혼혈인 병역면제의 평등권 침해성
Constitutional Issues on the Exemption of the Mixed Blood from Military Service
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The mixed blood are in effect exempted from the military service by being enrolled into the second category of the national service. The exemption from the military service means apparently a kind of more favorable discrimination for the mixed blood. However, the exemption from the military service can be a less favorable discrimination against the mixed blood, because the military service is able to be understood as a qualification or a competence. Furthermore, whether the mixed blood are exempted from the military service is apparently determined by their free will, but they are in effect forced to determine the exemption. From this aspect, the exemption from the military service must be a less favorable discrimination against the mixed blood. In Korea, the de facto discrimination against the mixed blood has a long history and it is severe and present. Therefore, the de facto discrimination against the mixed blood has an legally important meaning and has to be necessarily considered in the discussion on the issue of the discrimination against the mixed blood.
Abstract
The mixed blood are in effect exempted from the military service by being enrolled into the second category of the national service. The exemption from the military service means apparently a kind of more favorable discrimination for the mixed blood. However, the exemption from the military service can be a less favorable discrimination against the mixed blood, because the military service is able to be understood as a qualification or a competence. Furthermore, whether the mixed blood are exempted from the military service is apparently determined by their free will, but they are in effect forced to determine the exemption. From this aspect, the exemption from the military service must be a less favorable discrimination against the mixed blood. In Korea, the de facto discrimination against the mixed blood has a long history and it is severe and present. Therefore, the de facto discrimination against the mixed blood has an legally important meaning and has to be necessarily considered in the discussion on the issue of the discrimination against the mixed blood.
참고문헌 (20)
- 김성윤, "하인스 워드 - 인종의 정치가 시작됐다 -", 문화과학, (가을)통권 : 47, pp.315~333 (2006)
- 김하수, "한국 사회의 소수자에 대한 사회언어학적 접근", 사회언어학, 16(1), pp.79~104 (2008), 한국사회언어학회
- 김현선, "국민, 半국민, 非국민: 한국 국민형성의 원리와 과정", 사회연구, 7(2), pp.79~108 (2006), 한국사회조사연구소
- 김홍수영, "시민성을 기준으로 조명한 사회적 소수자의 권리 노숙인 사례를 중심으로", 경제와 사회, (65), pp.179~200 (2005), 비판사회학회
- 류상태, "“단일민족 콤플렉스”를 넘어서 - 혼혈자를 향한 한국사회의 윤리적 고찰 -", 철학과 현실, (가을)통권 : 70, pp.97~103 (2006), 철학문화연구소
- 박경태, "한국사회의 인종차별: 외국인 노동자, 화교, 혼혈인", 역사비평, (가을)통권 : 48, pp.189~208 (1999)
- 박경태, "날마다 자신을 확인해야 하는 사람들 - 혼혈인을 만나다", 당대비평, 통권 : 25, pp.234~243 (2004)
- 설동훈, "혼혈인의 사회학: 한국인의 위계적 민족성", 인문연구, (52), pp.127~164 (2007), 인문과학연구소
- 염철현, "브라운 판결의 교육사적 의의 및 시사점", 비교교육연구, 16(3), pp.141~164 (2006), 한국비교교육학회
- 염철현, "미국의 적극적 차별 수정 정책(Affirmative Action)의 전개과정과 시사점", 비교교육연구, 16(4), pp.113~5 (2006), 한국비교교육학회
- 이철우, "국적과 종족성에 의한 집단적 자아와 타자의 구별", 사회이론, 23, pp.13~47 (2003), 한국사회이론학회
- 이혜령, "인종과 젠더, 그리고 민족 동일성의 역학― 1920∼30년대 염상섭 소설에 나타난 혼혈아의 정체성 ―", 현대소설연구, 18, pp.197~218 (2003), 한국현대소설학회
- 정의철, "혼혈인에 대한 미디어 보도 분석: 하인스 워드의 성공 전후를 중심으로", 한국언론학보, 51(5), pp.84~110 (2007), 한국언론학회
- 최강민, "단일민족의 신화와 혼혈인", 어문논집, 35, pp.287~314 (2006), 중앙어문학회
- 홍성방, "국민의 기본의무 ― 독일에서의 논의를 중심으로 ―", 공법연구, 34(4-2), pp.311~338 (2006), 한국공법학회
- 홍 성 필, "국제인권과 결혼이주", 저스티스, (96), pp.27~42 (2007), 한국법학원
- 국가인권위원회, "기지촌 혼혈인 인권실태조사", ~ (2003)
- Boyle, Kevin, "A Critical Evaluation of International Human Rights Approaches to Racism, in: Discrimination and Human Rights: The Case of Racism", pp.135~191 (2001)
- Fredmann, Sandra, "Combating Racism with Human Rights: The Right to Equality, in: Discrimination and Human Rights: The Case of Racism", pp.9~44 (2001)
- Petrova, Dimitrina, "Racial Discrimination and the Rights of Minority Cultures, in: Discrimination and Human Rights: The Case of Racism", pp.45~76 (2001)