본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Meritocracy as an Ideology for Neoliberalism: A Korean Case

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류유교학

초록

This paper considers meritocracy as a new social problem in Korea that has emerged since the IMF crisis in 1997. Drawing upon Daniel Markovitz’ recent analysis of meritocracy in America, I emphasize the connection between the neoliberalization of society and the popularization of the belief in meritocratic justice. I pay particular attention to the controversy over the conversion of irregular workers at the Incheon International Airport Corporation into regular employees and show that this severe conflict among people who do not belong to the few rich illustrates the deceptive nature of meritocracy. As I argue, it not only widens the wealth gap between the wealthy few and the many poor but also engenders various forms of antagonism in society, transforms humans into a form of capital, incapacitates the register of the societal, and stirs up animosity towards discussions of political correctness. My claim is that while meritocratic rules are essential for a modern democratic and liberal society, they should be regarded as rules subordinate to a higher moral and political principle, such as solidarity.

Abstract

This paper considers meritocracy as a new social problem in Korea that has emerged since the IMF crisis in 1997. Drawing upon Daniel Markovitz’ recent analysis of meritocracy in America, I emphasize the connection between the neoliberalization of society and the popularization of the belief in meritocratic justice. I pay particular attention to the controversy over the conversion of irregular workers at the Incheon International Airport Corporation into regular employees and show that this severe conflict among people who do not belong to the few rich illustrates the deceptive nature of meritocracy. As I argue, it not only widens the wealth gap between the wealthy few and the many poor but also engenders various forms of antagonism in society, transforms humans into a form of capital, incapacitates the register of the societal, and stirs up animosity towards discussions of political correctness. My claim is that while meritocratic rules are essential for a modern democratic and liberal society, they should be regarded as rules subordinate to a higher moral and political principle, such as solidarity.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. Fraser, Nancy, "The Old Is Dying and the New Cannot Be Born: From Progressive Neoliberalism to Trump and Beyond" (2019), Verso
  2. Goldin, Claudia, "Handbook of Cliometrics", pp.147~178 (2019), Springer Nature
  3. Jang, Eun-Joo, "Confucian Characteristics of Korean Democracy: An Approach from a Republican Perspective", Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture, 34, pp.155~183 (2020)
  4. "인천공항 정규직은 공정한가" (2020), 전혜원[URL]
  5. 조문영, "빈곤과정 - 빈곤의 배치와 취약한 삶들의 인류학" (2022), Geulhangari
  6. Markovitz, Daniel, "The Meritocracy Trap: How America’s Foundational Myth Feeds Inequality, Dismantles the Middle Class, and Devours the Elite" (2019), Penguin Books
  7. 박권일, "한국의 능력주의 - 한국인이 기꺼이 참거나 죽어도 못 참는 것에 대하여" (2021), Idea
  8. "Cheong Wa Dae defends Incheon Airport’s Employment Plan against Public Outcry" (2020)[URL]
  9. "Human Capital Project" (2020)[URL]
  10. "The Human Capital Index 2020 Update: Human Capital in the Time of COVID-19" (2021)[URL]
  11. "GDP Ranking" (2023)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)