Examination Meritocracy in Contemporary Korea and Song Confucian Scholars’ Criticism of the Civil Service Examination
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In intense fairness discourse, Koreans have shown strong belief in “exami nations.” Examination meritocracy is supported by belief that it is the most objective and fair way to prove “merit” in the selection process. It is widely recognized that exam meritocracy is tied to Confucian tradition. Confucian scholars, however, have criticized it since the Song dynasty, when it was firmly entrenched. Sima Guang criticized the civil exam system for lacking fairness, arguing that the political, economic, and cultural disparity at the regional level played a decisive role in determining the success or failure of the examination. He argued that there must be a guaranteed quota for each circuit. Ouyang Xiu challenged Sima Guang’s argument about correcting the structural unfairness, as he believed it severely impacted the formal fairness. Cheng Hao asserted that virtue could not be assessed by examinations and proposed to promote candidates from provincial schools to the Imperial University through recom mendation. Zhu Xi’s proposal seems to be at odds with Sima Guang and Cheng Hao. He believed that as the vested interests of Southern Song dynasty were consolidated, the ease of access to the university for vested students actually exacerbated the unfairness. Therefore, he argued for reducing the quota of the Imperial University and returning the quota to the provinces, and emphasized moral education at the local level. The criticism of the examination can be traced throughout Confucian history, revealing that these beliefs are unreliable, and that therefore the current idea of examination meritocracy is built on a weak and questionable foundation.
Abstract
In intense fairness discourse, Koreans have shown strong belief in “exami nations.” Examination meritocracy is supported by belief that it is the most objective and fair way to prove “merit” in the selection process. It is widely recognized that exam meritocracy is tied to Confucian tradition. Confucian scholars, however, have criticized it since the Song dynasty, when it was firmly entrenched. Sima Guang criticized the civil exam system for lacking fairness, arguing that the political, economic, and cultural disparity at the regional level played a decisive role in determining the success or failure of the examination. He argued that there must be a guaranteed quota for each circuit. Ouyang Xiu challenged Sima Guang’s argument about correcting the structural unfairness, as he believed it severely impacted the formal fairness. Cheng Hao asserted that virtue could not be assessed by examinations and proposed to promote candidates from provincial schools to the Imperial University through recom mendation. Zhu Xi’s proposal seems to be at odds with Sima Guang and Cheng Hao. He believed that as the vested interests of Southern Song dynasty were consolidated, the ease of access to the university for vested students actually exacerbated the unfairness. Therefore, he argued for reducing the quota of the Imperial University and returning the quota to the provinces, and emphasized moral education at the local level. The criticism of the examination can be traced throughout Confucian history, revealing that these beliefs are unreliable, and that therefore the current idea of examination meritocracy is built on a weak and questionable foundation.
참고문헌 (25)
- Bell, Daniel, "The China Model" (2015), Princeton University Press
- Chaffee, John W, "The Thorny Gates of Learning in Sung China: A Social History of Examinations, supplement" (1995), State University of New York Press
- 장은주, "한국사회에서 “메리토크라시의 발흥”과 교육 문제: “민주주의적 정의”를 모색하며", 사회와 철학, 21, pp.71~106 (2011)
- Cheng, Hao, "Collected Works of the Two Chengs" (2004), Zhonghua shuju
- Chiang, Qing, "Political Confucianism" (2003), Sanlian shudian
- de Botton, Alain, "Status Anxiety" (2005), Vintage International
- 하원수, "과거제도 형성사" (2021), Sungkyunkwan University Press
- Kracke, Edward, "Chinese Thought and Institution" (1975), University of Chicago Press
- Kracke, Edward, "Crisis and Prosperity in Sung China" (1975), University of Arizona Press
- "2년전 1285명 정규직화 끝낸 서울교통公...공채 직원들 “임금 줄어” 갈등은 계속된다" (2020)[URL]
- Lee, Thomas H. C, "Government Education and Examinations in Sung China" (1985), Chinese University Press
- Li, Tao, "Extended Continuation to the Zizhi Tongjian" (2016), Zhonghua shuju
- "Comprehensive Examination of Literature"[URL]
- Miyazaki, Yichisada, "The State Examinations: China’s Examination Hell" (2003), Chūōkōron shinsha
- "Wenzhong ji"[URL]
- "인천공항공사, 비정규직 2,143명 직접고용... 정규직화 3년만에 마무리" (2020), 박준철[URL]
- 박권일, "한국의 능력주의" (2021), Idea
- "The Collected Works of Master Sima"[URL]
- Tiwald, Justin, "Meritocracy and the Tests of Virtue in Greek and Confucian Political Thought", Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture, 41 (2024)
- Twichett, Denis, "The Birth of the Chinese Meritocracy: Bureaucrats and Examinations in Tang China", The China Society Occasional Study, 18 (1976)
- Woodside, Alexander, "Lost Modernities: China, Vietnam, Korea and the Hazards of World History" (2006), Harvard University Press
- Xu, Song, "Collated Draft of Important Documents of the Song" (2014), Shanghai guji chubanshe
- Young, Michael, "The Rise of the Meritocracy" (1958), Thames and Hudson
- Yu, Ying-shih, "The Historical World of Zhu Xi: Research on the Political Culture of the Scholar-Officials of the Song Dynasty" (2004), Sanlian shudian
- Zhu, Xi, "The Collected Works of Master Zhu" (2002), Shanghai guji chubashe