본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

전자감시기술을 이용한 노동통제로부터의 근로자 권리 보장 방안

A Protection of Employee's Right against Surveillance in the Workplace

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Surveillance has continued at employers' necessity. However the problem is that substances and characteristics of surveillance are changing essentially because of the development of information and communication technologies. It has to be understood that new technology is easily used by people who have been vested rights. Therefore, it is important to regulate democratically by people of various classes' participating for preventing the reversing function and misuse of new technology. At once, criterions of normative judgment should be formed. I categorized surveillance according to purposes, objects, means and aspects of acts to establish a standard of regulation and derived criterions of constitutionality according to categories. First of all, surveillance category according to purposes is constitutional so far as it is not for disturbance of labor union because it satisfies the justice of purpose. Secondly, surveillance category according to objects can be judged the constitutionality in relevance to a work. The more it is relevant to a work, the more it is constitutional. The more it is relevant to a employee's privacy, the more it is unconstitutional because the suitability of means is not confirmed. When the suitability of means is confirmed, it can be judged whether the damage is the minimum or not. It is according to whether appeasement means can be used to accomplish purpose of surveillance or not. When the damage is the minimum, it should be judged the balance of the benefit and protection of law according to whether employer's interests are bigger than employee's or not. Eventually, when the balance of the benefit and protection of law is confirmed, surveillance can be said it is constitutional. However, as the final step, the constitutionality of surveillance should be judged by the aspect of act like recording, acquiring, keeping, analyzing and processing. There are limits from the root in the present laws. Therefore, I suggested the plan to provide for necessary mentioned items of the rules of employment or to stipulate for obligatory matters of decision and compulsory agenda of collective bargaining for employee can control their information on equal terms with employer. In addition, I propose not only safety regulations but also Technology Assessment for minimizing the employee's damage. TA is pertinent to prevent an abuse technology and perversion of human's life.

Abstract

Surveillance has continued at employers' necessity. However the problem is that substances and characteristics of surveillance are changing essentially because of the development of information and communication technologies. It has to be understood that new technology is easily used by people who have been vested rights. Therefore, it is important to regulate democratically by people of various classes' participating for preventing the reversing function and misuse of new technology. At once, criterions of normative judgment should be formed. I categorized surveillance according to purposes, objects, means and aspects of acts to establish a standard of regulation and derived criterions of constitutionality according to categories. First of all, surveillance category according to purposes is constitutional so far as it is not for disturbance of labor union because it satisfies the justice of purpose. Secondly, surveillance category according to objects can be judged the constitutionality in relevance to a work. The more it is relevant to a work, the more it is constitutional. The more it is relevant to a employee's privacy, the more it is unconstitutional because the suitability of means is not confirmed. When the suitability of means is confirmed, it can be judged whether the damage is the minimum or not. It is according to whether appeasement means can be used to accomplish purpose of surveillance or not. When the damage is the minimum, it should be judged the balance of the benefit and protection of law according to whether employer's interests are bigger than employee's or not. Eventually, when the balance of the benefit and protection of law is confirmed, surveillance can be said it is constitutional. However, as the final step, the constitutionality of surveillance should be judged by the aspect of act like recording, acquiring, keeping, analyzing and processing. There are limits from the root in the present laws. Therefore, I suggested the plan to provide for necessary mentioned items of the rules of employment or to stipulate for obligatory matters of decision and compulsory agenda of collective bargaining for employee can control their information on equal terms with employer. In addition, I propose not only safety regulations but also Technology Assessment for minimizing the employee's damage. TA is pertinent to prevent an abuse technology and perversion of human's life.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. 계희열, "헌법학(중)" (2004), 박영사
  2. 고영삼, "전자감시사회와 프라이버시" (1998), 한울
  3. 권영성, "헌법학원론" (2007), 법문사
  4. 김진영, "정보기술과 화이트칼라노동" (1993), 한울아카데미
  5. 김철수, "헌법학개론" (2007), 박영사
  6. 성낙인, "헌법학" (2007), 법문사
  7. 양건, "헌법학강의Ⅰ" (2007), 법문사
  8. 이준일, "헌법학강의" (2007), 홍문사
  9. 장영수, "헌법학" (2006), 홍문사
  10. 전광석, "한국헌법론" (2007), 법문사
  11. 정종섭, "헌법학원론" (2007), 박영사
  12. 홍성욱, "파놉티콘-정보사회 정보감옥" (2002), 책세상
  13. 허영, "한국헌법론" (2007), 박영사
  14. 사업장 전자감시로부터 근로자의 인권보호 방안 검토보고서, "국가인권위원회 인권연구팀", ~ (2007)
  15. 사업장 감시시스템이 노동인권에 미치는 영향, 2005년 인권상황실태조사 연구용, "국가인권위원회", ~ (2005)
  16. 정보화에 따른 프라이버시권 침해법령 조사 연구, 2002년도 인권상황실태조사 연구용역보고서, "국가인권위원회", ~ (2002)
  17. 권순원, "전자감시적 노동통제와 노동규율", 정보기술과 작업장감시 워크숍 자료집 (1998)
  18. 김배원, "정보기본권의 독자성과 타당범위에 대한 고찰 - 헌법개정과 관련한 체계구성을 중심으로 -", 헌법학연구, 12(4), pp.199~232 (2006), 한국헌법학회
  19. 김선택, "행복추구권과 “헌법에 열거되지 아니한 권리”의 기본권 체계적 해석", 안암법학, (창간), pp.177~203 (1993), 안암법학회
  20. 김선택, "헌법 제9조 제1문 전단 ‘인간으로서의 존엄’의 의미와 법적 성격", 석사, pp.1983
  21. 김영권, "한국에서의 전자감시적 노동통제에 관한 사례 연구", 2004산업사회학회 춘계대회 발표문 (2004)
  22. "노동자감시근절을위한연대모임, 노동자감시 시스템 실시 및 노동자 인식 조사 결과,노동감시 실태조사 결과 발표 및 노동감시 근절대책 촉구 기자회견 보도자료,2003. 7.31", ~ (2003)
  23. 성낙인, "행정상 개인정보보호", 공법연구, 22(3) (1994), 한국공법학회
  24. 이병훈, "전자감시와 노동자 반응: A은행 콜센터 사례연구", 산업노동연구, 10(2), pp.67~88 (2004), 한국산업노동학회
  25. 이인호, "한국 정보법의 발전동향 - 정보공개법과 개인정보보호법을 중심으로 -, 한국공법학회 제136회 학술발표회 ‘한국과 독일의 정보법 발전’, 한국공법학회, 2007. 5. 18., 31-61쪽", ~ (2007)
  26. 이창범, "사업장내 전자우편감시제도에 관한 연구", 노동정책연구, 5(4), pp.135~192 (2005), 한국노동연구원
  27. 하경효, "새로운 근로감시기술의 도입에 따른 법적 문제", 노동법학, (18), pp.99~155 (2004), 한국노동법학회
  28. 2006 헌법개정연구귀원회 최종보고서 ‘헌법개정연구’, "한국헌법학회", 한국헌법학회, ~ (2006)
  29. Bogard, William, "The Simulation of Surveillance : Hypercontrol in Telematics Societies" (1996), Cambridge University Press
  30. Dandeker Cristopher, (1990), Surveillance Power and Modernity Polity Press
  31. Edwards, Richard, "Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century" (1979), Basic Books
  32. Flaherty, David, "Protecting Privacy in Surveillance Societies" (1989), University of North Carolina Press
  33. Foucault, Michel, "Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison" (2003), Pantheon Books
  34. Gandy, Oscar H., "The Surveillance Society: Information Technology and Breaucratic Social Control", Journal of Communication, 39(3) (1989)
  35. Giddens, Anthony, "Modernity and Self-Identity" (1991), Stanford University Press
  36. Giddens, Anthony, "The Nation-State and Violence" (1985), University of California Press
  37. Lyon, David, "Surveillance Society : Monitoring Everyday Life" (2001), Taylor & Francis
  38. Lyon, David, "The Electronic Eye : The Rise of Surveillance Society" (1994), Blackwell

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)