한국어 상 체계와 결과상의 유형 - 2차 상태의 내적 국면을 나타내는 비완망상 -
A Resultative Aspect in Korean: An Imperfective Aspect Representing the Internal Phase of Secondary State
2
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A resultative aspect denotes a state that was brought about by previous action, and is distinguished from a stative, a conclusive, or a completive. Because it represents a separated phase following a completion, it can be classified into a type of the imperfective aspect. In Korean, telic intransitive verbs and telic transitive verbs can express resultative meanings by means of a periphrastic construction that consists of a gerund(-e or -ko) and an auxiliary verb iss-. The typological diathesis types of Korean resultatives are the subjective resultative, the objective resultative, the possessive resultative, and the oblique objective resultative. In subjective resultative, the subject is co-referential with the subject of previous action, and this resultative is expressed by the intransitive verb and the complex resultative form -e iss-. The objective resultative form is made with the base verb, the passive suffix and the complex resultative form. However the possessive resultative and the oblique resultative use a common form that is -ko iss-.
Abstract
A resultative aspect denotes a state that was brought about by previous action, and is distinguished from a stative, a conclusive, or a completive. Because it represents a separated phase following a completion, it can be classified into a type of the imperfective aspect. In Korean, telic intransitive verbs and telic transitive verbs can express resultative meanings by means of a periphrastic construction that consists of a gerund(-e or -ko) and an auxiliary verb iss-. The typological diathesis types of Korean resultatives are the subjective resultative, the objective resultative, the possessive resultative, and the oblique objective resultative. In subjective resultative, the subject is co-referential with the subject of previous action, and this resultative is expressed by the intransitive verb and the complex resultative form -e iss-. The objective resultative form is made with the base verb, the passive suffix and the complex resultative form. However the possessive resultative and the oblique resultative use a common form that is -ko iss-.
참고문헌 (34)
- 고영근, "한국어의 시제, 서법, 동작상" (2004), 태학사
- 고영근, "동작상에 대한 이해", 한국어학, 30, pp.1~30 (2006), 한국어학회
- 김성화, "국어의 상 연구" (1991), 한신문화사
- 문숙영, "상 범주의 의미와 종류에 관한 몇 문제", 진단학보, (120), pp.129~158 (2014), 진단학회
- 박덕유, "국어의 상(相)종류와 특성에 대하여 : 문법적 동사상을 중심으로", 새국어교육, 55(1), pp.131~163 (1998), 한국국어교육학회
- 박덕유, "현대국어의 상, 시제, 서법에 관하여", 선청어문, 27(1), pp.679~718 (1999), 서울대학교 사범대학 국어교육과
- 박진호, "한국어의 동사와 문법요소의 결합 양상", 박사, 국어학, pp.2003
- 박진호, "중세국어에서 형용사와 결합하는 ‘-어 잇-’의 상적 의미", 구결연구, (17), pp.227~242 (2006), 구결학회
- 박진호, "시제, 상, 양태", 國語學, (60), pp.289~322 (2011), 국어학회
- 박진호, "A semantic map model approach to aspect in East Asian languages", 서울대학교 언어연구소 주최 학술회의 (2012)
- 송창선, "‘-고 있-’과 ‘-어 있-’의 기능과 의미 연구", 언어과학연구, (62), pp.179~204 (2012), 언어과학회
- 이건환, "언어 유형론 3", pp.55~65 (2008), 월인
- 이기동, "영어 시제와 상", 언어, 10, pp.99~130 (1989), 충남대학교 어학연구소
- 조민정, "한국어에서 상의 두 양상에 대한 고찰" (2007), 한국문화사
- 최동주, "문법 연구와 자료", pp.227~260 (1998), 태학사
- 한동완, "‘–고 있–’ 구성의 重義性에 대하여", 한국어 의미학, 5, pp.215~248 (1999), 한국어의미학회
- Bhat, D. S., "The Prominence of Tense, Aspect and Mood" (1999), John Benjamins Publishing
- Bybee, J. L., "Morphology : A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form" (1985), John Benjamins Publishing
- Bybee, J. L., "The Evolution of Grammar" (1994), The University of Chicago Press
- Chage, W. L., "American Indian and Indoeuropean Studies: Papers in Honor of Madison S. Beeler 16", pp.43~49 (1980), Walter de Gruyter
- Comrie, B., "Aspect" (1976), Cambridge University Press
- Crane, T. M., "Resultatives, progressives, statives, and relevance : The temporal pragmatics of the-ite suffix in Totela", Lingua, 133, pp.164~188 (2013)
- Dahl, Ö., "Tense and Aspect Systems" (1985), Basil Blackwell
- Ebert, K., "Typological Perspectives of Temporal Reference, Aspect, and Actionality 2", pp.185~203 (1995)
- Langacker, R., "Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction" (2008), Oxford University Press
- 나석주, "인지문법" (2013), 박이정
- Lee, H. S., "The Handbook of Korean Linguistics", pp.232~248 (2015), Wiley Blackwell
- Nedjalkov, V., "Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook 20", pp.928~940 (2001)
- Nedjalkov, V., "Typology of Resultative Constructions", pp.3~62 (1988), John Benjamins Publishing
- Radden, G., "Cognitive English Grammar" (2007), John Benjamins Publishing
- Shirai, Y., "Where the progressive and the resultative meet : Imperfective aspect in Japanese, Chinese, Korean and English", Studies in Language, 22(3), pp.661~692 (1998)
- Shibatani, M., "On the conceptual framework for voice phenomena", Linguistics, 44(2), pp.217~269 (2006)
- Smith, C. S., "The Parameter of Aspect" (1997), Kluwer
- 工藤眞由美, "애스펙트 텐스체계와 텍스트: 현대일본어의 시간표현" (2004), J＆C