본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

1950년대 초 臺灣의 反共과 대륙 反攻計劃

Anti-Communist Policy and a Recapture of Mainland Plan of Taiwan in the 1950s

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper focuses on the background and meaning of Taiwan’s anti-Communism policy and the mainland recapture plan in the early 1950s. After Nationalist government retreated to Taiwan, the survival of the Kuomintang government was uncertain. In order to survive, Taiwan’s Nationalist government desperately needed international recognition and support. But the United States declared not to intervene in China’s civil war and gave up Taiwan. The protection and assistance of the United States was imperative to the survival of Taiwan, but the United States was indifferent to it. Taiwan and other Asian countries tried to conclude collective security system in order to ensure the safety, through which Taiwan anticipated to draw attention and aid of the United States. It was the Korean war that helped Taiwan to escape from the crisis of survival. The war itself was threatening to the survival of Taiwan as well as South Korea. The Korean War, however, paved way for the interest and the eventual intervention of the United States in the affaire of Taiwan. Under the auspices of the United States, Taiwan could solve Chinese representative problem of the UN and the Taiwan’s international position. Because of power imbalance between Taiwan and mainland China, Taiwan had to admit that she could not put a recapture of the mainland plan into practice. Instead, Taiwan actively tried to build a regional security system for the purpose of nation survival. Taiwan wished that a regional security system got a foothold for a recapture of the mainland plan. Since Taiwan and Korea seemed to be of like minds in terms of anti-Communism and were in similar circumstances, two countries maintained the mutually cooperative relationship, and Taiwan used it to promote the recovery of the mainland plan. Taiwan made vain effort to conclude an offensive and defensive alliance with South Korea to jointly fight China proper and North Korea, which was not realized because of the opposition from the United States and the passivity of South Korea and Southeast Asia. In the Cold War era, the role of the United States in the national survival of East Asia was critical. Taiwan tried to establish a regional collective security system in Asia and carry forward the mainland recapture plan for the purpose of ensuring the survival and security. Since it was contrary to America’s policy of the East Asia, Taiwan’s policy was not executed. However, Taiwan’s actions were able to get the attention of the United States. It was in American regional interest in East Asia to protect and contain Taiwan in bilateral mutual defense treaties than allowing Taiwan to assume aggressive stance towards the mainland China and to increase instability in the region. In conclusion, Taiwan had to give up the mainland recapture plan. Instead Taiwan could secure nation survival and security. In the 1950s, Taiwan’s anti-Communist policy and the mainland recapture plan were the crucial alternatives for her existence. One can say that Taiwan was successful in surviving in some degree.

Abstract

This paper focuses on the background and meaning of Taiwan’s anti-Communism policy and the mainland recapture plan in the early 1950s. After Nationalist government retreated to Taiwan, the survival of the Kuomintang government was uncertain. In order to survive, Taiwan’s Nationalist government desperately needed international recognition and support. But the United States declared not to intervene in China’s civil war and gave up Taiwan. The protection and assistance of the United States was imperative to the survival of Taiwan, but the United States was indifferent to it. Taiwan and other Asian countries tried to conclude collective security system in order to ensure the safety, through which Taiwan anticipated to draw attention and aid of the United States. It was the Korean war that helped Taiwan to escape from the crisis of survival. The war itself was threatening to the survival of Taiwan as well as South Korea. The Korean War, however, paved way for the interest and the eventual intervention of the United States in the affaire of Taiwan. Under the auspices of the United States, Taiwan could solve Chinese representative problem of the UN and the Taiwan’s international position. Because of power imbalance between Taiwan and mainland China, Taiwan had to admit that she could not put a recapture of the mainland plan into practice. Instead, Taiwan actively tried to build a regional security system for the purpose of nation survival. Taiwan wished that a regional security system got a foothold for a recapture of the mainland plan. Since Taiwan and Korea seemed to be of like minds in terms of anti-Communism and were in similar circumstances, two countries maintained the mutually cooperative relationship, and Taiwan used it to promote the recovery of the mainland plan. Taiwan made vain effort to conclude an offensive and defensive alliance with South Korea to jointly fight China proper and North Korea, which was not realized because of the opposition from the United States and the passivity of South Korea and Southeast Asia. In the Cold War era, the role of the United States in the national survival of East Asia was critical. Taiwan tried to establish a regional collective security system in Asia and carry forward the mainland recapture plan for the purpose of ensuring the survival and security. Since it was contrary to America’s policy of the East Asia, Taiwan’s policy was not executed. However, Taiwan’s actions were able to get the attention of the United States. It was in American regional interest in East Asia to protect and contain Taiwan in bilateral mutual defense treaties than allowing Taiwan to assume aggressive stance towards the mainland China and to increase instability in the region. In conclusion, Taiwan had to give up the mainland recapture plan. Instead Taiwan could secure nation survival and security. In the 1950s, Taiwan’s anti-Communist policy and the mainland recapture plan were the crucial alternatives for her existence. One can say that Taiwan was successful in surviving in some degree.

참고문헌 (51)

  1. 國史館中華民國史外交志編纂委員會, "中華民國外交志 (初稿)" (2002), 三民書局
  2. 梁敬錞, "中美關係論文集" (1982), 聯京出版事業公司
  3. 傅啓學, "中國外交史 上" (1957), 臺灣商務印書館
  4. 黃正銘, "中國外交史論集 2" (1957), 中華文化出版事業委員會
  5. 노기영, "이승만정권의 태평양동맹 추진과 지역안보구상", 지역과 역사, (11), pp.186~223 (2002), 부경역사연구소
  6. 최영호, "이승만의 태평양동맹 구상과 아시아민족반공연맹 결성", 국제정치논총, 39(2) (1999)
  7. 박진희, "이승만의 대일인식과 태평양동맹 구상", 역사비평, (76), pp.90~118 (2006), 역사문제연구소
  8. 金正培, "미국의 세계전략적 관점에서 본 『태평양 연맹』논의의 성격", 석사, 사학과, pp.1990
  9. 조무형, "아시아민족반공연맹(APACL)의 창설과 좌절", 세계정치, 29(2) (2008)
  10. 이호재, "한국외교정책의 이상과현실 :해방 8년 민족갈등기의 반성" (1986), 법문사
  11. "美國對臺灣之態度", 臺灣中央硏究院近代史硏究所所藏, 外交部檔案 􀀠11,檔號:411.2, pp.64~65
  12. "The Charge in the Philippines(Lockett) to the Secretary of State", Foreign Relations of the United States, 7(2), pp.1123~1125 (1949)
  13. "The Charge in the Philippines(Lockett) to the Secretary of State", FRUS, 7(2), pp.1123~1125 (1949)
  14. Robert T.Oliver, "Syngman Rheeand American involvement in Korea, 1942~1960:a personal narrative", pp.23~ (1978), Panmun Book Company Ltd
  15. "동아일보 ,1949.5.17", ~ (1949)
  16. 邵毓麟, "使韓回憶錄", pp.365~ (1980), 傳記文學出版社
  17. "대통령이승만박사담화집", pp.144~ (1953), 공보처
  18. "동아일보 ,1949.8.6", ~ (1949)
  19. "경향신문", ~ (1949)
  20. "동아일보", ~ (1949)
  21. "Memorandum by the Policy Information Officer of the Office of Far Eastern Affairs (Fisher) to the Director of the Office(Butterworth)", FRUS, 7(2), pp.1162~ (1949)
  22. "The Ambassador in Korea(Muccio) to the Assistant Secretary of State for Far Eastern Affairs(Rusk)", FRUS, 7(2), pp.88~ (1950)
  23. "President Truman’s Message to the Congress of the United States", ~ (1950)
  24. "韓國戰爭與臺灣防衛", 外交部檔案 11-417, pp.88~
  25. "駐美大使顧維鈞이臺灣外交部에보낸電文", 143~ (1950)
  26. "Chicago領事館報告:韓國事件與美國對華政策", ~ (1950)
  27. "韓國戰爭與臺灣防衛", 外交部檔案 11-417, pp.333~334
  28. "外交問題座談會談話紀要", 68~69 (1950)
  29. "中華民國與日本國平和條約", ~ (1952)
  30. "中日和平條約", 外交部檔案 11-012.6, pp.14~
  31. "駐韓大使邵毓麟이 外交部에 보낸 電文", ~ (1951)
  32. "駐韓邵毓麟大使建議派員赴韓觀戰案", 外交部檔案 11-005.1, pp.6~7
  33. "駐美大使顧維鈞과 美國務次官對談報告", ~ (1951)
  34. "韓國戰爭與臺灣防衛", 外交部檔案 ..11-417, pp.306~
  35. "外交問題座談會談話紀要", ~ (1950)
  36. "韓國戰爭與臺灣防衛", 外交部檔案 11-417, pp.69~
  37. "Christian Science Monitor誌 記事", ~ (1953)
  38. "韓國李承晩大統領訪臺曁擬訂太平洋同盟", 外交部檔案 11-012.22, pp.118~
  39. "駐필리핀大使館에서外交部・次長에게보낸電文:駐필리핀美國大使館參事 William Sterling Byrd Lacy와 談話 備忘錄", 130~ (1953)
  40. "菲朝野對於中韓醞釀太平洋同盟之看法及反響", 外交部檔案, 109~ (1953)
  41. "駐韓大使王東原이外交部長・總統에게보낸電文", 122~ (1953)
  42. "駐韓大使館에서外交部에보낸協助電文", 156~ (1954)
  43. "新聞記事모음:不參加反共聯盟菲報贊揚麥格塞塞態度", 186~ (1954)
  44. "董顯光駐日大使赴韓談話紀要", ~ (1953)
  45. "韓國李承晩大統領訪臺曁擬訂太平洋同盟", 外交部檔案 11-012.22, pp.40~
  46. "동아일보", ~ (1954)
  47. "董顯光駐日大使赴韓談話紀要", 37~ (1953)
  48. "GeorgeK.C.Yeh’s(Taiwan Minister of Foreign Affairs) letter to United State VicePresidentRichardNixon", ~ (1953)
  49. "韓國李承晩大統領訪臺曁擬訂太平洋同盟", 外交部檔案 11-012.22, pp.176~
  50. "國際間對中美簽訂共同防禦條約之反應", ~ (1954)
  51. "美對華政策", 外交部檔案 11-411.2, pp.90~103

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)