본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국불교에서 본 대순사상 - 미륵사상과 삼교회통(조화)사상을 중심으로 -

A Study on Daesoon Thought from Korean Buddhist Viewpoint: With Emphasis on Maitreya Thought and the Interpenetration(Unity) of the Three Teachings

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

초록

Abstract

In this paper, I will study the common point between Korean buddhist thought and Daesoon thought. In 2 chapter, I will illuminate Kang Jeungsan to be familiar with buddhist culture. Daewonsa(大院寺) was the place Kang Jeungsan's to enlighten Path. Kang Jeungsan said Śākyamuni to the people to follow himself. And Kang Jeungsan burned Thousand-Hands Sutra(千手經) as one of Chenjigongsa(天地公事). In 3 chapter I study the unfolding of Korean Maitreya thought and the interpenetration of the three teachings. In 4 chapter I study the idea of Maitreya Buddha and the unity of the three teachings in Daesoon thought. Maitreya has the origin in India. Korea accepted this Maitreya via China. In Silla era, the people accepted Maitreya in relation to Hwarang(花郞). In Unified Silla era, Beopsang jong(法相宗) accepted Maitreya devotion positively and the typical person is Jinpyo(眞表). In Goryeo era, Beopsang jong devoted Maitreya, on the other hand Maitreya devotion changed the popular devotion. In Joseon era, Maitreya devotion changed the popular devotion more and more. In this background, Kang Jeungsan accepted the idea of Maitreya Buddha. And Kang Jeungsan insisted that he is the existence to give Heaven’s decree to Choe Jeu(崔濟愚) of Donghak and to combine Jesus of Christianity. The interpenetration of the three teachings is one of the stream of Joseon era’s buddhim. We can read this in Hamheo Deuktong(涵虛得通)’s Hyeonjeongron(顯正論) and Yuseokjiluiron (儒釋質疑論) to pretend Hamheo Deuktong and Cheongheo Hyujeong(淸虛休靜)’s Samgagwigam(三家龜鑑). This interpenetration of the three teachings of Joseon era influenced Daesoon thought. The unity of the three teachings in Daesoon thought is divided into three. The first is the unity of the three teachings of Gwanwang(冠旺)’s standpoint, the second is the unity of the three teachings of Sungyo(仙敎) superior standpoint, the third is the unity of the three teachings of Jinmuk(震黙)’s anecdote. The interpenetration of the three teachings of Joseon era is connected with the unity of the three teachings of Jinmuk’s anecdote. Thus Joseon era’s buddhist thought and Daesoon thought have the common point in the idea of Maitreya Buddha and the interpenetration(unity) of the three teachings.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. "전경" (2010), 대순진리회 출판부
  2. "삼국사기", ~
  3. "한국불교전서 6권"
  4. "한국불교전서 7권"
  5. "한국불교전서 7권"
  6. 김남희, "증산교의 미륵신앙 수용과 전개과정", 한국불교학, (61), pp.75~104 (2011), 한국불교학회
  7. 김삼룡, "한국미륵신앙의 연구" (1983), 동화출판공사
  8. 김영호, "깨달음의 보편성과 특수성-불교와 증산의 경우", 한국종교사연구, 10 (2002)
  9. 김 탁, "한국종교사에서의 불교와 증산교의 만남", 동양고전연구, 3 (1994)
  10. 김홍철, "증산교사상사" (1998), 연세대출판부
  11. 박인규, "한국 불교 진언과 대순진리회 주문의 비교 연구", 대순사상논총, 22, pp.387~432 (2014), 대순사상학술원[DOI]
  12. 불교문화연구원, "한국미륵신앙연구" (1987), 동국대출판부
  13. 尹起鳳, "불교 權化思想의 한국적 전개와 大巡思想 연구", 박사, 인도철학, pp.1995
  14. 윤재근, "증산사상의 불교 수용과 해석", 신종교연구, 23(23), pp.169~192 (2010), 한국신종교학회[DOI]
  15. 윤재근, "증산의 유교 비판과 수용", 종교교육학연구, 35, pp.81~100 (2011), 한국종교교육학회
  16. 은정희, "서산 휴정의 삼가귀감 정신", 동양철학, 3 (1992)
  17. 이경원, "한국 신종교와 대순사상" (2011), 문사철
  18. 이경원, "대순진리회 신앙론" (2012), 문사철
  19. 이덕진, "불교철학과 대순사상의 사유체계에 대한 일고찰 - 우주관∙인간관∙이상사회관을 중심으로 -", 대순사상논총, 20, pp.223~272 (2009), 대순사상학술원
  20. 장지훈, "한국고대미륵신앙연구" (1997), 집문당
  21. 정석종, "한우근박사정년기념사학논총" (1981), 지식산업사
  22. 한종만, "조선조의 철학사상과 시대정신", 동양철학, 2 (1991)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)