『전경』에 나타난 ‘미륵’의 성격
The Meaning of ‘Maitreya(彌勒)’ in 『Jeon-gyeong』
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this study is to explain characteristics of Maitreya and Maitreya belief from a point of view that ‘Jeungsan is the very Maitreya(甑山卽彌勒)’. In 『Jeon-gyeong』, Maitreya is mentioned several times. Thus, new religions of Jeungsan of Daesoonjinrihoe take ‘Jeungsan is the very Maitreya’ belief for truth. Due to the fact that characteristics of Maitreya are so multi-layered and complicated, it is necessary to explain clearly what kind of feature Maitreya has in 『Jeon-gyeong』. If believing and following ‘Jeungsan is the very Maitreya’ without clarifying it, they will be faced with a problem that they regard Jeungsan of Supreme being of the Ninth Heaven as one of Maitreya and take its belief for truth. Furthermore, with respect to the characteristics of ‘Jeungsan is the very Maitreya’ belief, while believing in Mireukasaeng, longed-for Millenarian movement by people through Messianism and Mireukasaeng belief is found in Daesoon Thought, whereas there is a need how to understand the point that we cannot finped Messianism and Millenarian movement in Daesoon Thought. To solve this problem, I draw a conclusion that ‘Jeungsan is the very Maitreya’ in 『Jeon-gyeong』 has to be understood with two meanings by four demonstrations. First of all, the people perceived late Joseon dynasty as the age of decadence but Maitreya’s divinity which is desired by the people is not divinity of Maitreya Sutra(Mileuggyeong). Maitreya’s divinity is reflected in the people’s cherished desire and it is newly created as the Messiah. Thus, the idea of Jeungsan being the very Maitreya was developed in a way that the people desired the Messiah, encompassing this inclination. That is the Messiah of the people and the divinity of Jeungsan. Although Jeungsan as Supreme being of the Ninth Heaven satisfied the people’s desire, it shows a different way to salvation from the way in Maitreya Sutra(Mileuggyeong). It is ‘the Great Reordering of the Universe’ and ‘the Great Reordering of the Three Realms’. Reordering in Jeungsan shows that divinity of Jeungsan is not limited to the people’s Messiah. In other words, divinity of Jeungsan is established as The Messiah, surpassing divinity of Maitreya Sutra(Mileuggyeong). And following statements prove this divinity of Jeungsan. Jeungsan’s emphasis is not only the people’s desire and the Gods’ appeal. Jeungsan’s emphasis is that only does Supreme being of the Ninth Heaven correct heaven and earth, which is the Gods’ appeal. Therefore, ‘Jeungsan is the very Maitreya’ belief embraces the people’s Messianism and at the same time it runs with he Gods’ appeal. Thus, Reordering through the Great Reordering of the Universe and the Great Reordering of the Three Realms builds up a new ideal world.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to explain characteristics of Maitreya and Maitreya belief from a point of view that ‘Jeungsan is the very Maitreya(甑山卽彌勒)’. In 『Jeon-gyeong』, Maitreya is mentioned several times. Thus, new religions of Jeungsan of Daesoonjinrihoe take ‘Jeungsan is the very Maitreya’ belief for truth. Due to the fact that characteristics of Maitreya are so multi-layered and complicated, it is necessary to explain clearly what kind of feature Maitreya has in 『Jeon-gyeong』. If believing and following ‘Jeungsan is the very Maitreya’ without clarifying it, they will be faced with a problem that they regard Jeungsan of Supreme being of the Ninth Heaven as one of Maitreya and take its belief for truth. Furthermore, with respect to the characteristics of ‘Jeungsan is the very Maitreya’ belief, while believing in Mireukasaeng, longed-for Millenarian movement by people through Messianism and Mireukasaeng belief is found in Daesoon Thought, whereas there is a need how to understand the point that we cannot finped Messianism and Millenarian movement in Daesoon Thought. To solve this problem, I draw a conclusion that ‘Jeungsan is the very Maitreya’ in 『Jeon-gyeong』 has to be understood with two meanings by four demonstrations. First of all, the people perceived late Joseon dynasty as the age of decadence but Maitreya’s divinity which is desired by the people is not divinity of Maitreya Sutra(Mileuggyeong). Maitreya’s divinity is reflected in the people’s cherished desire and it is newly created as the Messiah. Thus, the idea of Jeungsan being the very Maitreya was developed in a way that the people desired the Messiah, encompassing this inclination. That is the Messiah of the people and the divinity of Jeungsan. Although Jeungsan as Supreme being of the Ninth Heaven satisfied the people’s desire, it shows a different way to salvation from the way in Maitreya Sutra(Mileuggyeong). It is ‘the Great Reordering of the Universe’ and ‘the Great Reordering of the Three Realms’. Reordering in Jeungsan shows that divinity of Jeungsan is not limited to the people’s Messiah. In other words, divinity of Jeungsan is established as The Messiah, surpassing divinity of Maitreya Sutra(Mileuggyeong). And following statements prove this divinity of Jeungsan. Jeungsan’s emphasis is not only the people’s desire and the Gods’ appeal. Jeungsan’s emphasis is that only does Supreme being of the Ninth Heaven correct heaven and earth, which is the Gods’ appeal. Therefore, ‘Jeungsan is the very Maitreya’ belief embraces the people’s Messianism and at the same time it runs with he Gods’ appeal. Thus, Reordering through the Great Reordering of the Universe and the Great Reordering of the Three Realms builds up a new ideal world.
참고문헌 (22)
- 대순진리회 교무부, "전경" (2010), 대순진리회 출판부
- 대순진리회 교무부, "대순지침" (1984), 대순진리회 출판부
- 甄鸞, "笑道論", 廣弘明集 권제9에 수록되어 있음, ~
- "삼국지, 권1", ~
- 고성훈, "민란의 시대" (2000), 가람기획
- 고은, "오늘의 미륵-그 현재성을 위한 감상" (1990), 법주사
- 宮田登, "彌勒信仰と民衆思想" (1990), 법주사
- 김삼룡, "조선시대의 미륵신앙" (1987), 동국대학교 출판부
- 김태영, "삼국시대의 미륵신앙" (1987), 동국대학교 출판부
- 나우권, "불교의 도교 비판과 도교의 응답 - 『소도론(笑道論)』과 『노자의소 (老子義疏)』에 나타난 老子觀을 중심으로 -", 도교문화연구, 42, pp.171~215 (2015), 한국도교문화학회
- 다니가와 미치오, "중국민중반란사" (1996), 혜안
- 모종감, "중국도교사" (2015), 예문출판사
- 박광연, "동아시아의 ‘王卽佛’ 전통과 미륵불 궁예", 사학연구, (110), pp.87~122 (2013), 한국사학회
- 石上善應, "彌勒思想の根源的接近, 미륵사상의 현대적 조명" (1990), 법주사
- 蕭登福, "讖緯與道敎" (2000), 文津出版社
- 손진태, "조선신가유편" (2012), 도서출판 박이정
- 유병덕, "한국미륵사상연구" (1987), 동국대학교 출판부
- 윤찬원, "태평경 역주" (2012), 세창출판사
- 정재서, "증산사상의 다층적 이해" (2015), 청홍
- 차남희, "천년왕국신앙과 전통사회의 정치변동 : 미륵하생신앙을 중심으로", 동양정치사상사, 3(2) (2004)
- 황준연, "유∙불∙도 철학의 관점에서 바라본 대순사상의 의의", 대순사상논총, 20, pp.67~93 (2009), 대순사상학술원
- Anna Seidel, "Taoist Messianism", Numen, 31(2), pp.161~ (1984), JSTOR[DOI]
