『論語』의 詩에 대한 고찰

Abstract

This study confirmed a meaning of 『Sigyeong(詩經, Book of Odes』 and of a poem, and of “Samusa(思無邪, there is no malicious intention in thinking)” as the process of exploring a meaning that a poem has in 『Noneo(論語, The Analects of Confucius』. In addition, it grasped a meaning of a poem through Jujaju(朱子注) and examined even a critical receptive attitude that Yuja(儒者) in Joseon Dynasty and a scholar of the Chinese classics(漢學者) in modern times recognize. 『Noneo(論語)』 is a Confucian classic(經書) that shows diverse philosophical opinions, which are broad, rich, and deep, focusing on Gongja(孔子, Confucius) and his literary person. In the context of the occasion, there is even a sharply critical view, which discerns daily life, as well as a meaning of the worldly honor, which has a philosophical meaning as guarantee. There is also logic that requires rational thinking of splitting or embracing a concept of a thing or a language. The omnidirectional interpretation and understanding about thing, human being, Sache(reason and honor) that 『Noneo(論語)』 shows can accept ordinary person according to own place(分數) as well as Confucianist(儒者)s' high-dimensional reading, and comes to have it as the range of vigilance(警戒) in everyday life. This understanding begins from highlighting a concept by making a philosophical meaning of a language consistent with the realization of daily object. In 『Noneo(論語)』, the abstract languages such as In(仁), Ui(義), Ye(禮), Ji(知), Chi(治), Hak(學), and Ak(樂) were realized as a specific situation by being reflected the accurately situational element through interpreting, accepting and criticizing Jujaju(朱子注), and persons. This is enough to be a correlative of communication as a conceptual language available for description and interpretation, with going one step forward from what closes through inferring it as a language of 『Noneo(論語)』. It is clarifying that even a poem in 『Noneo(論語)』 is available for understanding and interpretation as a language of universal life and a language for philosophical communication along with understanding as a literary language. Accordingly, this study will explore many views such as grasping & understanding a meaning, realizing & interpreting, and accepting & criticizing a concept of “poem” in a part of mentioning a poem in 『Sigyeong(詩經, Book of Odes』 between Gongja(孔子, Confucius) and disciple. Also, when “poem” in 『Sigyeong(詩經)』 is understood through epigram, it will be able to know, too, about how Confucian scholar(儒學者)s in future generations, especially, Confucianist(儒者)s in Joseon are understanding. This discussion doesn't aim to distinguish between right and wrong, but aims to grasp the openly academic attitude and perspective of all decent persons who interpret and understand the poems that are accepted in 『Noneo(論語)』.