본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

대순사상에 나타난 인간 주체(主體)에 관한 연구 - 인존(人尊) 개념을 중심으로 -

The Research Concerning of Human Subject in Daesoon Thought: on ‘In-Jon’ Idea

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

‘In-Jon(人尊)’ is one of a concept which constitute the mainstay of Daesoon thought. To be superficial, the concept is appeared to be limited at a area of anthropology, but In-Jon is a large concept which includes ontology and epistemology. Because the essence of human being is connected with God and the such possibility is related to the mission of human being’s subject who exists in world. Advanced researches to analysis of in-jon tend to focus on rise of human status but this study do on universal subject not particular subject. This is to elaborate the point of issue. The point of view as rise of human status overlooks problem of relationship between human entities. who ingenerate hierarchy. In-jon is the universal subject of philosophical subject concepts which western philosophy have taken as main problem since Descartes. So we have to consider In-jon to be conceptual continuity concerning stream of history of ideas and communicate with ideas. A precedent study on ‘injon’ concept has weak conceptual analysis, which only emphasizes the greatness of mankind as compared with others. But that can’t reveal In-jon based on the Daesoon thought. So I try to engraft the concept on development of subject ideas to get academic objectivity. In-jon is great in having universal subject to expand the authority of God to all creation. That is the last goal which subject can reaches through the development. Considering this regard the research direction of this study is very encouraging and significant. Western philosophy has important philosopher of the three, Descartes, Kant, Hegel. Those are a spectrum who show an aspect of subject ideas. The subject idea has become the middle of philosophical system since Descartes in modern. It is the right and necessary process to philosophy because human being has spirit or reason connected with God. So In-jon in Daesoon thought is academic concept comprising ontological and epistemological properties. So I try to analyse In-jon through that and have In-jon join the ranks of mainstream academics in this paper.

Abstract

‘In-Jon(人尊)’ is one of a concept which constitute the mainstay of Daesoon thought. To be superficial, the concept is appeared to be limited at a area of anthropology, but In-Jon is a large concept which includes ontology and epistemology. Because the essence of human being is connected with God and the such possibility is related to the mission of human being’s subject who exists in world. Advanced researches to analysis of in-jon tend to focus on rise of human status but this study do on universal subject not particular subject. This is to elaborate the point of issue. The point of view as rise of human status overlooks problem of relationship between human entities. who ingenerate hierarchy. In-jon is the universal subject of philosophical subject concepts which western philosophy have taken as main problem since Descartes. So we have to consider In-jon to be conceptual continuity concerning stream of history of ideas and communicate with ideas. A precedent study on ‘injon’ concept has weak conceptual analysis, which only emphasizes the greatness of mankind as compared with others. But that can’t reveal In-jon based on the Daesoon thought. So I try to engraft the concept on development of subject ideas to get academic objectivity. In-jon is great in having universal subject to expand the authority of God to all creation. That is the last goal which subject can reaches through the development. Considering this regard the research direction of this study is very encouraging and significant. Western philosophy has important philosopher of the three, Descartes, Kant, Hegel. Those are a spectrum who show an aspect of subject ideas. The subject idea has become the middle of philosophical system since Descartes in modern. It is the right and necessary process to philosophy because human being has spirit or reason connected with God. So In-jon in Daesoon thought is academic concept comprising ontological and epistemological properties. So I try to analyse In-jon through that and have In-jon join the ranks of mainstream academics in this paper.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 대순진리회 교무부, "전경" (2010), 대순진리회 출판부
  2. 대순진리회 교무부, "대순지침" (2010), 대순진리회 출판부
  3. 가토 히사타케, "헤겔사전" (2009), 도서출판b
  4. 김승남, "대순사상의 해원과 인존에 관한 연구", 박사, 대순종학, pp.2010
  5. 남경희, "플라톤 : 서양철학의 기원과 토대" (2006), 아카넷
  6. 남기호, "세계시민의 영원한 평화를 위한 단서조항(但書條項) -칸트와 헤겔의 전쟁과 평화 이론-", 시대와 철학, 21(4), pp.131~182 (2010), 한국철학사상연구회
  7. 빅토르 델보스, "스피노자와 도덕의 문제" (2003), 선학사
  8. 사카베 메구미, "칸트사전" (2009), 도서출판b
  9. 스피노자, "에티카" (2007), 서광사
  10. 아리스토텔레스, "정치학" (2009), 숲
  11. 요한네스 힐쉬베르거, "서양철학사" (2014), 이문출판사
  12. 윤재근, "대순사상의 인간형성 이론", 박사, pp.2002
  13. 이경원, "대순사상의 인간관 연구", 신종교연구, 12 (2005)
  14. 이경원, "한국 신종교와 대순사상" (2011), 문사철
  15. 이경원, "대순진리회 신앙론" (2012), 문사철
  16. 이경원, "대순종학원론" (2013), 문사철
  17. 이인식, "유토피아 이야기 : 세상이 두려워한 위험한 생각의 역사" (2007), 갤리온
  18. 정낙림, "데카르트와 칸트의 주체개념", 철학논총, 44 (1984)
  19. 칸트, "순수이성비판2" (2006), 아카넷
  20. 플라톤, "국가" (2013), 숲
  21. 헤겔, "정신현상학1" (2005), 한길사
  22. 헤겔, "정신현상학" (2011), 동서문화사
  23. 화이트헤드, "과정과 실재" (2003), 민음사
  24. W. L. westermann, "The slave system of greek and roman antiquity" (1955), American Philosophical Society

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)