본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

신용카드약관상 카드분실과 법적 쟁점 - 대법원 2009. 10. 15. 선고 2009다31970 판결의 평석을 중심으로 -

A Study on legal issues on the case of lose of credit cards - focused on the supreme court case(2009Da31970) -

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Nowadays credit cards take very important role in life. Therefore, it happens very often that people confront problems with the use of credit cards. Standard contract terms, on the other hand, has important roles in modern, mass product society, especially in the field of bank. But the interest of the users can be neglected by the unfair standard contract terms about the use of credit cards. This study concentrates on analysing the contract terms about the use of credit cards. The contents of standard contract terms about the use of credit cards should be valid in regard of korean unfair contract terms act and jurisdiction. Standard contract terms about the use of credit cards, which is made by Korean Fair Trade Commission, has some problems. In regard of § 7 unfair contract terms act and its interpretation it is recommended that the contract terms should be revised in concord with the common interpretation of that article. The author has also analyzed 3 court cases about credit cards. The burden of proof clause can be invalid in regard of § 14 korean unfair contract terms act. Finally, some standard contract terms of credit cards is too vague. Therefore, it should be defined more clearly. The standard contract terms of the use of credit cards, in short, has some problems. It should be revised clearly afterwards.

Abstract

Nowadays credit cards take very important role in life. Therefore, it happens very often that people confront problems with the use of credit cards. Standard contract terms, on the other hand, has important roles in modern, mass product society, especially in the field of bank. But the interest of the users can be neglected by the unfair standard contract terms about the use of credit cards. This study concentrates on analysing the contract terms about the use of credit cards. The contents of standard contract terms about the use of credit cards should be valid in regard of korean unfair contract terms act and jurisdiction. Standard contract terms about the use of credit cards, which is made by Korean Fair Trade Commission, has some problems. In regard of § 7 unfair contract terms act and its interpretation it is recommended that the contract terms should be revised in concord with the common interpretation of that article. The author has also analyzed 3 court cases about credit cards. The burden of proof clause can be invalid in regard of § 14 korean unfair contract terms act. Finally, some standard contract terms of credit cards is too vague. Therefore, it should be defined more clearly. The standard contract terms of the use of credit cards, in short, has some problems. It should be revised clearly afterwards.

참고문헌 (9)

  1. 정호열, "경제법" (2006), 박영사
  2. 정찬우, "신용카드시장의 현황과 과제" (2005), 한국금융연구원
  3. 황진자, "신용카드 약관의 적정화 방안 연구" (2006), 한국소비자보호원
  4. Ansgar Staudinger, "Das Transparenzgebot im AGB-Gesetz" (1999), WM
  5. v. Hoyningen-Huene, "Die Inhaltskontrolle nach", AGB-Gesetz, 9 (1991)
  6. Ulmer, "AGB Kommentar", Aufl, 4 (1982)
  7. Wolf, "AGB-Gesetz", Aufl, 4 (1999), C. H. Beck
  8. 심준섭, "불확실성과 정책오차의 이중성(duality of policy errors) : 신용카드사 규제정책을 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 38(6), pp.131~153 (2004), 한국행정학회
  9. 최병규, "은행여신거래기본약관,개별약정서와 약관규제", 경영법률, 12 (2001), 한국경영법률학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)