equality: The Confucian Case" (2020), Princeton University Press
- Ban, Gu, "Han History" (1975), Zhonghua Shuju
- Bell, Daniel A, "Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context", pp.152~179 (2006), Princeton University Press
- Bell, Daniel A, "China Model: Political Legitimacy and the Limits of Democracy" (2015), Princeton University Press
- Bell, Daniel A., "Confucianism for the Modern World" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Bell, Daniel A., "The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective" (2013), Cambridge University Press
- Bell, Daniel A., "Just Hierarchy: Why Social Hierarchies Matter in China and the Rest of the World" (2020), Princeton University Press
- Bellows, Thomas J, "Meritocracy and the Singapore Political System", Asian Journal of Political Science, 17(1), pp.24~44 (2009)
- Berger, Peter L., "In Search of an East Asian Development Model" (1988), Transaction Books
- Chan, Joseph, "Democracy and Meritocracy: Towards a Confucian Perspective", Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 34(2), pp.179~193 (2007)
- Chan, Joseph, "Confucian Perfectionism" (2014), Princeton University Press
- Chan, Steve, "East Asian Dynamism" (1993), Westview Press
- Cheng, Willie, "Pushing Back on Privilege and Meritocracy", Straits Times, ~ (2017)
- Chua, Beng Huat, "Communitarian Ideology and Democracy in Singapore" (1995), Routledge
- Chua, Beng Huat, "Liberalism Disavowed : Communitarianism and State Capitalism in Singapore" (2017), Cornell University Press
- Chua, Mui Hoong, "Class Divide: Singapore in Danger of Becoming Academic Aristocracy", Straits Times, ~ (2018)
- Chua, Vincent, "Elitism for the Masses", Straits Times, ~ (1994)
- Chua, Vincent, "Social Capital in Singapore : The Power of Network Diversity" (2021), Routledge
- Fernandez, Warren, "PAP’s Values Helped Singapore Succeed", Straits Times, ~ (1996)
- Frank, Robert H, "Success and Luck : Good Fortune and the Myth of Meritocracy" (2016), Princeton University Press
- Goh, Timothy, "Is Meritocracy Preventing S'poreans from Giving Back?", Straits Times, ~ (2019)
- Han, Fook Kwang, "Lee Kuan Yew: The Man and His Ideas" (1998), Straits Times Press
- Heng, Janice, "Review and Adapt Policies as Needed to Tackle Inequality, Sustain Mobility", Straits Times, ~ (2020)
- Heng, Melissa, "No Better System than Meritocracy, but Things Can Improve", Straits Times, ~ (2020)
- Ho, Grace, "Broaden and Enhance Meritocracy to Give Singaporeans Hope and Opportunity", Straits Times, ~ (2021)
- Ho, Grace, "News Analysis; Fairness and Inclusion Vital to the National Conversation", Straits Times, ~ (2022)
- Hominh, Yarran, "In Defense of Political Equality: On Bai Tongdong’s Against Political Equality", Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture, 37, pp.59~90 (2022)
- Hussain, Zakir, "Inequality under the Spotlight", Straits Times, ~ (2018)
- Ibrahim, Zuraidah, "Singapore’s Key Strengths : Meritocracy and Efficient Incorrupt Govt", Straits Times, ~ (1992)
- Ibrahim, Zuraidah, "Will Income Gap Divide S’pore", Straits Times, ~ (1993)
- Ibrahim, Zuraidah, "Include Opportunities for All", Straits Times, ~ (1991)
- Inoguchi, Takashi, "The Quality of Life in Confucian Asia. Vol. 40 of Social Indicator Research" (2010), Springer
- Jiang, Qing, "A Confucian Constitutional Order: How China’s Ancient Past Can Shape Its Political Future" (2013), Princeton University Press
- Kampfner, John, "Freedom for Sale : How We Made Money and Lost Our Liberty" (2009), Simon & Schuster
- Knoblock, John, "Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works Vol. II" (1990), Stanford University Press
- Koh, Daniel, "Beware of Going Overboard with Roots, Meritocracy", Straits Times, ~ (1991)
- Koh, Fabian, "Future Civil Service Leaders Urged to Uphold Values of Meritocracy", Straits Times, ~ (2018)
- Kuah, Adrian W. J., "The Problem with a Single-Dimension Definition of Meritocracy", Straits Times, ~ (2019)
- Kuo, Eddie C. Y, "Confucian Traditions in East Asian Modernity: Moral Education and Economic Culture in Japan and the Four Mini-Dragons", pp.294~309 (1996), Harvard University Press
- Kurochi, Rei, "4G Team to Create Opportunities at Every Stage of Life for All", Straits Times, ~ (2019)
- Lai, Linette, "Lawrence Wong Outlines ‘Resetting’ for a Fairer, Greener, More United Singapore", Straits Times, ~ (2021)
- Lai, Linette, "Meritocracy Is Work in Progress ‘to Refine and Improve’ Upon", Straits Times, ~ (2021)
- Lau, D. C, "Mencius" (1970), Penguin
- Lee, Edwin, "Singapore: The Unexpected Nation" (2008), Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
- Lee, Hsien Loong, "Singapore: Re-Engineering Success", pp.2~9 (1998), Oxford University Press
- Lee, Kuan Yew, "From Third World to First, the Singapore Story: 1965–2000" (2000), HarperCollins
- Lim, Edmund, "How to Stop Meritocracy Becoming a Dirty Word", Straits Times, ~ (2018)
- Lim, Linda, "Psychological Factors May Explain Resistance to More Redistribution", Straits Times, ~ (2018)
- Lim, Lydia, "Thinking Aloud : Class Divide and Inequality Make for Poor Mix", Straits Times, ~ (2018)
- Littler, Jo, "Against Meritocracy : Culture, Power and Myths of Mobility" (2018), Routledge
- Low, Donald, "Hard Choices: Challenging the Singapore Consensus", pp.48~58 (2014), NUS Press
- MacFarquhar, Roderick, "The Post-Confucian Challenge", Economist, 67~72 (1980)
- Mauzy, Diane K., "Singapore Politics under the People’s Action Party" (2002), Routledge
- McNamee, Stephen J, "The Meritocracy Myth" (2014), Rowman & Littlefield
- Means, Gordon P, "Soft Authoritarianism in Malaysia and Singapore", Journal of Democracy, 7(4), pp.103~116 (1996)
- Mulligan, Thomas, "Political Philosophy for the Real World" (2018), Routledge
- Mulligan, Thomas, "How East Meets West: Justice and Consequences in Confucian Meritocracy", Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture, 37, pp.17~38 (2022)
- Ng, Jun Sen, "Develop a Singapore Brand of Meritocracy", Straits Times, ~ (2018)
- Ong, Ye Kung, "Meritocracy and the Paradox of Success", Straits Times, ~ (2018)
- Pines, Yuri, "The East Asian Challenge for Democracy", pp.161~202 (2013), Cambridge University Press
- Puett, Michael, "The Magnitude of Ming: Command, Allotment, and Fate in Chinese Culture", pp.49~69 (2005), University of Hawai’i Press
- "Re-Inventing Singapore", Straits Times, ~ (1997)
- Sandel, Michael J, "The Tyranny of Merit: What’s Become of the Common Good?" (2020), Farrar, Straus and Giroux
- Singapore Ministry of Social and Family Development, "Improving the Lives of Low-Income and Vulnerable Families in Singapore", ~ (2018)
- "Suharto’s Fall Due to Economic Failure", Straits Times, ~ (1998)
- Sum, Kam Weng, "Give up ‘Entitlements’ to Become More Civic-Minded", Straits Times, ~ (2018)
- Sun, Tsai-Wei, "Governing Singapore: The Group Representation Constituency (GRC) System and Its Effect on Inclusiveness and Electoral Participation", Asian Education and Development Studies, 4(3), pp.282~298 (2015)
- Talib, Nadira, "Is It Time to Let Meritocracy Go? Examining the Case of Singapore" (2021), Routledge
- Tan, Jason, "Equity in Excellence: Experiences of East Asian High-Performing Education Systems", pp.111~125 (2018), Springer Nature
- Tan, Kenneth Paul, "Meritocracy and Elitism in a Global City: Ideological Shifts in Singapore", International Political Science Review, 29(1), pp.7~27 (2008)
- Tan, Sor-hoon, "Confucian Democracy: A Deweyan Reconstruction" (2003), State University of New York Press
- Tan, Sor-hoon, "Beyond Elitism: A Community Ideal for a Modern East Asia", Philosophy East and West, 59(4), pp.537~553 (2009)
- Tan, Sor-hoon, "Resolution of Conflict in Korea, East Asia and Beyond", pp.117~147 (2012), Academy of Korean Studies Press
- Tan, Sor-hoon, "The Concept of Yi (义) in the Mencius and Problems of Distributive Justice", Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 92(3), pp.1~17 (2014)
- Tan, Sumiko, "S’pore Too Obsessed with Brains", Straits Times, ~ (1990)
- Teo, You Yenn, "This Is What Inequality Looks Like" (2018), Ethos Books
- Valmisa, Mercedes, "The Reification of Fate in Early China", Early China, 42, pp.147~199 (2019)
- Wall, Steven, "Natural Aristocracy, Instrumentalism, Equality and Excellence", Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture, 37, pp.39~57 (2022)
- Wong, Benjamin, "The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective", pp.288~313 (2013), Cambridge University Press
- "Speech at the Launch of Forward Singapore" (2022)[URL]
- Yahya, Yasmine, "Parliament : Time to Examine Meritocracy and Inequality, Says Kok Heng Leun", Straits Times, ~ (2018)
- Yahya, Yasmine, "Singapore Must Ensure No One Is Left Behind as Country Progresses", Straits Times, ~ (2018)
- Yip, Si Yuan Donna, "Danger of Being Engulfed by Meritocracy", Straits Times, ~ (2018)
- Young, Michael, "The Rise of the Meritocracy 1870–2033: An Essay on Education and Equality" (1961), Penguin
- Zakaria, Fareed, "Culture Is Destiny: A Conversation with Lee Kuan Yew", Foreign Affairs, 73(2), pp.109~126 (1994)
- Zhuo, Tee, "Critique of Us Meritocracy Merits Serious Thought for Singaporeans", The Straits Times, ~ (2020)
- Zhuo, Tee, "Lessons on Meritocracy’s Pitfalls", Straits Times, ~ (2020)