한국의 이민정책과 이민정책 총괄기구설치에 관한 논의와 과제
A Study for Necessity of Organization in Charge of Immigration Policy
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Current immigration policy in Republic of Korea can be divided into foreigner influx policy and social integration policy combining foreigners and local citizens. Visa system improvement and toleration on dual citizenship among those policies are in progress in order to attract foreign human resources. However, such immigration control policy alone is circumscribed to attract talented foreigners into the country. In order to lure them, social environment development, which allows foreigners to live together, along with other aspects of governmental support, such as children education, social welfare, and tax benefit is more important. For immigrant workers, who are technical posts of production, they have been contributing to produce industrial manpower, by working in labor section most Koreans avoid getting into. On the other hand, the control cultivation to prevent illegal immigration along with accurate analysis on proper demand of manpower would have to be preceded due to the fact that an indiscreet influx of foreign simple technical posts of production could increase social cost in a long run. In light of social integration policy, multicultural policy on immigrants is blamed for being in progress competitively overlapping among the branches of government. Enactment of fundamental law systematically integrating diffuse individual laws and establishing further individual law for immigration policy need to be considered in order to coordinate the interministerially overlapping elements and to establish interface system. Moreover, encouraging conducting more efficient immigration policy, by expanding and reorganizing foreigner immigration bureau to ‘immigration⋅multicultural office(an assumed title)’ could be under consideration. Establishing the conception of immigration policy and medium and long term policy including new organization considering immigrants’ percentage of the current population, by integrating ‘immigration policy committee in Korea(committee person Prime Minister)’, ‘foreign human resources policy committee(committee person Minister of the Prime Minister’s Office)’, and ‘multicultural family policy committee(committee person Minister of the Prime Minister’s Office)’, which are currently divided as individual committees under the Prime Minister in order to control appropriate influx of foreign professionals and technical posts of production,illegal immigrants, and social integration of marriagebased immigrants need to be seriously considered as a monitoring committee taking a role as a control tower for immigration policy.
Abstract
Current immigration policy in Republic of Korea can be divided into foreigner influx policy and social integration policy combining foreigners and local citizens. Visa system improvement and toleration on dual citizenship among those policies are in progress in order to attract foreign human resources. However, such immigration control policy alone is circumscribed to attract talented foreigners into the country. In order to lure them, social environment development, which allows foreigners to live together, along with other aspects of governmental support, such as children education, social welfare, and tax benefit is more important. For immigrant workers, who are technical posts of production, they have been contributing to produce industrial manpower, by working in labor section most Koreans avoid getting into. On the other hand, the control cultivation to prevent illegal immigration along with accurate analysis on proper demand of manpower would have to be preceded due to the fact that an indiscreet influx of foreign simple technical posts of production could increase social cost in a long run. In light of social integration policy, multicultural policy on immigrants is blamed for being in progress competitively overlapping among the branches of government. Enactment of fundamental law systematically integrating diffuse individual laws and establishing further individual law for immigration policy need to be considered in order to coordinate the interministerially overlapping elements and to establish interface system. Moreover, encouraging conducting more efficient immigration policy, by expanding and reorganizing foreigner immigration bureau to ‘immigration⋅multicultural office(an assumed title)’ could be under consideration. Establishing the conception of immigration policy and medium and long term policy including new organization considering immigrants’ percentage of the current population, by integrating ‘immigration policy committee in Korea(committee person Prime Minister)’, ‘foreign human resources policy committee(committee person Minister of the Prime Minister’s Office)’, and ‘multicultural family policy committee(committee person Minister of the Prime Minister’s Office)’, which are currently divided as individual committees under the Prime Minister in order to control appropriate influx of foreign professionals and technical posts of production,illegal immigrants, and social integration of marriagebased immigrants need to be seriously considered as a monitoring committee taking a role as a control tower for immigration policy.
참고문헌 (12)
- 설동훈, "이주민 정책 총괄기구 설치 관련 쟁점 및 과제, 이주민정책총괄기구 설치방안", 국회입법조사처 전문가 간담회 발표문, pp.14~30 (2013)
- 이규홍, "우리나라 이민정책의 개선 방향", 법조, 54(1), pp.217~254 (2005), 법조협회
- 이민정책과 다문화주의,In 한국적 ‘다문화주의’의 이론화, "이혜경", 한국사회학회 동북아시대위원회, 219~250, pp.용역과제 07-7 (2007)
- 이혜경, "한국 이민정책의 수렴현상: 확대와 포섭의 방향으로", 한국사회학, 42(2), pp.104~137 (2008), 한국사회학회
- 최효진, "저출산·고령화 대응방안으로서 이민정책과 이민자지원정책에 대한 일반인의 태도", 석사, 가족학, pp.2009
- 한승준, "우리나라 다문화정책의 거버넌스구축에 관한 연구", 제4차다문화사회 정책 포럼 자료집, pp.2~24 (2008), 한국여성정책연구원
- 국세청, "외국인근로자를 위한 연말정산안내", ~ (2009)
- 서기원, "국회입법조사처 전문가 간담회 자료집", ~ (2013)
- 외국인정책위원회, "제1차 외국인정책 기본계획 2008-2012(2009년도중앙부처 시행계획)", ~ (2008)
- 이민정책에 관한 연구, "유길상", 대통령 자문 고령화 및 미래사회위원회, ~ (2005)
- 저출산ㆍ고령사회 를 위한 이민정책의 개선과제, "유의정", 회입법조사처, ~ (2010)
- 다문화정책의 추진실태와 개선방향, "유의정", 국회입법조사처, ~ (2010)
