본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『아학편(兒學編)』(1908)의 성모(聲母) 표기와 화음(華音)에 대하여

A Study on the Notation of Initials and the Chinese Phonology of Ahakphyeon Compiled by Ji Seok-Yeong in 1908

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper examines the aspects of the Chinese language notation of Ahakphyeon compiled by Ji Seok-yeong in 1908 and looks at the Chinese phonology that they reflect. For this purpose, by using Chinese characters in Hangul in this book, the current paper looked at what was the appearance of Chinese initials in this notation. In addition, this paper reviewed the common notions and differences of the consonant system of the Chinese language reflected in this notation and this text compared with the foreign language textbook of the previous period. As a result of this study, it is seen that the degree of reflection of palatalization is much wider in Ahakphyeon compared with the Junggan Nogeoldaeeonhae. This is understood to indicate that the spread of palatalization in Chinese was further advanced after the late 18th century. In alveolar, it reflects the palatalization of the alveolar. As a result, palatalization and non-palatalization coexist. What is noticeable is that there are many things related to individual change patterns that are understood on the basis of Beijing Mandarin, but there are many that are not. And the consonant group which used ‘o’ were widely used. This is seen in ‘ᅄ’, ‘ᅈ’, ‘ᅉ’, ‘ᅅ’ and so on. In the case of consonant group notations presented in this paper, it should be noted that in relation to affixing ‘ㅇ’, ‘ᅄ’, ‘ᅈ’, ‘ᅉ’ and ‘ᅅ’ It seems to be lighter and weaker than the sound of 'ㅅ'. However, it is necessary to examine the phonological characteristics of the sounds in which ‘ㅇ’ is written. In fact, they all have a common connection with the alveolar. In relation to the use of ‘ㅇ’ in the indication of the phonetic sounds, ‘ㅇ’ can be understood as indicating the common phonological qualities in the articulation position related to dental.

Abstract

This paper examines the aspects of the Chinese language notation of Ahakphyeon compiled by Ji Seok-yeong in 1908 and looks at the Chinese phonology that they reflect. For this purpose, by using Chinese characters in Hangul in this book, the current paper looked at what was the appearance of Chinese initials in this notation. In addition, this paper reviewed the common notions and differences of the consonant system of the Chinese language reflected in this notation and this text compared with the foreign language textbook of the previous period. As a result of this study, it is seen that the degree of reflection of palatalization is much wider in Ahakphyeon compared with the Junggan Nogeoldaeeonhae. This is understood to indicate that the spread of palatalization in Chinese was further advanced after the late 18th century. In alveolar, it reflects the palatalization of the alveolar. As a result, palatalization and non-palatalization coexist. What is noticeable is that there are many things related to individual change patterns that are understood on the basis of Beijing Mandarin, but there are many that are not. And the consonant group which used ‘o’ were widely used. This is seen in ‘ᅄ’, ‘ᅈ’, ‘ᅉ’, ‘ᅅ’ and so on. In the case of consonant group notations presented in this paper, it should be noted that in relation to affixing ‘ㅇ’, ‘ᅄ’, ‘ᅈ’, ‘ᅉ’ and ‘ᅅ’ It seems to be lighter and weaker than the sound of 'ㅅ'. However, it is necessary to examine the phonological characteristics of the sounds in which ‘ㅇ’ is written. In fact, they all have a common connection with the alveolar. In relation to the use of ‘ㅇ’ in the indication of the phonetic sounds, ‘ㅇ’ can be understood as indicating the common phonological qualities in the articulation position related to dental.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 강신항, "『화음계몽언해』 내 자음의 음계", 동방학지, 24, pp.167~192 (1980), 연세대학교 국학연구원
  2. 서미령, "《交隣要素》의 중국어 발음표기에 사용된 한글자모 연구 — 《華音啓蒙諺解》⋅《你呢貴姓》⋅《兒學篇》⋅《漢語獨學》과의 비교를 중심으로", 중국어문학지, (42), pp.311~341 (2013), 중국어문학회
  3. 서울특별시사 편찬위원회, "서울지명사전" (2009), 서울특별시사 편찬위원회
  4. 신용권, "≪번역노걸대⋅박통사≫의 한어음 표기와 관련된 몇 가지 문제에 대하여", 언어학, (62), pp.35~67 (2012), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
  5. 신용권, "《華音啓蒙諺解》의 漢語音 표기 연구", 중국문학, 81, pp.149~176 (2014), 한국중국어문학회[DOI]
  6. 이승연, "『화음계몽언해』의 표기와 문법", 국어사연구, 3, pp.125~151 (2002), 국어사학회
  7. 이윤자, "'老乞大'異本에 따른 表記와 內容의 變化 比較 -漢語本과 飜譯․諺解本의 각 樣相을 중심으로-", 어문론집, 52, pp.85~124 (2012), 중앙어문학회
  8. 이준환, "『아학편(兒學篇)』의 구성과 뜻풀이의 특징에 대하여", 반교어문연구, (36), pp.29~64 (2014), 반교어문학회
  9. 정 광, "번역노걸대 박통사의 중국어음 표기 연구-사성통해(四聲通解) 가운내(歌韻內) 제자(諸字)의 중성표기(中聲表記)를 중심으로", 국어국문학, 64, pp.1~26 (1974), 국어국문학회
  10. 정재영, "다산 정약용의 『아학편』" (2002), 태학사
  11. 최유리, "《아학편》중국어 음운체계 연구", 석사, 중어중문학, pp.2006
  12. 한성우, "근대 이행기 동아시아의 언어 지식-지석영 편찬 『아학편』의 언어 자료" (2010), 인하대 출판부
  13. 北京大學中國語言文學系 語音學敎硏室, "漢語方音字彙" (1989), 文字改革出版社
  14. 李珍華, "漢字古今音表" (1999), 中華書局
  15. 蔡瑛純, "從朝鮮對譯資料考近代漢語音韻之變遷,", 博士, pp.1986

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)