본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

4·18 고대행동의 정치사회적 조건과 미시적 요인 -능동적 관계의 망을 통한 저항의 의미 틀의 형성・확산을 중심으로

Socio-Political Terms and Micro-Factors As To “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” Waged by Students at Korea University - Focused on Broad Struggle Frameworks and Active Networks

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This research paper analyzed the terms and causes of “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” in 1960, when college students waged for the first time in Seoul cities, just before a day when “April 19th Revolution” took place. As it is hard to explain about movements and processes of the massive non-violent direct actions only in macro- and structural aspects, this paper attempted to analyze the non-violent direct actions from two macro and micro-perspectives in link with political process. Such approach methods were made due to influences of established organizations, informal links, sub-cultural identities on solidarity, cooperation and ideological hegemonism. Thus, complex and multi-perspective approach methods are useful in not only changing awareness, actions and motives but also identifying characteristics and patterns of “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” in visual lights. This research paper attempted to review and reconceptualize the name and traits of April Revolution and April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions, before analyzing terms and causes of April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions. Assuming that the name of “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” has something to do with the name of traits that the event had, “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” can be referred to as assuming a less important significance and complying with no true spirit that “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” had. This paper started to study the root of the history and correlation networks of Non-Violent Direct Actions waged by students at Korea University. At the same time, this attempted to establish concepts, taking into reflection of dualistic meaning of “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” in receipt of exterior motives and supports and, taking consideration of status and roles that “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” played in the Korean Democratic Movement History. “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” caused by students at Korean University was redefined under the awareness that such actions are cultural phenomena hard to explain merely in objective/ structural/ financial and institutional terms. In addition to this, this paper accounted for the significance of organizational strategies that “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” or ‘student actions’ had. Against background of “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” caused by Students in Korea University, this paper traced own not only socio-political terms including opportunity structure terms but also interactions between significant frameworks of non-violent direct actions and collective identity and active relation links, which had something to do with April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions . Grounded on these, this paper provided a clue to a question, <“What made ‘April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” take place? Why did the actions took place in Korea University?”>As for such actions caused by students at Korea University, this paper studied classifying into the following three temporal phases:‘Spring in 1960’. / ‘Spring in 1960 and 1961’/ ‘Overall Trend of Severance and Permanence of Democratic Movement’. This paper illuminated “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” and ‘April Revolution’ and analyzed periods and tasks of such April revolution amid a series of historical trends, in order to micro-define democracy and overcome coercively forgotten symbolic orders, and shed light on the historical meanings and spirits of the non-violent direction actions. This research paper is to consider “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” waged by students at Korea University as not just the epoch-making event, which led a change in the frameworks of the Korean Democratic Movement, but also, as the historical event, which opened a way to get over limited boundaries and establish greater correlation frameworks. It goes without saying that this paper established broader correlation frameworks apart from regional class, issue and boundaries between the two Koreas. Research on spirit of “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” in South Korea was made within broader frameworks, without exception. One was to expand correlation frameworks apart from democratic frameworks and systems limited to representative democracy. Another was to promote memory and communication frameworks, in face of coercibly forgotten symbolic orders.

Abstract

This research paper analyzed the terms and causes of “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” in 1960, when college students waged for the first time in Seoul cities, just before a day when “April 19th Revolution” took place. As it is hard to explain about movements and processes of the massive non-violent direct actions only in macro- and structural aspects, this paper attempted to analyze the non-violent direct actions from two macro and micro-perspectives in link with political process. Such approach methods were made due to influences of established organizations, informal links, sub-cultural identities on solidarity, cooperation and ideological hegemonism. Thus, complex and multi-perspective approach methods are useful in not only changing awareness, actions and motives but also identifying characteristics and patterns of “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” in visual lights. This research paper attempted to review and reconceptualize the name and traits of April Revolution and April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions, before analyzing terms and causes of April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions. Assuming that the name of “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” has something to do with the name of traits that the event had, “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” can be referred to as assuming a less important significance and complying with no true spirit that “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” had. This paper started to study the root of the history and correlation networks of Non-Violent Direct Actions waged by students at Korea University. At the same time, this attempted to establish concepts, taking into reflection of dualistic meaning of “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” in receipt of exterior motives and supports and, taking consideration of status and roles that “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” played in the Korean Democratic Movement History. “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” caused by students at Korean University was redefined under the awareness that such actions are cultural phenomena hard to explain merely in objective/ structural/ financial and institutional terms. In addition to this, this paper accounted for the significance of organizational strategies that “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” or ‘student actions’ had. Against background of “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” caused by Students in Korea University, this paper traced own not only socio-political terms including opportunity structure terms but also interactions between significant frameworks of non-violent direct actions and collective identity and active relation links, which had something to do with April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions . Grounded on these, this paper provided a clue to a question, <“What made ‘April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” take place? Why did the actions took place in Korea University?”>As for such actions caused by students at Korea University, this paper studied classifying into the following three temporal phases:‘Spring in 1960’. / ‘Spring in 1960 and 1961’/ ‘Overall Trend of Severance and Permanence of Democratic Movement’. This paper illuminated “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” and ‘April Revolution’ and analyzed periods and tasks of such April revolution amid a series of historical trends, in order to micro-define democracy and overcome coercively forgotten symbolic orders, and shed light on the historical meanings and spirits of the non-violent direction actions. This research paper is to consider “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” waged by students at Korea University as not just the epoch-making event, which led a change in the frameworks of the Korean Democratic Movement, but also, as the historical event, which opened a way to get over limited boundaries and establish greater correlation frameworks. It goes without saying that this paper established broader correlation frameworks apart from regional class, issue and boundaries between the two Koreas. Research on spirit of “April 18th Non-Violent Direct Actions” in South Korea was made within broader frameworks, without exception. One was to expand correlation frameworks apart from democratic frameworks and systems limited to representative democracy. Another was to promote memory and communication frameworks, in face of coercibly forgotten symbolic orders.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. 4・19혁명과 기독교. in: 한국개신교가 한국근현대사의 사회. 문화적 변동에 끼친 영향 연구, "김재성", 한국신학연구소, 125~ (2005)
  2. 정창현, "민주와 통일 운동의 결합 : 끝나지 않은 미완의 혁명 4・19" (2002), 내일을 여는 역사
  3. 사월혁명의 순환구조와 6・3항쟁- 역사주기론의 시각. in: 사월혁명과 한국의 민주주의, "조대엽", 민주화운동기념사업회, 133~ (2010)
  4. 김동춘, "4월 혁명에 관한 기존 연구와 그 문제점. in: 한국사회변혁운동과 4월 혁명", pp.329~ (1990), 한길사
  5. 정성기, "80년대 한국사회구성체논쟁, 또 하나의 성찰적 재론", 역사비평, (71), pp.34~66 (2005), 역사문제연구소
  6. 엘빈 굴드너, "지성인의 미래와 새 계급의 성장", pp.21~ (1994), 이화여대 출판부
  7. 강수택, "다시 지식인을 묻는다", pp.50~51 (2001), 삼인
  8. 금인숙, "마르크스주의 사회과학에서의 오리엔탈리즘- 1980년대 사회구성체논쟁 중심으로 -", 담론201, 9(3), pp.109~157 (2006), 한국사회역사학회
  9. 황건, "사월혁명의 현재적 의의", 개혁시대 (2006), 한국사회발전시민실천협의
  10. 김태일, "2・28 민주운동의 역사적 의의. in: 2・28 민주의거 운동사 1", pp.146~ (2000), 2・28 민주의거 40주년 특별기념사업회
  11. 이수인, "자유당 정권의 역사적 성격. in: 한국사회변혁운동과 사월혁명" (1990), 한길사
  12. 정용욱, "이승만 정부의 붕괴(3・15-4.26): 이승만정부의 대응 및 미국의 역할과 관련하여. in: 한국현대사의 재인식 4", pp.230~233 (2004), 오름
  13. 강순원, "분단사회의 종속적 교육발전. in: 한국사회변혁운동과 사월혁명", pp.61~62 (1990), 한길사
  14. 오천석, "한국신교육사", pp.511~ (1964), 현대교육총서출판사
  15. 윤순갑, "2・28 민주운동의 배경. in: 󰡔2・28 민주의거 운동사. 사료편", pp.65~ (2000), 12・28 민주의거 40주년 특별기념사업회
  16. 사월혁명연구소, "좌담: 사월혁명의 현재적 의의. in: 한국사회변혁운동과 사월혁명", pp.405~ (1990), 한길사
  17. 홍영유, "혁명과 반동의 소용돌이 속에서-어떤 4월의 기억들", 경기사학, 10, pp.155~156 (2007), 경기사학회
  18. 최장집, "민주화 이후의 민주주의", pp.65~ (2003), 후마니타스
  19. 정기영, "사월혁명의 주도세력. in: 한국사회변혁운동과 사월혁명", pp.124~ (1990), 한길사
  20. 박찬세, "나의 고대신문시절. in: 고대신문축쇄판 2", pp.6~ (1985), 고대신문사
  21. 서중석, "한국현대사60년", pp.62~ (2007), 역사비평사
  22. 심재택, "4・19혁명의 전개과정. in: 동국대학교 4・19혁명사" (2004), 동국대학교 4・19혁명동지회
  23. 에릭 홉스봄, "만들어진 전통", pp.22~26 (2004), 휴머니스트
  24. 임대식, "1960년대 초반 지식인들의 현실인식", 역사비평, (65), pp.301~336 (2003), 역사문제연구소
  25. 박영신, "사회운동이후의 사회운동-4・19의 구성", 현상과 인식, 통권 : 82, pp.193~ (2000), 한국인문사회과학회
  26. 고성국, "사월혁명의 이념. in: 고려대학교와 4・18", pp.71~ (2001), 고려대학교출판부
  27. 이재오, "해방 후 한국학생운동사", pp.169~ (1987), 형성사
  28. 키스 젠킨스, "누구를 위한 역사인가" (1999), 혜안

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)