A Raising-to-Object Analysis of Korean ECM Constructions
2
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Korean ECM constructions are accounted for in terms of Raising to Object (RTO) in this paper. First, I propose that Korean ECM constructions are not actually ECMed but raised to the matrix Spec of VP by raising to object (RTO) (Postal 1974 and Lasnik and Saito 1991). Data related with Binding Condition A and B, passivization, sentential adverb placement, floated quantifiers, NPI, scope, scrambling, cleft constructions, and others are provided to support the claim that the complement subject is actually raised. Second, I propose that raising of the complement subject to the matrix clause is not optional as argued in Yang (2003) but obligatory. Third, adopting Miyagawa (2005) and Chomsky (2005, 2006), I propose that the V-focus feature inherited from the phase head v makes RTO possible, providing both accusative Case checking and focus reading at the matrix V. Forth, it is claimed that the Spec of CP is analyzed as an A-position by the manner the position is derived following Chomsky (2005).
Abstract
The Korean ECM constructions are accounted for in terms of Raising to Object (RTO) in this paper. First, I propose that Korean ECM constructions are not actually ECMed but raised to the matrix Spec of VP by raising to object (RTO) (Postal 1974 and Lasnik and Saito 1991). Data related with Binding Condition A and B, passivization, sentential adverb placement, floated quantifiers, NPI, scope, scrambling, cleft constructions, and others are provided to support the claim that the complement subject is actually raised. Second, I propose that raising of the complement subject to the matrix clause is not optional as argued in Yang (2003) but obligatory. Third, adopting Miyagawa (2005) and Chomsky (2005, 2006), I propose that the V-focus feature inherited from the phase head v makes RTO possible, providing both accusative Case checking and focus reading at the matrix V. Forth, it is claimed that the Spec of CP is analyzed as an A-position by the manner the position is derived following Chomsky (2005).
참고문헌 (60)
- Ahn, "Functional categories in Korean In Harvard Studies on Korean Linguistics", susumu ku, pp.79~88 (1989), Harvard University
- Bokovi, eljko, "The syntax of nonfinite complementation: An economy approach" (1997), Cambridge, Mass.:MIT press
- Bokovi, eljko, "A-movement and the EPP", 53, pp.167~218 (2002), Blackwell
- Bokovi, eljko, "Case checking vs. Case assignment and the Case of adverbial NPs", 37, pp.522~533 (2006)
- Bresnan, "Theory of complementation in English Syntax" (1972)
- Brody, "Some remarks on the Focus field in Hungarian UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2", pp.201~225 (1990)
- Brody, Michael, "Focus and checking theory", pp.31~43 (1995), Szeged:Joseph Attila University
- Bruening, Benjamin, "Syntax at the edge: Cross-clausal phenomena and the syntax of Passamaquoddy" (2001)
- "Lecture on Government and Binding", (am) (1981)
- Chomsky, Noam, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Minimalist inquiries: The framework", pp.89~155 (2000), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Derivation by phase", (am), pp.1~52 (2001), Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "On phases", (am) (2005), Ms., MIT, Mass.: Cambridge
- Noam, "The theory of principled parameters An international handbook of contemporary research Amim von Stechow Reprinted in Noam Chomsky", pp.506 13~569 127, and Theo Vannemann MIT Press
- Dikken, Marcel den, "Relators and Linkers: The syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas" (2006), Cambridge, Ma: MIT
- Epstein, Samuel D., "Derivation in minimalism Exploring the elimination of A-chains and the EPP" (2006), Cambridge: Cambridge University press
- Hiraiwa, Ken, "Multiple Agree and the defective intervention constraint in Japanese", pp.67~80 (2001)
- Hiraiwa, Ken, "Raising and intermediate-agreement"
- Hong, Sungshim, "Raising of objects in small clauses", 30, pp.89~108 (2002)
- Horvath, "Focus in the theory of grammar and the syntax of Hungarian" (1986)
- Huang, "Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar" (1982)
- Jeong, Yongkil, "COMP -ko and Case markers", 9, pp.39~87 (1999)
- Jung, Yeun-Jin, "Multiple Case marking and its PF interpretation", 26, pp.239~268 (2001)
- Jung, Yeun-Jin, "Case, focus, and movement to the phase edge", 14, pp.77~107 (2006)
- Kang, Bosook, "Some peculiarities of Korean kes cleft constructions", 60, pp.251~281 (2006)
- Kawai, Michiya, "Raising to object in Japanese: A small clause analysis", 37, pp.329~339 (2006)
- Kim, Dongseok, "Korean ECM constructions and the theory of phase", 33, pp.47~77 (2003)
- Kim, Sun-Woong, "Predicate raising and complementizers", 17, pp.265~181 (2007)
- Kim, "The syntax and semantics of Korean Case The interaction between lexical and syntactic levels of representation" (1990), Harvard University
- Ko, Heejeong, "Constraining scrambling: Cyclic linearization and subject movement" (2004)
- Ko, Heejeong, "Asymmetries in scrambling and cyclic linearization", 38, pp.49~83 (2007)
- Koizumi, "MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18", pp.99~148 (1993)
- Koizumi, Masatoshi, "Phrase structure in minimalist syntax" (1995)
- Cambridge, "The structure of the Japanese language", ku (1973), MIT Press
- Kuroda, "Remarks on the notion of subject with reference to words like also even or only illustrating certain manners in which formal systems are employed as auxiliary devices in linguistic descriptions University of Tokyo reprinted in Papers in Japanese Linguistics 11", pp.127 157~152 202 (1971)
- Lasnik, Howard, "Chains of arguments", pp.189~215 (1999), Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press
- Howard, "On the subject of infinitives In Papers from the Twenty-seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society", pp.324~343 (1991)
- Lee, Doo-Won, "Structural Case-driven object shift of ECMed nominals out of the CP", 15, pp.39~63 (2007)
- Lee, "University of Connecticut" (1992), On the extended projection principle
- Lee, Hyeran, "A Study on Scrambling in Korean: The Minimalist Approach.", 16, pp.425~460 (2006)
- Lee, "Case alternation in Korean University of Connecticut" (1992)
- Lee, "Scrambling as Case Driven obligatory Movement University of Pennsylvania" (1993)
- McCloskey, "Quantifier float and wh-movement in an Irish English", pp.57~84 (2000)
- Miyagawa, Shigeru, "Unifying agreement and agreement-less languages", 2 (2005), MITWPL
- Ormazabal, J., "The syntax of complementation: On the connection between syntactic structure and selection" (1995)
- RizRizzi, Luigizi, "The fine structure of left periphery", pp.281~337 (1997), Dordrecht: Kluwer
- Saito, "Long-distance scrambling in Japanese Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1", pp.69~118 (1992)
- Schtze, Carson T. R, "INFL in child and adult language: Agreement, Case and licensing" (1997)
- Schtze, Carson T. R., "On the nature of default case", 4(3), pp.205~238 (2001)
- Sohn, Keun-Won, "Negative polarity items, scope and economy" (1995)
- Szczegielniak, Adam, "Multiple spell-out", pp.251~282 (1999), Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press
- Takahashi, "Minimality of movement University of Connecticut" (1994)
- Tanaka, Hidekazu, "Raising to object out of CP", 33(4), pp.637~652 (2002)
- Uchibori, Asako, "The syntax of subjunctive complements Evidence from Japanese" (2000)
- Uchibori, Asako, "Raising out of CP and C-T relations", 41, pp.145~162 (2001), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT
- Yang, Dong-Whee, "Optionality, output effects, and the EPP", 32, pp.43~68 (2003)
- Yoon, Hang-Jin, "ECM in Korean", 37, pp.27~57 (2004)
- Yoon, "ECM and multiple subject constructions in Korean Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics III", pp.369~381 (1989)
- Yoon, "The syntax of A-chains A typological study of ECM and scrambling" (1991), Cornell University
- Yoon, "University of Texas" (1990)
