廣東 13行과 개항의 기억
Thirteen Hongs of Canton’s and Memories of Port Opening
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Guangzhou was the only port where trades with the western world had been allowed for 80 years before the five ports were opened by the Sino-British Treaty in 1842. Guangzhou won its reputation as the window through which China understood the world and the world recognized China before the opening of the ports. At the center of it were 13 hongs of Canton’s. They were loyal enforcers to the Ching Dinasty for controlling foreign trade in the period of ‘Trade only through Guangzhou.’ As a licensed merchant group monopolizing the foreign trade with the western world, 13 hongs were also a governmental merchant group that was in charge not only of the collection of export-import customs but also of the management and control of foreigners and the public relations work with foreigners. The hong merchants, as a political product in the period of trade only trough Guangzhou, had difficulty evading the Ching Dinasty’s intervention, and was doomed to be closely related to the Ching Dinasty’s rise and fall from the day of its birth. The memories of port opening in Guangzhou are closely connected to the Opium War. While China was changed into the semi-colonial and semi-feudal society, Chinese people were engaged in the struggle against imperialism and feudalism. Sanyuanli People Hangyeong Memorial Hall in Sanyuanli and the Museum of the Opium War in Humen were representative places of the memories and commemoration space of the Opening of Guangzhou port. The corrupted Ching Dinasty, which enforced the policy of national seclusion with trade only via one port, was one of the causers of the Opium War like the Imperial Britain, and 13 hongs of Canton’s, the faithful enforcer of the policy, also were the root of evil, which have been long forgotten out of the memories of the opening of Guangzhou. Since China underwent a paradigm shift in that it recognized 13 hongs of Canton’s not as the sinners but as the victims in the Opium War, the research on 13 Hong’s has been activated. Furthermore, experts aggressively have proposed that the historical and cultural resources of 13 Hongs’ be preserved and developed that were excluded from the memories and commemorated space related to the opening of the ports. The preservation and development of 13 Hong’s as such were also closely related to the efforts to raise the historical status of Guangzhou as a vanguard city of reform and opening-up. Also, the historical and cultural resources of 13 Hong’s seem to play a crucial role in strengthening Guangzhou’s local identity to the effect that their comprehensiveness for the civilizations outside China, openness, pioneerism, and progressiveness toward the oceans and the world show the essential of Guang Dong merchants. 13 Hong’s, which have been forgotten out of the memory of the opening of Guangzhou, are resurrected in Guangzhou, the vanguard region of reform and opening-up, the root of early modern and modern revolutions, the starting point of the Marine Silk Road, and the center of the Lingnan culture. Though the old port of Huangpu was already developed and the 13 Hong’s History Material Gallery was constructed, the construction of the Historical Museum of 13 Hong’s in future will be the symbol of their resurrection in that such constructions well restore the ‘placeness’ of 13 Hong’s.
Abstract
Guangzhou was the only port where trades with the western world had been allowed for 80 years before the five ports were opened by the Sino-British Treaty in 1842. Guangzhou won its reputation as the window through which China understood the world and the world recognized China before the opening of the ports. At the center of it were 13 hongs of Canton’s. They were loyal enforcers to the Ching Dinasty for controlling foreign trade in the period of ‘Trade only through Guangzhou.’ As a licensed merchant group monopolizing the foreign trade with the western world, 13 hongs were also a governmental merchant group that was in charge not only of the collection of export-import customs but also of the management and control of foreigners and the public relations work with foreigners. The hong merchants, as a political product in the period of trade only trough Guangzhou, had difficulty evading the Ching Dinasty’s intervention, and was doomed to be closely related to the Ching Dinasty’s rise and fall from the day of its birth. The memories of port opening in Guangzhou are closely connected to the Opium War. While China was changed into the semi-colonial and semi-feudal society, Chinese people were engaged in the struggle against imperialism and feudalism. Sanyuanli People Hangyeong Memorial Hall in Sanyuanli and the Museum of the Opium War in Humen were representative places of the memories and commemoration space of the Opening of Guangzhou port. The corrupted Ching Dinasty, which enforced the policy of national seclusion with trade only via one port, was one of the causers of the Opium War like the Imperial Britain, and 13 hongs of Canton’s, the faithful enforcer of the policy, also were the root of evil, which have been long forgotten out of the memories of the opening of Guangzhou. Since China underwent a paradigm shift in that it recognized 13 hongs of Canton’s not as the sinners but as the victims in the Opium War, the research on 13 Hong’s has been activated. Furthermore, experts aggressively have proposed that the historical and cultural resources of 13 Hongs’ be preserved and developed that were excluded from the memories and commemorated space related to the opening of the ports. The preservation and development of 13 Hong’s as such were also closely related to the efforts to raise the historical status of Guangzhou as a vanguard city of reform and opening-up. Also, the historical and cultural resources of 13 Hong’s seem to play a crucial role in strengthening Guangzhou’s local identity to the effect that their comprehensiveness for the civilizations outside China, openness, pioneerism, and progressiveness toward the oceans and the world show the essential of Guang Dong merchants. 13 Hong’s, which have been forgotten out of the memory of the opening of Guangzhou, are resurrected in Guangzhou, the vanguard region of reform and opening-up, the root of early modern and modern revolutions, the starting point of the Marine Silk Road, and the center of the Lingnan culture. Though the old port of Huangpu was already developed and the 13 Hong’s History Material Gallery was constructed, the construction of the Historical Museum of 13 Hong’s in future will be the symbol of their resurrection in that such constructions well restore the ‘placeness’ of 13 Hong’s.
참고문헌 (50)
- 백승욱, "중국 노동자의 기억의 정치 -- 문화대혁명 시기의 기억을 중심으로" (2007), 폴리테이아
- 통창, "공자와 문화혁명 : 집단 기억에 관한 연구, In 국가와 기억" (2006), 오름
- 황동연, "포스트모더니티의 역사들" (2005), 창비
- 한지은, "탈식민주의 도시 상하이에서 장소기억의 경합", 문화역사지리, 20(2), pp.43~61 (2008), 한국문화역사지리학회
- 김승욱, "근대 상하이 도시 공간과 기억의 굴절", 중국근현대사연구, (41), pp.115~140 (2009), 중국근현대사학회
- 여문환, "동아시아 전쟁 기억의 국제정치" (2009), 한국학술정보
- 박경석, "동아시아의 전쟁기념관과 역사 갈등 - ‘中國人民抗日戰爭紀念館’을 중심으로 -", 중국근현대사연구, (41), pp.167~187 (2009), 중국근현대사학회
- 김형열, "난징대학살(南京大屠殺)과 기억의 정책 -학살에 대한 기억의 전승과 관리를 중심으로-", 대구사학, 106, pp.57~90 (2012), 대구사학회
- 이화준, "‘난징대학살’ 문제를 둘러싼 기억의 정치와 국제정치학적 딜레마", 일본연구, (15), pp.539~563 (2011), 일본연구센터
- 彭澤益, "初四榷關地點和貿易量的考察", 社會科學學報, (3) (1984)
- 박기수, "청대 광동의 대외무역과 광동상인", 명청사연구, 9 (1998)
- 周湘, "廣州外洋行商人", pp.4~8 (2002), 廣東人民出版社
- 梁嘉彬, "廣東十三行考" (2009), 廣東人民出版社
- 馬士, "中華帝國對外關係史 제1권", pp.74~75 (2000), 上海書店出版社
- "粵海關志 卷25", 行商
- 蕭國亮, "淸代廣州行商制度硏究", 淸史硏究, (1), pp.34~ (2007)
- 潘剛兒, "廣州十三行之一 : 潘同文(孚)行" (2006), 華南理工大學出版社
- 亨特, "廣州番鬼錄", pp.56~ (2009), 廣東人民出版社
- 李國榮, "제국의 상점", pp.113~115 (2008), 소나무
- 曾昭璇, "廣州十三行商館區的歷史地理, In 廣州十三行滄桑", pp.9~12 (2001), 廣東省地圖出版社
- 朱希祖, "廣東十三行考" (1999), 廣東人民出版社
- 胡文中, "十三行與鴉片戰爭, In 廣州十三行滄桑", 90~99
- 管亞東, "淸代前期廣州口岸中西貿易的行外商人, In 廣州十三行滄桑", 274~276
- 胡文中, "十三行與鴉片戰爭", 99~100
- 蔣祖緣, "淸代十三行吸納西方文化的成就與影響", 學術硏究, (5), pp.77~ (1998)
- 박기수, "葛藤․協力․隸屬 ― 清代 廣東對外貿易中의 行商과 東印度會社의 關係를 중심으로 ―", 명청사연구, (36), pp.251~282 (2011), 명청사학회
- 하오엔핑(郝延平), "중국의 상업혁명", pp.294~297 (2003), 소나무
- 林瀚, "淸代廣州十三行在中西交流中的歷史地位", 廣州大學學報(社會科學版), 5(8), pp.61~ (2006)
- 丁新豹, "晩淸中國外銷畵, In 廣州十三行滄桑", ~
- 何薇, "略論西關在廣州中西交流中的歷史地位", 廣州大學學報(社會科學版), 3(3), pp.21~ (2004)
- 蔣祖緣, "淸代十三行吸納西方文化的成就與影響", 77~
- 査時杰, "馬禮遜與廣州十三行夷館", pp.1~25 (2010), 廣西師範大學出版社
- 권귀숙, "기억의 정치" (2006), 문학과 지성사
- 전진성, "역사가 기억을 말하다" (2005), 휴머니스트
- 정근식, "기억의 문화, 기념물과 역사교육", 역사교육, (97), pp.277~305 (2006), 역사교육연구회
- 한성훈, "기념물을 둘러싼 기억의 정치와 집단 정체성- 거창사건의 위령비를 중심으로", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), (78), pp.35~64 (2008), 한국사회사학회
- 李銀子, "아편전쟁과 중국의 ‘문호개방’에 대한 역사교육과 역사인식", 중국근현대사연구, 19, pp.43~69 (2003), 중국근현대사학회
- 廣東省文物局, "廣東文化遺産-全國重点文物保護單位" (2010), 文物出版社
- "아편전쟁박물관 홈페이지"[URL]
- 楊宏烈, "廣州泛十三行商埠文化遺址開發硏究", pp.10~11 (2006), 華南理工大學出版社
- 楊萬秀, "廣州簡史" (1996), 廣東人民出版社
- 楊萬秀, "廣州通史(전6권)" (2010), 中華書局
- 冷東, "在中國走向世界的過程中考察廣州十三行的歷史地位", 廣州大學學報(社會科學版), 9(8) (2010)
- 龔纓晏, "哥德堡號-中瑞經濟文化交流的歷史見證, In 廣州十三行滄桑", ~
- 何龍寧, "“哥德堡號”沉船與廣州十三行硏究", 廣東史志, (3) (2002)
- "黃埔古港景觀區", 廣州日報, ~ (2006)
- "海山飄渺處歷史鲜活來"[URL]
- 陳敬堂, "籌建十三行歷史博物館芻議(代跋), In 廣州十三行滄桑", ~
- 程浩, "兩次阿片戰爭對廣州港的影響", 羊城今古, (5) (1990)
- 王雲泉, "廣州租界地區的來龍去脈, In 廣州的洋行與租界", 廣州文史資料, 44 (1992), 廣東人民出版社
