본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

주택임차권 대항력의 개선에 관한 연구

A Study on The House Leaseholder’s Opposing Power and Its Improvement

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Residence is so necessary to manage value life as a human beings that residental stabilization is the basic matter for all citizens. Regarding Housing Lease Protection Act which was established for the purpose of protecting the right of lease of housing tenants and the stability of their living life and is currently enforced through several revision. This study reviews the theories and precedent cases related to the opposing power system of the housing leasehold interest. This study also tries to investigate the legal interpretation and its revision in the view of legal and systematic sides. The contents of this study is followed. First, Housing Lease Protection Act Article 3 Paragraph 1(resident registration as counteract requisite) : Even though there were opposing opinions from the beginning of legislation, the act’s main roles of providing safety for leased housing trade and preventing the rampancy of fake tenants and the fact that now its roots are firmly stable in the society and is well known to the people are enough to be the reasons of continuing the act. Housing Lease Protection Act 2 of Article 3 Paragraph 1 : There are no problems with the paragraph itself but considering the fact that the preferential payment right of tenants is protected highly above the level of real right, it will rather be better to state the amount of deposits in resident registrations or lease registers. Furthermore, it will be even better to change the above paragraph and grant tenants the right to claim for auctions. Second,the occurring period of opposing power system should be the immediate date from the next date of resident registration. Third, Housing Lease Protection Act 3 of Article 3(leasehold right registration order) : The above article about leasehold right registration order should be excluded. It confuses the law system and the effectiveness is doubtful. Through the revisions mentioned in this study, the regulation in the opposing power system of housing leasehold interest will provide a practical function for protecting a lessee as a household. The revised and complemented regulation will also be adopted to the practical legal activity in housing tenancy protection, especially in lessee’s right. This study intends to make an analysis on the major considerations to resolving the problems directly related to protecting the lessee as regards the overall content of the Housing Lease Protection Law for the residential stabilization of the homeless masses.

Abstract

Residence is so necessary to manage value life as a human beings that residental stabilization is the basic matter for all citizens. Regarding Housing Lease Protection Act which was established for the purpose of protecting the right of lease of housing tenants and the stability of their living life and is currently enforced through several revision. This study reviews the theories and precedent cases related to the opposing power system of the housing leasehold interest. This study also tries to investigate the legal interpretation and its revision in the view of legal and systematic sides. The contents of this study is followed. First, Housing Lease Protection Act Article 3 Paragraph 1(resident registration as counteract requisite) : Even though there were opposing opinions from the beginning of legislation, the act’s main roles of providing safety for leased housing trade and preventing the rampancy of fake tenants and the fact that now its roots are firmly stable in the society and is well known to the people are enough to be the reasons of continuing the act. Housing Lease Protection Act 2 of Article 3 Paragraph 1 : There are no problems with the paragraph itself but considering the fact that the preferential payment right of tenants is protected highly above the level of real right, it will rather be better to state the amount of deposits in resident registrations or lease registers. Furthermore, it will be even better to change the above paragraph and grant tenants the right to claim for auctions. Second,the occurring period of opposing power system should be the immediate date from the next date of resident registration. Third, Housing Lease Protection Act 3 of Article 3(leasehold right registration order) : The above article about leasehold right registration order should be excluded. It confuses the law system and the effectiveness is doubtful. Through the revisions mentioned in this study, the regulation in the opposing power system of housing leasehold interest will provide a practical function for protecting a lessee as a household. The revised and complemented regulation will also be adopted to the practical legal activity in housing tenancy protection, especially in lessee’s right. This study intends to make an analysis on the major considerations to resolving the problems directly related to protecting the lessee as regards the overall content of the Housing Lease Protection Law for the residential stabilization of the homeless masses.

참고문헌 (49)

  1. 곽용진, "민사특별법" (2008), 법률서원
  2. 곽윤직, "채권각론 제6판" (2007), 박영사
  3. 민일영, "주택의 경매와 임차인 보호에 관한 실무연구" (2005), 경인문화사
  4. 박해식, "주택임대차보호법 해설의 법률지식" (2000), 청림출판
  5. 송덕수, "신민법강의" (2008), 박영사
  6. 윤경, "부동산경매의 실무(하)" (1999), 법률정보센타
  7. 윤천희, "개정주택임대차보호법 해설" (1985), 문조사
  8. 이은영, "채권각론 제5판" (2007), 박영사
  9. 하경일, "실무경매와 임대차보호법" (1987), 가인
  10. 백경일, "債權總論要義" (2010), 리슈미디어
  11. 近江辛治, "債權總論, 第3版" (2010), 成文堂
  12. 川井 健, "債權總論" (2009), 有斐閣
  13. 川井 健, "債權各論, 補訂版" (2010), 有斐閣
  14. 內田 貴, "債權各論 第2版" (2009), 東京大學出版會
  15. 內田 貴, "債權總論·擔保物權" (2011), 東京大學出版會
  16. 渡辺 晋, "借地借家法の解說" (2010), 住宅新報社
  17. 강종쾌, "주택임대차의 양도·전대와 대항력의 승계", 대법원판례해설, (9) (1989), 법원도서관
  18. 고상용, "주택임대차 보호법의 제문제", 판례월보, (147) (1982), 판례월보사
  19. 고상용, "주택임대차보호법의 문제점과 그 개선방안", 민사법학, (4) (1985), 한국민사법학회
  20. 고상용, "주택임대차보호법 개정안의 제문제(하)", 법률신문, 법률신문사, ~ (1998)
  21. 고용철, "주택임대차보호법에 관한 연구", 논문집, 16 (1988), 충남대법률행정연구소
  22. 권영상, "주택임차인의 대항력, 우선변제권", 창원지방변호사회지, (1) (1995), 창원지방변호사회
  23. 김상수, "강제집행법상의 몇 가지 문제점", 저스티스, 30(2) (1997), 한국법학원
  24. 김상용, "주택임대차에 있어서 순위에 의한 우선특권", 사법행정 (1993), 한국사법행정학회
  25. 김성욱, "주택임대차 제도의 개선방향에 관한 연구", 법학연구, 52(2), pp.427~449 (2011), 법학연구소
  26. 김은집, "주택임대차보호법 제3조 제1항의 대항력의 내용", 형평과 정의, 4 (1989), 대구지방변호사회
  27. 김진현, "우리 주택임대차제도의 문제점에 관한 비교법적 연구", 민사법학, (13) (1996), 한국민사법학회
  28. 박경량, "住宅賃貸借保護制度의 沿革과 改善方案", 토지법학, 24(1), pp.187~224 (2008), 한국토지법학회
  29. 박종두, "부동산 임차권의 대항력", 강남대학교논문집, 25 (1994), 강남대학교출판부
  30. 박해식, "임차권등기명령제도", 민사법학, (18) (2000), 한국민사법학회
  31. 사동천, "주택임대인의 지위승계와 임차인보호", 민사법학, (38), pp.69~99 (2007), 한국민사법학회
  32. 소건영, "주택임대차보호법의 대항력: 주민등록을 중심으로", 법학연구, (33), pp.87~109 (2009), 한국법학회
  33. 소재선, "임차권등기명령제도 신설의 과제와 문제점", 경희법학, 33(1) (1998), 경희법학연구소
  34. 오시영, "전세권과 주택임대차의 대항력과 우선변제권 비교 (대법원 2007. 6. 28. 선고 2004다69741 판결)", 민사법학, (44), pp.127~171 (2009), 한국민사법학회
  35. 오용호, "부동산경매와 임차권", 재판자료, 36 (1987), 법원행정처
  36. 윤경, "경매(입찰)에서의 주택임차권 등기권자의 지위", 법조 (2000), 법조협회
  37. 이범주, "주택임차권의 대항력 -주택임대차보호법의 경우에 한정하여-, In 민사법의 제문제(방순원고회기념논문집)" (1984), 박영사
  38. 이윤승, "주택임대차에 있어서 소액임차인의 보호", 사법논집, 19 (1988), 법원행정처
  39. 이은영, "주택임대차보호법의 개정에 관한 연구", 법조, 31(4) (1982), 법조협회
  40. 이은희, "주택임차권의 공시방법으로서의 주민등록", 민주법학, 통권 : 20 (2001), 민주주의법학연구회
  41. 이준현, "賃貸人에 의한 임차목적물의 讓渡와 賃貸借關係에 대한 영향", 비교사법, 11(2), pp.175~204 (2004), 한국비교사법학회
  42. 이준현, "계약인수와 임차권의 양도", 저스티스, (89), pp.5~34 (2006), 한국법학원
  43. 이창석, "<특별기고 3> 不動産競賣에 있어서 住宅賃借人 保護에 관한 硏究", 부동산학보, (29), pp.278~293 (2007), 한국부동산학회
  44. 장동훈, "외국인 거주자의 주택임대차 실태 및 개선방안", 대한부동산학회지, 19(1) (2002), 대한부동산학회
  45. 장영희, "주택 임대차에 관한 제도적 개선방안 연구", 주택연구, 18(1) (2000), 한국주택학회
  46. 조용완, "임대차의 대항력", 재판자료, 32 (1986), 법원행정처
  47. 전장헌, "주택임차권의 대항력에 관한 연구", 법학논총, 28 (2004), 단국대학교 법학연구소
  48. 제철웅, "주택임대차보호법 제3조 제1항의 대항요건에 관하여", 법정논총, 37 (2002), 중앙대학교 법학대학
  49. 최종, "경매절차에 있어서 임차인", 사법논집, 18 (1987), 법원행정처

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (21건)