Copy theory of movement and apparent ECM constructions
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper reassesses a recent conceptualization of movement, the copy theory of movement (CTM, henceforth) and examines if CTM successfully accounts for so-called ECM constructions in Japanese and Korean (J/K). Despite various conceptual and empirical advantages it does have, CTM leads to non-trivial problems in the application to the analysis of so-called J/K ECM constructions. In this paper, we go over Abe’s (2013) implementation of Japanese ECM constructions based on CTM. Despite an interesting formulation of P-L Match condition coupled with CTM, his proposal poses a number of empirical as well as conceptual problems when applied to Japanese and Korean. As an alternative, we propose FocP for apparent ECM constructions in Korean. In particular, the Acc-marked NP (or DP) is proposed to occupy the Spec of Focus Phrase, which is posited on top of CP layer. We then show how the proposed analysis accounts for a variety of empirical phenomena attested in apparent Korean ECM constructions.
Abstract
This paper reassesses a recent conceptualization of movement, the copy theory of movement (CTM, henceforth) and examines if CTM successfully accounts for so-called ECM constructions in Japanese and Korean (J/K). Despite various conceptual and empirical advantages it does have, CTM leads to non-trivial problems in the application to the analysis of so-called J/K ECM constructions. In this paper, we go over Abe’s (2013) implementation of Japanese ECM constructions based on CTM. Despite an interesting formulation of P-L Match condition coupled with CTM, his proposal poses a number of empirical as well as conceptual problems when applied to Japanese and Korean. As an alternative, we propose FocP for apparent ECM constructions in Korean. In particular, the Acc-marked NP (or DP) is proposed to occupy the Spec of Focus Phrase, which is posited on top of CP layer. We then show how the proposed analysis accounts for a variety of empirical phenomena attested in apparent Korean ECM constructions.
참고문헌 (47)
- Abe, J., "String-Vacuity and LF Interpretation in A-Chains: Cases of ECM and Nominative-Genitive Conversion", 석사, pp.2012
- Abe, J., "Pronunciation and LF interpretation in the ECM construction", Paper presented at SICOGG 15 (2013), Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
- Biber, D., "The Longman grammar of spoken and written English" (1999), Longman
- Choi, Y-J., "Dependent Marking Parameter : Coordination, Clefting, Fragments and Scrambling in Korean and Japanese", pp.2007
- Chomsky, N., "The View from Building 20" (1993), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Step by Step: Essays in Honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud", pp.133~166 (2008), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research 1", pp.506~569 (1993)
- Walter de Gruyter., "Chomsky's Universal Grammar: An Introduction" (2008), Wiley-Blackwell
- Fox, D., "Reconstruction, binding theory, and the interpretation of chains", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.157~186 (1999)
- Fujii, T., "Some Theoretical Issues in Japanese Control", 박사, pp.2006
- Haegeman, L., "Introduction to government and binding theory. Second edition" (1998), Blackwell
- Hale, K., "Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 1, pp.5~47 (1983)
- Han, C., "V-raising and grammar competition in Korean : evidence from negation and quantifier float", Linguistic Inquiry, 38(1), pp.1~47 (2007)
- Hornstein, N., "A theory of syntax: minimal operations and universal grammar" (2009), Cambridge University Press
- Multiple agree., the defective intervention constraint in Japanese, "Hiraiwa, K.", MIT, 67~80, pp.Working Papers in Linguistics 40 (2001)
- Hong, S., "A note on ‘Raising to Object’ in small clauses and full clauses", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 19, pp.275~289 (2010)
- Hornstein, N., "Movement theory of control", pp.1~41 (2008), John Benjamins
- Hornstein, N., "Movement and control", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.69~96 (1999)
- Hornstein, N., "Move A minimalist theory of construal" (2001), Blackwell
- Huddleston, R., "A Student's Introduction to English Grammar" (2007), Cambridge University Press
- Johnson, K., "Object Positions", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 9, pp.577~636 (1991)
- Kang, M-Y., "Topics in Korean syntax", 박사, pp.1988
- 김정석, "Depictives in VP Anaphora", 언어, 36(4), pp.843~862 (2011), 한국언어학회
- Kobayashi, K., "A Non-Exceptional Approach to Exceptional Case-Marking in Japanese", English Linguistics, 19(2), pp.211~238 (2002)
- Koizumi, M., "Phrase Structure in Minimalist Syntax", 박사, pp.1995
- Koopman, H., "The syntax of verbs : From verb movement rules in the Kru languages to Universal Grammar" (1984), Foris Publications
- Kuno, S., "Syntax and semantics 5: Japanese generative grammar", pp.17~49 (1976), Academic Press
- Kuroda, S. -Y., "Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language", 박사, pp.1965
- Larson, R., "Bare-NP adverbs", Linguistic Inquiry, 14, pp.595~621 (1985)
- Lasnik, H., "Working Minimalism", pp.189~215 (1999), MIT Press
- Lasnik, H., "On the subject of infinitives", Papers from the 27th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.324~343 (1991)
- Lee, W., "Asymmetric Temporal Interpretation in Untensed Conjuncts Revisited", International Conference on Linguistics in Korea (ICLK), pp.333~348 (2007), Seoul National University
- 이우승, "ECM Constructions Redux", 언어, 37(3), pp.697~717 (2012), 한국언어학회
- 이정식, "Approximate Cleft and Its Implication for Copula Overuse", 생성문법연구, 23(3), pp.603~614 (2013), 한국생성문법학회
- Monahan, Philip J., "Backward object control in Korean", Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp.356~369 (2003), Cascadilla Press
- Monahan, Philip J., "Backward object control in Korean", 석사, pp.2005
- Polinsky, M., "Backward Control", Linguistic Inquiry, 33, pp.245~282 (2002)
- Polinsky, M., "Expanding the Scope of Control and Raising", Syntax, 9, pp.171~192 (2006)
- Polinsky, M., "Object control in Korean : Obligatory vs. non-obligatory control", ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 47, pp.197~217 (2007)
- Potsdam, E., "Malagasy Backward Object Control", Language, 85, pp.754~784 (2009)
- Korean Linguistics 8, "Japanese", pp.1998, Sakai, H.
- Sener, S., "Nanzan Linguistics 6", pp.79~99 (2010), Nanzan University: Center for Linguistics
- Schutze, Carlson T., "Why Korean case-stacking isn’t?", NELS, 26, pp.351~165 (1996)
- Ura, H., "Multiple Feature-Checking : A Theory of Grammatical Function Splitting", 박사, pp.1996
- Yoon, J., "Raising of major arguments in Korean and Japanese", Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 25(3), pp.615~653 (2007)