복합서술어 구문과 피동
A Complex Predicate Constructions and Passiveness
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Passiveness can be divided into two types: passive sentence which has passive rule in terms of Korean grammar and passive expression which has passive character semantically even if it doesn’t have any passive rule. However there are constructions for the character of passive sentence to be realized similarly among complex predicate constructions which have passive meanings. Thus I classified complex predicate constructions which have passive meanings into passive expression and pseudo passiveness. The complex predicate constructions, ‘되다, 받다, 당하다’, which have passive meanings are represented as pseudo passiveness in case their preceding constituents have negative meanings regarding subjects. The complex predicate constructions, ‘맞다, 입다, 나다’, are represented as pseudo passiveness in case their preceding constituents have negative meanings regarding subjects. In contrast, The complex predicate construction, ‘어지다’, which has passive meaning must not have passive verb corresponding to the preceding predicate and have a concrete noun or an abstract noun as the argument. Also it is valid when it has a concrete noun as the argument in case the preceding predicate has passive verb corresponding to itself.
Abstract
Passiveness can be divided into two types: passive sentence which has passive rule in terms of Korean grammar and passive expression which has passive character semantically even if it doesn’t have any passive rule. However there are constructions for the character of passive sentence to be realized similarly among complex predicate constructions which have passive meanings. Thus I classified complex predicate constructions which have passive meanings into passive expression and pseudo passiveness. The complex predicate constructions, ‘되다, 받다, 당하다’, which have passive meanings are represented as pseudo passiveness in case their preceding constituents have negative meanings regarding subjects. The complex predicate constructions, ‘맞다, 입다, 나다’, are represented as pseudo passiveness in case their preceding constituents have negative meanings regarding subjects. In contrast, The complex predicate construction, ‘어지다’, which has passive meaning must not have passive verb corresponding to the preceding predicate and have a concrete noun or an abstract noun as the argument. Also it is valid when it has a concrete noun as the argument in case the preceding predicate has passive verb corresponding to itself.
참고문헌 (14)
- 김경열, "현대국어 복합서술어의 특성과 논항구조 연구", 박사, 국어국문학과 국어학전공, pp.2014
- 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (1998), 두산동아
- 남수경, "조사 '을", 를'이 나타나는 피동문에 대하여, 2005, pp.41(1), 79~99[DOI]
- 성광수, "한국어 문장표현의 양상" (1999), 월인
- 손세모돌, "국어 보조용언 연구" (1996), 한국문화사
- 오민석, "한국어 보조동사 ‘지다’의 연구", 국어연구, 190 (2006), 국어연구회
- 이선웅, "현대국어의 보조용언 연구", 국어연구, 133 (1995), 국어연구회
- 이정택, "피동성 표현에 관한 연구–‘되다, 받다, 당하다’를 대상으로–", 한글, 251, pp.143~166 (2004), 한글학회
- 구성의 경우, "박사", 서울대학교 대학원, 2003
- 구성과 복합서술어, "어문연구", 2009, 77~98, pp.어문연구학회
- 임홍빈, "국어문법의 심층–어휘범주의 통사와 의미" (1998), 태학사
- 최규수, "'되다'와 '지다'의 피동성에 관하여", 한글, (269), pp.101~134 (2005), 한글학회
- 최형강, "피동문의 조건과 ‘받다, 당하다, 되다’ 구문의 재고", 어문학, (92), pp.159~190 (2006), 한국어문학회
- Palmer, F. R., "Grammatical Roles and Relations" (1994), Cambridge University Press