A Clausal Analysis of Resultative Constructions with X-key: Evidence from Corpus and Experiments
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Quite a few prior studies have classified the Korean resultative constructions into predicative resultatives and clausal resultatives. However, the current study argues that all the resultative constructions with X-key belong to the category of clausal resultative construction. This implies that X-key forms a fully saturated clause (not object control), in which the nominative subject of the secondary predicate can be omitted since Korean is a pro-drop language. We present corpus data and experimental results to reveal the existence of pro-drop in the resultative constructions. The linguistic findings are also consistent with the prediction of the pro-drop analysis: various kinds of resultative predicates can appear in the resultative constructions.
Abstract
Quite a few prior studies have classified the Korean resultative constructions into predicative resultatives and clausal resultatives. However, the current study argues that all the resultative constructions with X-key belong to the category of clausal resultative construction. This implies that X-key forms a fully saturated clause (not object control), in which the nominative subject of the secondary predicate can be omitted since Korean is a pro-drop language. We present corpus data and experimental results to reveal the existence of pro-drop in the resultative constructions. The linguistic findings are also consistent with the prediction of the pro-drop analysis: various kinds of resultative predicates can appear in the resultative constructions.
참고문헌 (17)
- Bresnan, J, "Control and complementation", Linguistic Inquiry, 13(3), pp.343~434 (1982)
- 최재웅, "피험자의 배경 변인이 수용성 판단에 영향을 끼치는가?", 언어와언어학, (74), pp.181~206 (2017), 언어연구소[DOI]
- Davies, W. D, "The Grammar of Raising and Control: A Course in Syntactic Argumentation" (2004), Blackwell Pub
- Horstein, N, "Movement and control", Linguistic Inquiry, 30(1), pp.69~96 (1999)
- Kim, J.-B, "Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics V, Cambridge: Department of Linguistics", pp.471~482 (1993), Harvard Univ
- Lee, J, "Towards a unified account of resultative constructions in Korean", Proceedings of the 30th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation(PACLIC), pp.501~510 (2016)
- 이주원, "An Experimental Study of ResultativeConstructions with X-key", 언어학 연구, (49), pp.249~274 (2018), 한국중원언어학회[DOI]
- Mathôt, S, "OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences", Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), pp.314~324 (2012)
- 오은정, "An Experimental Study of Yeo (2006, 2011): -Key", -Tolok Alternation of Resultative Constructions in Korean, 2016, pp.(23), 25~54[DOI]
- Polinsky, M, "Expanding the scope of control and raising", Syntax, 9(2), pp.171~192 (2006)
- Pollard, C, "Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar" (1994), University of Chicago Press
- Postal, P, "On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications" (1974), MIT Press
- Potsdam, E, "Backward raising", Syntax, 15(1), pp.75~108 (2012)
- R Core Team, "R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing" (2017), R Foundation for Statistical Computing
- Shibagaki, R, "Secondary predication in Chinese, Japanese, Mongolian and Korean", Ph.D, pp.2011
- Shim, J. Y, "The tense of resultatives: The case of Korean", Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, pp.337~350 (2007)
- Korean resultatives revisited: Complementation versus adjunction, "Son, M", 89~113, pp.Tromsø Working Papers on Language and Linguistics: Nordlyd 35 (2008)