본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

임의법규에서 벗어나는 약관의 정당성 인정기준에 관한 연구

A Study on justification criteria of deviation clauses from dispositive law

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

In modern society, standard contract terms play very important role in everyday transactions. The interest of the clients can be neglected by the unfair standard contract terms. Every person has bank account. Bank trade plays significant role in everyday life of the people. Korean people want to have their own houses. Therefore they borrow money on their house. This is so called mortage loans. Subprime mortage was a cause of the global financial crisis in the year of 2007, 2008. It happens very often that people confront problems with the use of inadequate standard contract terms. This study concentrates on analysing justification criteria of deviation clauses from dispositive law. The contents of standard contract terms about bank business should be valid in regard of korean unfair contract terms act and jurisdiction. There were some discussions about the problem, who should bear the fee for getting mortage in korea. The old standard contract terms about bank business allows the selection of the parties in this point. But the korean fair trade commission has revised the standard contract terms about bank business. It has also enforced the new clauses to all banks. The bank association sued the fair trade commission. The seoul high court accepted the claim of the bank association. But the supreme court has broken off the decision and refer the case back to seoul high court. The seoul high court has interpreted according to the direction of supreme court. The attitude of the korean court toward clauses about bank business, in short, has problems. The older clauses are adequate in regard of the interest division of the parties. On the other hand, standard contract terms can deviate from dispositive law. But in that case the rule of minimum deviation should be applied. The dispositive law has set a standard for the people. Because of the principle of private autonomy the deviation from the dispositive law should be allowed. But we should find out the right criterium of the acceptance of the clauses according to the standard contract terms law and principles. The author has in this article studied the justification- criteria of deviation clauses from dispositive law. By the analysis, he has seen especially the german literature.

Abstract

In modern society, standard contract terms play very important role in everyday transactions. The interest of the clients can be neglected by the unfair standard contract terms. Every person has bank account. Bank trade plays significant role in everyday life of the people. Korean people want to have their own houses. Therefore they borrow money on their house. This is so called mortage loans. Subprime mortage was a cause of the global financial crisis in the year of 2007, 2008. It happens very often that people confront problems with the use of inadequate standard contract terms. This study concentrates on analysing justification criteria of deviation clauses from dispositive law. The contents of standard contract terms about bank business should be valid in regard of korean unfair contract terms act and jurisdiction. There were some discussions about the problem, who should bear the fee for getting mortage in korea. The old standard contract terms about bank business allows the selection of the parties in this point. But the korean fair trade commission has revised the standard contract terms about bank business. It has also enforced the new clauses to all banks. The bank association sued the fair trade commission. The seoul high court accepted the claim of the bank association. But the supreme court has broken off the decision and refer the case back to seoul high court. The seoul high court has interpreted according to the direction of supreme court. The attitude of the korean court toward clauses about bank business, in short, has problems. The older clauses are adequate in regard of the interest division of the parties. On the other hand, standard contract terms can deviate from dispositive law. But in that case the rule of minimum deviation should be applied. The dispositive law has set a standard for the people. Because of the principle of private autonomy the deviation from the dispositive law should be allowed. But we should find out the right criterium of the acceptance of the clauses according to the standard contract terms law and principles. The author has in this article studied the justification- criteria of deviation clauses from dispositive law. By the analysis, he has seen especially the german literature.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 고동원, "근저당권 설정 비용의 부담 주체에 관한 소고", 법률신문 제4047호, ~ (2012)
  2. 공정거래위원회, "약관규제의 실제" (2008)
  3. 신현윤, "경제법" (2006), 법문사
  4. 양창수, "독일민법전" (2008), 박영사
  5. 이기수, "경제법 제8판" (2009), 세창출판사
  6. 이은영, "약관규제론" (1984), 박영사
  7. 張敬煥, "約款規制法 一般條項에 關한 연구 : 獨逸約款規制法 弟9條를 中心으로", 박사, pp.1990
  8. 정호열, "경제법" (2006), 박영사
  9. 최병규, "은행근저당권설정비 부담주체에 대한 약관의 효력 - 대법원 2010.10.14. 선고 2008두23184 판결에 대한 평석을 중심으로 -", 상사판례연구, 24(1), pp.161~195 (2011), 한국상사판례학회
  10. 황남석, "근저당권설정비용의 부담주체에 관한 고찰", 은행법학회 2012년 8월 특별정책세미나자료집 (2012), 은행법학회
  11. v. Hoyningen-Huene, "Die Inhaltskontrolle nach § 9 AGB-Gesetz" (1991), Heidelberg
  12. Larenz, "Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Rechts, 9. Aufl" (2004)
  13. Leenen, "Typus und Rechtsfindung" (1971)
  14. Palandt, "Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, 69. Aufl" (2010)
  15. Soergel, "Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, 12. Aufl" (1999)
  16. Ulmer, "AGB Kommentar, 9. Aufl" (2001)
  17. Wolf, "AGB-Gesetz, 4. Aufl" (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (22건)