Onions (1932) 문장 5형식에 대한 이원적 접근—Be-동사 vs. Be-동사 이외의 동사
A Binary Approach on Onions (1932), based on Generative Grammar —Be vs. non-Be Verbs
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Onions‘s (1932) structural classification on the English sentence structures has had much influence on the school grammar of the language. The school grammar based on Onions's (1932) classification, however, has been a significant impediment for the learners of English. This paper summarizes the sentence forms of Onions (1932) and discusses how inefficient it is, and then suggests an alternative developed from Generative Grammar. This paper, more concretely, accepts that sentences(phases in Chomsky (1999); XP in GB) have (some) binary structures, [β P [α [SUBJ [H YP]]]] of Chomsky (1999: 5), that is, a sentence is derived in binary: H(head) + YP(complements) → [H YP]; [H YP] + SUBJ → [SUBJ [H YP]], which forms a phase called 'α,' [α [SUBJ [H YP]]]; [α [SUBJ [H YP]]] + P → [β P [α [SUBJ [H YP]]]], a phase called 'β'; these [...] are all phases by Chomsky (1999). According to the assumption, this paper shows that, since the structures are more simple than those of Onions (1932), the binary structure can explain the sentence structures more easily. This paper, in addition, shows that this assumption is much closer to universal grammar(UG).
Abstract
Onions‘s (1932) structural classification on the English sentence structures has had much influence on the school grammar of the language. The school grammar based on Onions's (1932) classification, however, has been a significant impediment for the learners of English. This paper summarizes the sentence forms of Onions (1932) and discusses how inefficient it is, and then suggests an alternative developed from Generative Grammar. This paper, more concretely, accepts that sentences(phases in Chomsky (1999); XP in GB) have (some) binary structures, [β P [α [SUBJ [H YP]]]] of Chomsky (1999: 5), that is, a sentence is derived in binary: H(head) + YP(complements) → [H YP]; [H YP] + SUBJ → [SUBJ [H YP]], which forms a phase called 'α,' [α [SUBJ [H YP]]]; [α [SUBJ [H YP]]] + P → [β P [α [SUBJ [H YP]]]], a phase called 'β'; these [...] are all phases by Chomsky (1999). According to the assumption, this paper shows that, since the structures are more simple than those of Onions (1932), the binary structure can explain the sentence structures more easily. This paper, in addition, shows that this assumption is much closer to universal grammar(UG).
참고문헌 (32)
- 양동휘, "최소이론에서 필수이론으로. 현대언어학 지금어디로" (1994), 한신문화사
- 선종철, "허사 there구문의 격자질과 EPP", 박사, pp.2002
- 선종철, "허사 there의 구조격*", 생성문법연구, 14(1), pp.59~85 (2004), 한국생성문법학회
- Anderson, J. M, "The Grammar of Case: Towards a Localistic Theory. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 4" (1971), Cambridge Univ. Press
- Anderson, S. R, "Pro-Sentential Forms and Their Implications for English Sentence Structure", NSF, 20, pp.1~43 (1968)
- Belletti, A, "The case of unaccusative", Linguistics Inquiry, 19, pp.1~34 (1988)
- Boeckx. C, "Interpreting A-chains at the interface", NELS, 30 (2000)
- Burzio, L, "Italian Syntaz" (1986), Reidel
- Chomsky, N, "Aspects of the Theory of Syntax" (1965), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky, N, "Knowledge of Language: Its Nature" (1986), Praeger
- Chomsky, N, "A minimalist program for linguistic theory. in the view from building 20 in:Essays linguistics in honor of S. Bromberger", pp.1~52 (1993), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "Derivation by phase", MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 18 (1999)
- Chomsky, N, "Minimalist inquiries in:Step by Step: Essays on minimalism in honor of H", pp.89~155 (2000), Lasnik
- Chomsky, N, "Beyond explanatory adequacy", 석사, pp.2001
- Cook, W. A, "Case Grammar Development of the Matrix Model (1970-1978)" (1979), Georgetown Univ. Press
- Fillmore, C. J, "A Proposal Concerning English Preposition", Georgetown, 19, pp.19~33 (1966)
- Fillmore, C. J, "The Grammar of HITTING and BREAKING", Ohio, 1, pp.9~29 (1967)
- Fillmore, C. J, "The Case for Case in:Universals in Linguistic Theory" (1968), Rinehart & Winston
- Jepersen, O, "Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Heidelberg: Carl Winter" (1909), George Allen & Unwin. Copenhagen: Munksgaard
- Jepersen, O, "The Philosophy of Grammar. London: George Allen & Unwin" (1924), Norton
- Jepersen, O, "Analytic Syntax. London: George Allen & Unwin. Copenhagen: Munkagaard. Rpt" (1937), Holt, Renehart & Winston
- Lasnik, H, "Case and Expletives Revisited: On greed and other human failings", Linguistic Inquiry, 26, pp.615~633 (1995)
- Lyons, John, "Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics" (1968), Cambridge Univ. Press
- Martin, Roger, "Null Case and the distribution of PRO", Linguistic Inquiry, 32(1) (2001)
- McFadden, T, "Syntactic Case, the EPP, and the subjects of embedded clauses in The position of morphological Case in the derivation; A study on the syntax-morphology interface", 박사, pp.2004
- Onions, C. T, "An Advanced English Syntax" (1932), The Macmillan
- A different case against Case Adjacency, "Pettiward, A", MIT, ~, pp.Working Papers in Linguistics 36 (2000)
- Quirk, "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
- Ross, J. R, "Constraints on variables in syntax", 박사, pp.1967
- Ura, Hi, "Case. The Handbook of Syntactic Theory" (2001), Black well