한국어 접속사의 설정 기준
Criteria for Korean Conjunctions
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to assert the validity of the Korean conjunction and to examine the characteristics of its category. The system of parts of speech is composed of nine lists in Korean. Among them, the conjunction is a part of speech which is not recognized in Korean, because these vocabularies in Korean language have different characteristics from those of the European Languages. For these reasons, these words have been classified as conjunction adverb in adverbs. However, these words and adverbs behave significantly differently in Korean, therefore have an advantage in establishing a conjunction in Korean. In this discussion, we will distinguish conjunctions and adverbs based on criteria such as function, meaning, response, distribution, combination of research, and possibility of success. The Korean conjunction must be set as a separate part of speech that performs the function of connection, hence the connection word must also be recognized in the Korean sentence component. This explanation can well explain the nature of the words and minimize contradictions in the grammar system.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to assert the validity of the Korean conjunction and to examine the characteristics of its category. The system of parts of speech is composed of nine lists in Korean. Among them, the conjunction is a part of speech which is not recognized in Korean, because these vocabularies in Korean language have different characteristics from those of the European Languages. For these reasons, these words have been classified as conjunction adverb in adverbs. However, these words and adverbs behave significantly differently in Korean, therefore have an advantage in establishing a conjunction in Korean. In this discussion, we will distinguish conjunctions and adverbs based on criteria such as function, meaning, response, distribution, combination of research, and possibility of success. The Korean conjunction must be set as a separate part of speech that performs the function of connection, hence the connection word must also be recognized in the Korean sentence component. This explanation can well explain the nature of the words and minimize contradictions in the grammar system.
참고문헌 (26)
- 고려대학교 민족문화연구원, "고려대 한국어사전, 애플리케이션 프로그램 Ver.1.0.5", ~
- 교육부, "고등학교 문법" (1985), 대한교과서주식회사
- 교육부, "고등학교 문법" (1996), 대한교과서주식회사
- 교육과학기술부, "고등학교 문법" (2002), 두산
- "표준국어대사전", 국립국어원[URL]
- 김원경, "꼭 알아야 하는 한국어 문법" (2016), 한국문화사
- 김민수, "표준문법" (1968), 어문각
- 김윤경, "고급용 나라말본" (1948), 동명사
- 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (2014), 탑출판사
- 민현식, "이승욱 선생 회갑기념논총", pp.81~103 (1991)
- 박영목, "독서와 문법" (2014), 천재교육
- 박지은, "접속사 설정의 타당성 연구", 석사, pp.2017
- 손남익, "국어부사연구" (1995), 박이정
- 안종기, "한국어-영어 품사의 유형론적 비교연구", 언어학, 19(3), pp.213~232 (2011), 대한언어학회[DOI]
- 오규환, "‘또한’과 ‘또’의 분포 및 기능 변화와 그 원인", 國語學, (63), pp.195~220 (2012), 국어학회[DOI]
- 윤여탁, "독서와 문법" (2014), 미래엔
- 이관규, "학교문법론" (2012), 월인
- 이광정, "국어문법연구Ⅰ 품사" (2003), 역락
- 이삼형, "독서와 문법" (2014), 지학사
- 이희승, "새고등문법" (1957), 일조각
- 임지룡, "학교 문법과 문법 교육" (2008), 박이정
- 장영희, "접속부사에 대하여", 어문논총, 4, pp.137~152 (1994), 숙명여자대학교 한국어문학연구소
- 정교환, "국어 문장부사의 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1988
- 조성식, "영어학사전" (1990), 신아사
- 허웅, "문법" (1979), 과학사
- Jespersen, O., "문법 철학" (1987), 한신문화사