Jizha’s Dilemma: Rethinking Rang 讓 (“Renunciation”) in Confucian Moral and Political Philosophy
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examines a Neo-Confucian debate on the virtue of rang 讓 (“renunciation”), sparked by the case of Jizha 季札, the youngest prince of the state of Wu 吳國, who voluntarily abandoned the crown prince position designated by his father and elder brothers. Early Confucians and Han scholars generally viewed Jizha’s decision as consistent with both the Confucian moral value of rang and political traditions in Zhou ancestral legends. Later, however, commentators such as Cheng Yi 程頤 and Zhu Xi 朱熹 criticized Jizha’s action by stressing its negative outcome of political instability and grounding their critique in the principle of lixian 立賢 (“establishing the worthy”). These critiques generated a centuries-long controversy with Jizha’s defenders, yet its significance for Confucian reflections on political morality and rationality has been little appreciated by modern scholarship. This article provides an account of the complexity of Confucian judgments that balance moral ideals with outcomebased reasoning, and of the tension between leadership excellence and secure succession. It argues that Jizha’s critics articulated sophisticated principles for evaluating rang in practice, but their model of lixian faced serious feasibility issues. The article also introduces alternative perspectives to reconsider Jizha’s case and the Confucian discourse on political morality.
Abstract
This study examines a Neo-Confucian debate on the virtue of rang 讓 (“renunciation”), sparked by the case of Jizha 季札, the youngest prince of the state of Wu 吳國, who voluntarily abandoned the crown prince position designated by his father and elder brothers. Early Confucians and Han scholars generally viewed Jizha’s decision as consistent with both the Confucian moral value of rang and political traditions in Zhou ancestral legends. Later, however, commentators such as Cheng Yi 程頤 and Zhu Xi 朱熹 criticized Jizha’s action by stressing its negative outcome of political instability and grounding their critique in the principle of lixian 立賢 (“establishing the worthy”). These critiques generated a centuries-long controversy with Jizha’s defenders, yet its significance for Confucian reflections on political morality and rationality has been little appreciated by modern scholarship. This article provides an account of the complexity of Confucian judgments that balance moral ideals with outcomebased reasoning, and of the tension between leadership excellence and secure succession. It argues that Jizha’s critics articulated sophisticated principles for evaluating rang in practice, but their model of lixian faced serious feasibility issues. The article also introduces alternative perspectives to reconsider Jizha’s case and the Confucian discourse on political morality.