만주제국인가 청 제국인가 - 최근 미국의 청대사 연구동향을 중심으로 -
The Manchu Empire or The Qing Empire? - A Critical Review on ‘New Qing History’ -
2
조회
0
다운로드
17
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines recent English publications regarding Qing history, especially focusing on the works of Mark Elliott and Pamela Crossley, the two leading scholars in the field. “New Qing History” – a name for recent scholarship on Qing history, which has shared common interests in Manchu language materials and Inner Asian tradition in the Qing empire – has been widely discussed and read in Korea. This group of scholars has challenged the theory of sinicization, and instead highlighted important roles of non-Han people who have long been considered as “inferior barbarians,” especially the Manchus and Mongols, in Chinese history. There are also some disagreements found among these scholars, most notably regarding the question of how to understand ethnicity in the Qing history. Mark Elliott argues that Manchu ethnic identity had played a decisive role in the formation of the Qing state, and the distinctive cultural traits of the Manchu people – or the Manchuness in his word – had remained throughout the dynasty. Pamela Crossley refutes Elliott’s idea that many elements of the Manchuness, such as frugality and martial skills, were in fact products of the Qing imperial ideology. She addresses that the Manchu identity were constantly transformed by the Qing court’s interests. If Elliott explains the Qing history as the Manchu empire, Crossley offers the Qing empire, which included not only the Manchus but other imperial constituencies, such as the Mongol, Tibetan, and Uyghur. Understandings of these divergences in “New Qing History” help examine the ways in which the Qing made its relationships with neighboring countries. As long as the Qing had been transformed itself, its foreign policies changed as well. If the Qing court modified the history of the Manchus and the Mongols, so did to the Choson. As such, various questions raised in “New Qing History” can shed new light on the understanding of the Qing and Choson relationship.
Abstract
This paper examines recent English publications regarding Qing history, especially focusing on the works of Mark Elliott and Pamela Crossley, the two leading scholars in the field. “New Qing History” – a name for recent scholarship on Qing history, which has shared common interests in Manchu language materials and Inner Asian tradition in the Qing empire – has been widely discussed and read in Korea. This group of scholars has challenged the theory of sinicization, and instead highlighted important roles of non-Han people who have long been considered as “inferior barbarians,” especially the Manchus and Mongols, in Chinese history. There are also some disagreements found among these scholars, most notably regarding the question of how to understand ethnicity in the Qing history. Mark Elliott argues that Manchu ethnic identity had played a decisive role in the formation of the Qing state, and the distinctive cultural traits of the Manchu people – or the Manchuness in his word – had remained throughout the dynasty. Pamela Crossley refutes Elliott’s idea that many elements of the Manchuness, such as frugality and martial skills, were in fact products of the Qing imperial ideology. She addresses that the Manchu identity were constantly transformed by the Qing court’s interests. If Elliott explains the Qing history as the Manchu empire, Crossley offers the Qing empire, which included not only the Manchus but other imperial constituencies, such as the Mongol, Tibetan, and Uyghur. Understandings of these divergences in “New Qing History” help examine the ways in which the Qing made its relationships with neighboring countries. As long as the Qing had been transformed itself, its foreign policies changed as well. If the Qing court modified the history of the Manchus and the Mongols, so did to the Choson. As such, various questions raised in “New Qing History” can shed new light on the understanding of the Qing and Choson relationship.
참고문헌 (33)
- 김선민, "청제국의 변경통치에 관한 연구동향 분석, in 외국학계의 정복왕조 연구 시각과 최근 동향" (2010), 동북아역사재단
- 마크 엘리엇, "중심으로서의 주변: 만주학의 미래를 위한 서언" (2010), 고려대학교 민족문화연구원 초청강연
- 杉山淸彦, "大淸帝國史硏究の現在-日本における槪況と展望", 東洋文化硏究, 10 (2008)
- 杉山淸彦, "大淸帝國の支配構造 - マンジュ(滿洲)王朝として, in 淸朝とは何か", pp.136~137 (2009), 藤原書店
- 김선민, "만주족의 청제국", pp.38~503 (2009), 푸른역사
- 柳澤, "コメント", 東洋文化硏究, 10, pp.374~
- 윤영인, "만주족의 정체성과 청대사 연구", 만주연구, 5, pp.11~20 (2006)
- 구범진, "최후의 황제들: 청 황실의 사회사" (2010), 까치
- 홍성구, "대청제국 1616~1799", pp.76~103 (2009), 휴머니스트
- 林士鉉, "淸代蒙古與滿洲政治文化", pp.76~79 (2009), 國立政治大學歷史學系
- 파멜라 크로슬리, "‘신’청사에 대한 조심스러운 접근, in 외국학계의 정복왕조 연구 시각과 최근 동향" (2010), 동북아역사재단
- Elliott, "Qianlong Emperor: Son of Heaven, Man of the World" (2009), Longman
- Evelyn S. Rawski, "The last emperors: A social history of Qing imperial institutions" (1998), University of California Press
- Frederic Wakeman, "The Great Enterprise: The Manchu Reconstruction of Imperial Order in Seventeenth-Century China" (1985), University of California Press
- Gertraude Roth Li, "State Building Before 1644. In The Cambridge History of China Vol. 9, Part 1, The Ch’ing Empire to 1800" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Joanna Waley-Cohen, "The New Qing History", Radical History Review (2004)
- Mark C. Elliott, "and Frontier in Early Modern China. In Ethnicity in the Qing Eight Banners", pp.27~57 (2006), University of California Press
- Mark C. Elliott, "The Limits of Tartary: Manchuria in Imperial and National Geographies", The Journal of Asian Studies, 59(3) (2000)
- Mark C. Elliott, "The Manchu Way: The Eight Banners and Ethnic Identity in Late Imperial China" (2001), Stanford University Press
- Nicola Di Cosmo, "Military Aspects of the Manchu Wars against the Ĉaqars. In Warfare in Inner Asian History" (2002)
- Pamela K. Crossley, "The Influence of Altaicism on East Asian Studies", Proceedings for 2009 Berkeley-KU Forum on East Asian Cultural Studies: Towards a New Paradigm in East Asian Cultural Studies (2009)
- Pamela K. Crossley, "Introduction,” Empire at the Margins: Culture, Ethnicity, and Frontier in Early Modern China", pp.14~ (2006), University of California Press
- Pamela K. Crossley, "Translucent Mirror: History and Identity in Qing Imperial Ideology" (1999), University of California Press
- Pamela Kyle Crossley, "Making Mongols. In Empire at the Margins: Culture, Ethnicity, and Frontier in Early Modern China", pp.64~73 (2006), University of California Press
- Pamela Kyle Crossley, "The Conquest Elite of the Ch’ing Empire. In The Cambridge History of China", pp.311~359 (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Pamela Kyle Crossley, "A Translucent Mirror: History and Identity in Qing Imperial Ideology", pp.3~246 (1999), University of California Press
- Pamela Kyle Crossley, "Orphan Warriors: Three Manchu Generations and the End of the Qing World" (1990), Princeton University Press
- Pamela Kyle Crossley, "The Manchus", pp.6~10 (2002), Blackwell
- Peter C. Perdue, "China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia" (2005), Harvard University Press
- Ruth W. Dunnell, "Introduction. In New Qing Imperial History", pp.1~14 (2004), Routledge
- State, Peasant, "Merchant in Qing Manchuria, 1644~1862", pp.57~58 (2007), Stanford University Press
- Sugiyama Kiyohiko, "The Ch’ing Empire as a Manchu Khanate: The Structure of Rule under the Eight Banners", Acta Asiatica, 88, pp.21~48 (2005)
- マーク エィオット(Mark C. Elliott), "ヨロッパ、米國における滿洲學：過去･現在･未來", 東洋文化硏究, 10, pp.309~325 (2008)