본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국 도시화 과정에서 농경지를 잃은 농민의 권익 보장에 관한 소고

A Study on the Guarantee Issues of Land-Lost Farmers' Rights and Interests in Urbanization Process of China

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

중국의 도시화 과정에서 중국 농민은 제대로 권익보장을 받지 못하고 있는 실정이다. 도시화과정에서 토지수용 등으로 근본 토대인 농경지를 잃은 후에 토지수용제도, 사회보장제도, 권리구제제도의 미비로 농민들의 생활은 적절한 배치를 못 받았고 생활수준이 떨어질 뿐만 아니라, 심지어 생존에 위험을 미치는 경우가 있다. 생활이나 생존을 위하여 농경지를 잃은 농민과 지방정부의 충돌이 잦아지고 계속 사회적 불안정 등 여러 사회문제를 불러일으키고 있다. 따라서 도시화 과정에서 토지수용의 제도적 단점을 분석하고 농경지를 잃게 된 농민들의 권익보장 체제를 이성적으로 구축하는 것이 중국에서는 중요한 이론문제일 뿐만 아니라 절실한 현실문제이기도 하다. 본고는 중국에서 농경지를 잃은 농민들의 권익보장에 중심을 두고 농민들의 권익이 침해당하는 객관적 현실과 제도적 문제점을 살펴보았다. 이러한 분석을 통하여 토지수용과정에서 공익성 토지와 경영성 토지에 대한 엄격한 구분이 없다는 점, 토지수용의 보상기준이 비교적 낮고 보상의 범위가 너무 좁다는 점, 사회보장제도의 미미로 취업 보장, 의료 보장과 최저생활 보장이 제대로 이루지지 못한다는 점, 권리구제제도에도 심각한 결함이 있다는 점이 문제점으로 파악되었다. 본고는 이러한 문제점의 해결을 위하여 도시화 과정을 겪은 선진국의 제도를 분석하고 중국적 현실에서 농경지를 잃은 농민의 권익보호를 위한 제도적 개선책을 완비된 토지수용제도의 구축, 사회보장제도의 구축, 절차적 구제체제의 구축의 관점에서 제시하였다.

Abstract

China being in the economic high-speed development period and the period of social transition is transiting to a modernized and industrialized country; urbanization is the inevitable pathway of social transition. Although the urbanization brings advanced civilization and scientific development for the public, largely occupying land and sacrificing farmers’ interest malpractice gradually appears. There is no doubt that urbanization as the rapier promotes the social progress and damages the owned interest of the farmers whose lands are occupied. With the deeply urbanization, the number of people losing land is greatly increasing by 4,000,000 each year. The fact that the farmers lose the guarantee of land directly affects their life and further affects the stability of society. Both the stability and harmony of rural society and the orderly development of national economy require that we pay attention to the protection of farmers' interest, which has significant meaning to building a harmonious socialist society and modernization construction. Therefore, the relation between promoting urbanization process and protecting interest of losing land farmers become a new subject to be urgently studied. It is not denied that at the present stage land-lost farmers couldn't fully enjoy the opportunity and guarantee of synchronous development of all orders of society. The system to protect land-lost farmers is imperfect, which is the reason the thesis analyzes around China land-lost farmers' interest protection. The scale of rights and interests is very wide. What this thesis elaborates is the deserving protected and survival-relevant rights of land-lost farmers during the urbanization. As a country ruling with the law, only legally confirming the right of the public can show the public benefit from the modern rule of law. And it can make the land-lost farmers feel care of modern rule of law, which will effectively prevent and solve the important conflicts in urbanization. The thesis clearly points out that the system deficiency and policy omission is the main reason that the land-lost farmers' interest is damaged. The administrative body seeks profit during the land acquisition process; the standard of the compensation is lower; the range is narrow; the social security system is too incomplete to play its value of social security system; the administrative adjudication and administrative review disobey with spirit of rule with law; the range of administrative proceeding is narrow; all these severely restrict the ways for the land-lost farmers to preserve right. The writer analyzes the ownership system, expropriation compensation system and land acquisition process of the USA, the UK and Germany, and believes that their ownership system, wide expropriation compensation range, higher compensation standards and strict acquisition process not only maintain the land-lost farmers' legal rights and interests, but also promote the social order's stability from the aspect of system. The writer adopts the system analysis method that quantitative analysis combines with qualitative analysis; the international comparison combines with national conditions analysis. It is pointed out that impeccable social security system is the premise and basis to realize the right to social security of land-lost farmers. The public benefit land should be strictly distinguished from the non-public benefit land, to restrict the acquisition land within the public benefit lands. In the guarantee of land-lost farmers' rights and interests, impeccable basic medication, social provision for the aged and the minimum standard of living should be established to dispel misgivings of land-lost farmers. And the neutral administrative adjudication body should be set up to submit administrative proceedings to reconsideration; allowing the land-lost farmers to submit administrative proceedings as the accuser and appropriately broaden the scope of accepting cases of administrative implementation.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. 柏駿, "失地農民問題—成因風險政策含義" (2012), 南京大學出版社
  2. 柴強, "各國(地區)土地制度改革" (1993), 北京經濟學院出版社
  3. 陳新民, "德國公法學基礎理論 (下冊)" (2001), 山東人民出版社
  4. 陳亞東, "失地農民社會保障制度研究一以重慶為例" (2008), 人民出版社
  5. 崔卓蘭, "我國農村社會保障法律問題研究" (2010), 中國法制出版社
  6. 杜偉, "失地農民權益保障的經濟學研究" (2009), 科學出版社
  7. 公維才, "中國農民養老保障論" (2007), 社會科學文獻出版社
  8. 黑格爾, "法哲學原理" (2013), 商務印書館
  9. 胡建森, "行政法學" (2003), 法律出版社
  10. 李國建, "中國被征地農民補償安置研究" (2009), 中國海洋大學出版社
  11. 李淑梅, "失地農民的社會保障制度研究" (2007), 中國經濟出版社
  12. 理查, "法律實用主義和民主" (2005), 中國政法大學出版社
  13. 劉海雲, "邊緣與異化:失地農民問題研究" (2007), 中國農業出版社
  14. 鹿心社, "研究征地問題探索改革之路 (二)" (2003), 中國大地出版社
  15. 孟德斯鳩, "論法的精神" (1963), 商務印書館
  16. 潘光輝, "失地農民社會保障和就業問題研究" (2009), 暨南大學出版社
  17. 沈開舉, "徵收、徵用與補償" (2006), 法律出版社
  18. 王作安, "中國城市近郊農民生存問題研究" (2007), 經濟科學出版社
  19. 嚴新明, "失地農民的就業和社會保障研究" (2008), 中國勞動社會保障出版社
  20. 約翰, "正義論" (1988), 中國社會科學出版社
  21. 張千帆, "美國聯邦憲法" (2011), 法律出版社
  22. 周秋光, "中國農村社會保障的理論與實踐" (2011), 中國社會出版社
  23. 周雲祥, "中國失地農民發展模式研究" (2012), 智慧財產權出版社
  24. "Interagency Land Acquisition Conference,Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions", The Appraisal Institute, ~ (2000)
  25. Murning, "Review of Compulsory Purchase and Land Compensation", Scottish Executive Central Research Unit, ~ (2001)
  26. 安勇華, "農村土地徵用中引發的問題及解決辦法探析", 榆林學院學報, 23 (2011)
  27. 曾國華, "發達國家土地徵收補償制度及對中國的借鑒", 國土資源科技管理, (4) (2006)
  28. 陳小君, "我國≪地管理法≫修訂歷史原則與制度", 政治與法律, 5 (2012)
  29. 杜江南, "城市化中農民土地權益保護的法律確實分析", 特區經濟, 7 (2012)
  30. 高驚生, "失地農民:一個日漸龐大的社會群體", 農業經濟, 2 (2012)
  31. 花文蒼, "國外解決失地農民問題的經驗及啟示", 江西農業學報, 8 (2007)
  32. 黃小波, "六大缺陷與被征地農民困境", 中國經濟導報, (1) (2011)
  33. 蔣中一, "進一步擴大農民土地財產權", 社會科學報, 151 (2005)
  34. 李江濤, "建立和完善城郊農民房屋拆遷法律問題探討", 黨史博采, 8 (2010)
  35. 柳經緯, "我國土地權利駐地的變遷與現狀", 海峽法學, 1 (2010)
  36. 王利明, "論我國農村土地權利制度的完善", 中國法學, 1 (2012)
  37. 袁曉東, "不動產徵收補償法律制度的基本原則", 中國不動產法研究, 2 (2012)
  38. 張恒, "農民醫療保障權的立法思考", 法制與社會, 21 (2009)
  39. 張英洪, "城鄉一體化的根本:破除雙重二元結構", 調研世界, 12 (2010)
  40. 趙萬一, "中國農民權利的制度重構及其實現途徑", 中國法學, 3 (2012)
  41. 이영수, "중국의 토지수용과 보상제도에 관한 연구", 국토연구, 45, pp.105~118 (2005), 국토연구원

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)