본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

4・19민주항쟁 직후 한국 지식인들의 민주주의 인식 - 자유민주주의와 민주적 사회주의를 중심으로

Korean Intellectuals’ Perspective on Democracy after 4・19 Democratic Movement - Focused on Liberal Democracy and Democratic Socialism

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper is aimed at analyzing Korean intellectuals how to appropriate the discourse of democracy after democratic struggle at 19 April 1960 in Korea. Liberal democrats were inspired by people’s democratic struggle at 19 April 1960, so they called it ‘civil revolution’. Korean intellectuals had some inferiority complex which ‘underdeveloped’ Korea had not experienced civil revolution ‘developed’ western countries had undergone. Liberal democrats insisted on establishment of representative democracy system for the completion democratic struggle at 19 April 1960 into the revolution. While they criticized people’s democratic movement beyond representative democracy system after April struggle. Their broadside on students’ and laborers’ struggle implied liberal democrat’s fear on people’s democratic movement. Liberal democrat, Ham seok heon was an distinctive figure as he criticized capitalist modernization theory and tried to regard the people(Min Joong) as political subject. He insisted that the revolution should be overturn of people’s mind. In this respect April democratic struggle was failed revolution for him. Through the reflection on April democratic struggle, he urged the people to practice nonviolence revolution beyond the violence of material civilization. Democratic socialists insisted on the abolishment of capitalism. They thought that the principle of free market could hinder the dignity of human and civil liberty. They criticized liberal democrat who considered the democracy represented at April democratic struggle as only ‘liberal democracy’. They named 4・19 ‘democratic revolution’ for democratic socialism. They insisted on the establishment of democratic socialism economy system with industrial nationalization. They didn’t deny self-supporting economy based on the industrialization while they argued the abolition of capitalism.

Abstract

This paper is aimed at analyzing Korean intellectuals how to appropriate the discourse of democracy after democratic struggle at 19 April 1960 in Korea. Liberal democrats were inspired by people’s democratic struggle at 19 April 1960, so they called it ‘civil revolution’. Korean intellectuals had some inferiority complex which ‘underdeveloped’ Korea had not experienced civil revolution ‘developed’ western countries had undergone. Liberal democrats insisted on establishment of representative democracy system for the completion democratic struggle at 19 April 1960 into the revolution. While they criticized people’s democratic movement beyond representative democracy system after April struggle. Their broadside on students’ and laborers’ struggle implied liberal democrat’s fear on people’s democratic movement. Liberal democrat, Ham seok heon was an distinctive figure as he criticized capitalist modernization theory and tried to regard the people(Min Joong) as political subject. He insisted that the revolution should be overturn of people’s mind. In this respect April democratic struggle was failed revolution for him. Through the reflection on April democratic struggle, he urged the people to practice nonviolence revolution beyond the violence of material civilization. Democratic socialists insisted on the abolishment of capitalism. They thought that the principle of free market could hinder the dignity of human and civil liberty. They criticized liberal democrat who considered the democracy represented at April democratic struggle as only ‘liberal democracy’. They named 4・19 ‘democratic revolution’ for democratic socialism. They insisted on the establishment of democratic socialism economy system with industrial nationalization. They didn’t deny self-supporting economy based on the industrialization while they argued the abolition of capitalism.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 張俊河, "民權戰線의 勇士들이여 편히 쉬시라", 사상계, (82), pp.19~ (1960)
  2. 장준하, "또다시 우리의 向方을 천명하면서", 사상계, (83), pp.36~ (1960)
  3. 金成植, "학생과 자유민권운동", 사상계, (83), pp.66~ (1960)
  4. 夫琓爀, "혁명의 現段階와 今後", 사상계, (83), pp.129~ (1960)
  5. 申相楚, "李承晩暴政의 終焉", 사상계, (83), pp.82~ (1960)
  6. 安秉煜, "利의 世代와 義의 世代", 사상계, (83), pp.100~101 (1960)
  7. 장준하, "革命尙未成功", 사상계, (85), pp.35~ (1960)
  8. 부완혁, "혁명의 현단계와 금후", 사상계, (83), pp.137~138 (1960)
  9. 韓泰淵, "제2공화국헌법의 경향", 사상계, (83), pp.166~168 (1960)
  10. 李相殷, "학생과 선거계몽", 사상계, (85), pp.92~ (1960)
  11. 咸錫憲, "한 나라의 갈 길. in: 한국혁명의 방향", pp.87~ (1961), 중앙공론사
  12. 함석헌, "인간혁명" (1961), 일우사
  13. 정태영, "한국사회민주주의 정당의 역사적 기원", pp.287~290 (2007), 후마니타스
  14. "민족일보", ~
  15. 홍영유, "4월의거의 혁명사적 의의", 고대문화, (2), pp.87~ (1960)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)