In Defense of Political Equality: On Bai Tongdong’s Against Political Equality
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Bai Tongdong’s Against Political Equality argues for Confucian meritocracy over a pure democracy of equals. His arguments draw on a multiple modernities comparison between the Spring and Autumn Warring States period in China and early modernity in the West, and rest on a Mencian conception of human nature according to which humans are equal in moral potential but not in moral actuality. I argue that there is a crucial disanalogy between this Chinese early modernity and Western early modernity: the role of capitalism. In a similarly comparativist and modernist spirit, drawing on B. R. Ambedkar and M. K. Gandhi, I argue that this disanalogy challenges both Bai’s critique of democracy and his positive account. Bai’s failure to take into account the role of capitalism in Western modernity raises a challenge to the explanatory power of his Mencian conception of human nature with regard to the failings of contemporary democracies, namely that capitalism fosters the relevant features of our moral psychology that cause those failings. Further, without that grounding assumption, Bai’s arguments against democracy cut equally against his Confucian meritocracy. The disanalogy also creates challenges for his positive proposal. Bai, I argue, provides an ideal theory of Confucian meritocracy at the same time as he provides a non-ideal theory of democracy. But, taking into account the non-ideal cultural and moral psychological features of capitalism, Bai’s Confucian meritocracy is likely to fall into an unjust and oligarchic hierarchy.
Abstract
Bai Tongdong’s Against Political Equality argues for Confucian meritocracy over a pure democracy of equals. His arguments draw on a multiple modernities comparison between the Spring and Autumn Warring States period in China and early modernity in the West, and rest on a Mencian conception of human nature according to which humans are equal in moral potential but not in moral actuality. I argue that there is a crucial disanalogy between this Chinese early modernity and Western early modernity: the role of capitalism. In a similarly comparativist and modernist spirit, drawing on B. R. Ambedkar and M. K. Gandhi, I argue that this disanalogy challenges both Bai’s critique of democracy and his positive account. Bai’s failure to take into account the role of capitalism in Western modernity raises a challenge to the explanatory power of his Mencian conception of human nature with regard to the failings of contemporary democracies, namely that capitalism fosters the relevant features of our moral psychology that cause those failings. Further, without that grounding assumption, Bai’s arguments against democracy cut equally against his Confucian meritocracy. The disanalogy also creates challenges for his positive proposal. Bai, I argue, provides an ideal theory of Confucian meritocracy at the same time as he provides a non-ideal theory of democracy. But, taking into account the non-ideal cultural and moral psychological features of capitalism, Bai’s Confucian meritocracy is likely to fall into an unjust and oligarchic hierarchy.
참고문헌 (40)
- Ambedkar, B. R., "Vol. 9 of Writings and Speeches of B. R. Ambedkar" (2014), Dr. Ambedkar Foundation
- Ancell, Aaron, "Democracy Isn’t That Smart (But We Can Make It Smarter): On Landemore’s Democratic Reason", Episteme, 14(2), pp.161~175 (2017)
- Aristotle, "Nicomachean Ethics" (2020), Cambridge University Press
- Bai, Tongdong, "Against Political Equality: The Confucian Case" (2020), Princeton University Press
- Baldwin, James, "Revolutionary Hope", Essence Magazine, ~ (1984)
- Bartels, Larry M, "The Unsustainable American State", pp.167~196 (2009), Oxford University Press
- Bartels, Larry M., "Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age" (2016), Princeton University Press
- Bilgrami, Akeel, "Secularism, Identity, and Enchantment" (2014), Harvard University Press
- Bilgrami, Akeel, "Beyond the Secular West", pp.215~245 (2016), Columbia University Press
- Brennan, Jason, "Against Democracy" (2016), Princeton University Press
- Caplan, Bryan Douglas, "The Myth of the Rational Voter" (2007), Princeton University Press
- Connelly, Brian L., "Tournament Theory: Thirty Years of Contests and Competitions", Journal of Management, 40(1), pp.16~47 (2014)
- Dewey, John, "Vol. 13 of The Later Works of John Dewey, edited by Jo Ann Boydston", pp.65~188 (1939), Southern Illinois University Press
- Dillon, Robin S., "Out from the Shadows: Analytical Feminist Contributions to Traditional Philosophy", pp.83~106 (2012), Oxford University Press
- Dirks, Nicholas B., "Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India" (2002), Princeton University Press
- Du Bois, W. E. B., "Darkwater" (1920), Oxford University Press
- Fricker, Miranda, "Epistemic Injustice" (2007), Oxford University Press
- Gandhi, M. K, "Vol. 50 of The Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi" (1932), Publications Division of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India
- Ganeri, Jonardon, "The Lost Age of Reason: Philosophy in Early Modern India 1450-1700" (2011), Oxford University Press
- Gilens, Martin, "Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness", Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(5), pp.778~796 (2005)
- Guinier, Lani, "The Tyranny of the Meritocracy" (2016), Beacon Press
- Hardin, Russell, "Liberal Distrust", European Review, 10(1), pp.73~89 (2002)
- Hardin, Russell, "Distrust" (2004), Russell Sage Foundation
- Hobsbawm, Eric, "The Age of Capital 1848-1875" (1977), Abacus
- Mangabeira Unger, Roberto, "Politics: The Central Texts" (1997), Verso Books
- Mantena, Karuna, "On Gandhi’s Critique of the State: Sources, Contexts, Conjunctures", Modern Intellectual History, 9(3), pp.535~563 (2012)
- Mantena, Karuna, "Another Realism: The Politics of Gandhian Nonviolence", American Political Science Review, 106(2), pp.455~470 (2012)
- Markovits, Daniel, "The Meritocracy Trap" (2019), Penguin Press
- Marx, Karl, "Early Political Writings" (2007), Cambridge University Press
- Morton, Jennifer, "Moving Up Without Losing Your Way: The Ethical Costs of Upward Mobility" (2019), Princeton University Press
- Mulligan, Thomas, "On the Compatibility of Epistocracy and Public Reason", Social Theory and Practice, 41(3), pp.458~476 (2015)
- Olivelle, Patrick, "The Dharmasūtras: The Law Codes of Ancient India" (1999), Oxford University Press
- Olivelle, Patrick, "Hinduism and Law: An Introduction", pp.28~57 (2010), Cambridge University Press
- Pinheiro, Lucas G., "A Factory Afield: Capitalism and Empire in John Locke’s Political Economy", Modern Intellectual History, 19(1), pp.1~28 (2020)
- Rose, Julie L., "Free Time" (2016), Princeton University Press
- Scanlon, T. M., "Why Does Inequality Matter?" (2018), Oxford University Press
- Smith, Subrena E, "Evolutionary Psychology Possible?", Biological Theory, 15, pp.39~49 (2019)
- Tucker, Aviezer, "Democracy against Liberalism: Its Rise and Fall" (2020), Cambridge University Press
- Williams, Bernard, "Problems of the Self", pp.230~249 (1973), Cambridge University Press
- Wood, Ellen Meiksins, "The Origins of Capitalism" (2002), Verso Books