본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

부정극어와 의문문의 의미와 화용

On Some Semantic and Pragmatic Properties of Negative Polarity Items and Questions

홍민표
한국현대언어학회 (The Modern Linguistic Society Of Korea)|2010.12|언어연구 (Linguistic Research)|제27권 제3호|pp. 557-579|DOI 10.17250/khisli.27.3.201012.009

1

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

questionsentropyalternativesnegative polarity itemsdecision theoryfree choice itemsdownward entailingscalar assertion
주제분류언어학

초록

Previous literature on the semantics and pragmatics of English negative polarity items and questions is critically reviewed in this paper. Various attempts to solve the puzzle behind the English any are classified into two major groups, namely semantically motivated approaches and those that are pragmatically motivated. It is argued that the two most-widely accepted views (the domain-widening approach of Kadmon & Landman (1993) and the scalar assertion approach of Krifka (1995)) are different from other approaches in the sense that they are pragmatically motivated and can provide greater explanatory adequacy than the semantics-based accounts. The paper also discusses the negative polarity items in interrogative sentences and provides a future direction of research on polarity-sensitivity phenomena.

Abstract

Previous literature on the semantics and pragmatics of English negative polarity items and questions is critically reviewed in this paper. Various attempts to solve the puzzle behind the English any are classified into two major groups, namely semantically motivated approaches and those that are pragmatically motivated. It is argued that the two most-widely accepted views (the domain-widening approach of Kadmon & Landman (1993) and the scalar assertion approach of Krifka (1995)) are different from other approaches in the sense that they are pragmatically motivated and can provide greater explanatory adequacy than the semantics-based accounts. The paper also discusses the negative polarity items in interrogative sentences and provides a future direction of research on polarity-sensitivity phenomena.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. Bolinger, D, "Degree Words" (1972), Mouton
  2. Borkin, A, "Polarity Items in Questions", Chicago Linguistic Society, 7, pp.53~62 (1971)
  3. Pragmatics Interface in:The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. vol. 3. Structures and Beyond, "Scalar Implicature, Polarity Phenomena, and the Syntax", pp.2004, Chierchia, G
  4. Chierchia, G, "Broaden Your Views: Implicatures of Domain Widening and the "Logicality" of Language", Linguistic Inquiry, 37, pp.535~590 (2006)
  5. Choi, J, "Free Choice and Negative Polarity: A Compositional Analysis of Korean Polarity Sensitive Items", 박사, pp.2007
  6. Dayal, V, "Any as Inherently Modal", Linguistics and Philosophy, 21, pp.433~476 (1998)
  7. yal, V, "The Universal Force of Free Choice Any. Linguistic Variation Yearbook. vol. 4", pp.5~40 (2004), John Benjamins Publishing Co
  8. Fauconnier, G, "Pragmatic Entailment and Questions in:Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics" (1980), Reidel
  9. von Fintel, K, "NPI Licensing, Strawson Entailment, and Context Dependency", Journal of Semantics, 16, pp.97~148 (1999)
  10. Giannakidou, A, "The Landscape of Polarity Items", 박사, pp.1997
  11. Giannakidou, A, "The Meaning of Free Choice", Linguistics and Philosophy, 24, pp.659~735 (2001)
  12. Giannakidou, A, "Only, Emotive Factive Verbs and the Dual Nature of Polarity Dependency", Language, 82, pp.575~603 (2006)
  13. Giannakidou, A, "The Landscape of EVEN", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, pp.39~81 (2007)
  14. Giannakidou, A, "(In)definiteness, Polarity and the Role of wh-morphology in Free Choice", Journal of Semantics, 23, pp.135~183 (2007)
  15. Groenendijk, J, "Studies in the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers", 박사, pp.1984
  16. Guerzoni, E, "A Question of Strength: On NPIs in Interrogative Clauses", Linguistics and Philosophy, 30, pp.361~391 (2007)
  17. Hamblin, C.L, "Questions in Montague English", Foundations of Language, 10, pp.41~53 (1973)
  18. Heim, I, "A Note on Negative Polarity and Downward Entaillingness", NELS, 14, pp.98~107 (1984)
  19. Hoeksema, J, "There Is No Number Effect in the Licensing of Negative Polarity Items: A Reply to Guerzoni and Sharvit", Linguistics and Philosophy, 31, pp.397~407 (2008)
  20. Horn, L, "On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English", 박사, pp.1972
  21. Horn, L, "Flaubert Triggers, Squatitive Negation, and Other Quirks of Grammar in:Perspectives on Negation and Polarity Items" (2001), John Benjamins
  22. Horn, L, "Airport '86 Revisited: Toward a Unified Indefinite any", Reference and Quantification: The Partee Effect, pp.179~205 (2005), CSLI Publications
  23. Kadmon, N, "Any", Linguistics and Philosophy, 16, pp.353~422 (1993)
  24. Krazter, A, "Indeterminate Pronouns: The View from Japanese", Proceedings of the Third Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, pp.1~25 (2002), Hituzi Syoho
  25. Krifka, M, "Polarity Phenomena and Alternative Semantics", In Proceedings of the 7th Amsterdam Colloquium (1990), ITLI
  26. Krifka, M, "Some Remarks on Polarity Items. In Semantic Universals and Universal Semantics", pp.150~189 (1992), Foris
  27. Krifka, M, "The Semantics and Pragmatics of Polarity Items", Linguistic Analysis, 25, pp.209~257 (1995)
  28. Ladusaw, W, "Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relation", 박사, pp.1979
  29. LeGrand, J, "Or and Any: The Syntax and Semantics of Two Logical Operators", 박사, pp.1975
  30. Linebarger, M.C, "The Grammar of Negative Polarity", 박사, pp.1980
  31. Linebarger, M.C, "Negative Polarity and Grammatical Representation", Linguistics and Philosophy, 10, pp.325~387 (1987)
  32. Negative Polarity as Linguistic Evidence, "Linebarger, M.C", Chicago Linguistic Society, 165~188 (1991)
  33. Menéndez-Benito, P, "The Grammar of Choice", 박사, pp.2005
  34. Menéndez-Benito, P, "On Universal Free Choice Items", Natural Language Semantics, 18, pp.33~64 (2010)
  35. Nam, S, "Another Type of Negative Polarity Item in:Perspectives on Negation and Polarity Items" (1994), CSLI
  36. Information Structure in Discourse: Towards an Integrated Formal Theory of Pragmatics, "Roberts, C", Ohio State University, ~, pp.Working Papers in Linguistics. Vol. 49 (1996)
  37. Rooth, M, "A Theory of Focus Interpretation", Natural Language Semantics, 1, pp.75~116 (1992)
  38. van Rooy, R, "Negative Polarity Items in Questions: Strength as Relevance", Journal of Semantics, 20, pp.239~273 (2003)
  39. Russell, B, "Against Grammatical Computation of Scalar Implicatures", Journal of Semantics, 23, pp.361~382 (2006)
  40. Shannon, C, "The Mathematical Theory of Communication", Bell System Technical Journal, 27, pp.372~423 (1948)
  41. van der Wouden, T, "Polarity and Illogical Negation in:Dynamics, Polarity, and Quantification" (1994), CSLI
  42. Zwarts, F, "The Syntax and Semantics of Negative Polarity in:Views on the Syntax-Semantics Interface II" (1990), Berlin
  43. Zwarts, F, "Three Types of Polarity", 박사, pp.1993
  44. Zwarts, F, "Nonveridical Contexts", Linguistic Analysis, 25, pp.286~312 (1995)
  45. Zwarts, F, "Three Types of Polarity in:Plural Quantification" (1998), Kluwer

관련 논문AI추천

국어의 극어 형성에 대한 의미․화용론적 연구김윤신사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학2021 · 제89호Argument Negative Polarity Items in Korean최영식한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2010 · 제26권 제1호부정극어에 관한 연구 - 영어와 한국어를 중심으로 -안남용한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2014 · 제30권 제1호On the Ambiguity of (Negative) Interrogatives최현숙한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2015 · 제25권 제1호영어부정의 화용론적 접근박영근대한영어영문학회 · 영어영문학연구2012 · 제38권 제3호On negative polarity items and free choice items in English with special reference to inherently negative predicate constructions송홍기한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2014 · 제31권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

A Clitic Verb Analysis of the Korean Copula -i-채희락, 노창화pp. 393-407A Study on Hindi Infinitive Constructions: Lexical and Phrasal Nominalizations조정민pp. 409-427Deficits in the perception of English word-initial consonant clusters by Korean learners of English장우혁pp. 429-446The Effects of Storytelling on Adult English Language Learners김미령pp. 447-473A Conceptual Model of Korean University EFL Learners’ Writing Performance김영상pp. 475-498
원문 보기