日本 國字와 韓國 固有漢字의 고유성 판단 기준 설정의 필요성

Abstract

This paper discovered the Korean native Chinese characters which were flowed in Japanese, discussing the necessity of setting up the standards for judging the inherence of Japanese nation characters (日本 國字) and Korean native Chinese characters (韓國 固有漢字) from the four aspects. It is said in this paper that there were mistaken in judging the Japanese nation characters and Korean native Chinese characters since, in respects of judging them, the standards for judging the inherence were obscure. For example, the case of Japanese, there was a mistake in view of considering Chinese jeung (症) and sik (喰) as Japanese nation characters and Chinese jong (䑸) and geo (艍) as Korean native Chinese characters in Korean. In terms of understanding the differences between Japanese homographic nation characters and Korean native Chinese characters, it was mentioned that there was a difference in the word formation applied in both nations. Furthermore, ‘dae (垈), go (侤), seon (鐥), jeong (䰳), ma (䲈)’ are in existence in Japanese nation character and Korean native Chinese characters. The meanings of them, however, are different due to the distinction of the word formation. In addition, this paper demonstrated that in the case of Japanese nation characters, they have the meanings which are ‘dae(ぬた, sojeon) go(はたらく, saegakhaeseo(gominhaeseo) ilhada), seon(みずかね, sueun), jeong(ど)じょう, mikkulaji), ma(はも, gaetjangeo),’ whereas the Korean native Chinese characters have the meanings which are ‘dae(teo), go(dajim), seon(bokja), jeong(gamulchi), ma(samchi)’ Given the respects of the interrelation between Korean native Chinese characters and Japanese nation characters, in the ancient period, Korean native Chinese characters ‘ryang (椋, changgo), don (獤, dambi), [geumong (金瓮)](geumsokje janggun), il (鎰, jamulsoe)’ were flowed and used in Japanese. Furthermore, from the end of 19th century to around the 20th century, some Japanese nation characters were flowed in Korean, which were ‘sang(峠) (とうげ, gogae), jeon(畑) (はたけ, bat), dong(働)(はたらく, ilhada), jeong(柾)(まさめ, namuui goteun gyeol), seol(鱈)(たら, daegueo(大口魚)), ip(叺)(かます, gamani), in(籾)(もみ, byeo), ip(込)(こめる, soke damda), yak(鰯)(いわし, jeoneori, myeochi), seon(腺)(bunbisaem), chwe(膵)(chwejang).’ In respects of discovering the trace of Korean native Chinese characters which was left in the Japanese data, this paper identified the word formation which was applied to ‘seo(閪), sang(栍), seon(㵛)’ from the point which the meanings have left in the Japanese data which included respectively ‘ミヤコ(dohoeji), いのる(sinkke bilda), ヲサム(chiryohada).’