Correlation between semantic compatibility and frequency: A usage-based approach
2
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigates the nature of semantic compatibility between constructions and lexical items that occur in them, in relation with language use. The usage-based model, proposed by Langacker (1987), assumes that linguistic knowledge (grammar) is grounded in language use. However, the relation between the linguistic knowledge and usage has not been empirically tested. This study shows that semantic compatibility between linguistic elements is a gradient phenomenon, and that speakers’ knowledge about the degree of semantic compatibility is intimately correlated with language use, specifically frequency of use. To show this, I investigate linguistic knowledge of the semantic compatibility between the English ditransitive construction (DC) and various verbs that occur in the DC. I set up five semantic compatibility categories, and categorized various verbs according to the degree that the verb implies “successful transfer of possession” (Goldberg 1995). Then, I obtained frequency pattern of the verbs and the DC by using collexeme analysis (Stefanowitsch and Gries 2003), which is a method of measuring relative frequency of co-occurrences of a lexical item and a particular construction. I finally correlated the semantic compatibility of various verbs and the result of collexeme analysis. My findings specifically show that the more compatible a verb is with the construction, the more frequent it will be used in the construction. The empirical data support the assumption of the usage-based model that grammar and usage are closely related.
Abstract
This study investigates the nature of semantic compatibility between constructions and lexical items that occur in them, in relation with language use. The usage-based model, proposed by Langacker (1987), assumes that linguistic knowledge (grammar) is grounded in language use. However, the relation between the linguistic knowledge and usage has not been empirically tested. This study shows that semantic compatibility between linguistic elements is a gradient phenomenon, and that speakers’ knowledge about the degree of semantic compatibility is intimately correlated with language use, specifically frequency of use. To show this, I investigate linguistic knowledge of the semantic compatibility between the English ditransitive construction (DC) and various verbs that occur in the DC. I set up five semantic compatibility categories, and categorized various verbs according to the degree that the verb implies “successful transfer of possession” (Goldberg 1995). Then, I obtained frequency pattern of the verbs and the DC by using collexeme analysis (Stefanowitsch and Gries 2003), which is a method of measuring relative frequency of co-occurrences of a lexical item and a particular construction. I finally correlated the semantic compatibility of various verbs and the result of collexeme analysis. My findings specifically show that the more compatible a verb is with the construction, the more frequent it will be used in the construction. The empirical data support the assumption of the usage-based model that grammar and usage are closely related.
참고문헌 (28)
- Barlow, M, "MonoConc Pro. Version 2.2" (2004), Athelstan
- Bresnan, J, "Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English", Language, 86, pp.168~213 (2010)
- Bresnan, J, "The gradience of the dative alternation, In WeeReality Exploration and Discovery: Pattern Interaction in Language and Life", pp.161~184 (2009), CSLI Publications
- Fillmore, C. J, "Towards a frame-based organization of the lexicon: the semantics of RISK and its neighbors, In Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantics and Lexical Organization", pp.75~102 (1992), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Goldberg, A. E, "Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure" (1995), University of Chicago Press
- Goldberg, A. E, "Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language" (2006), Oxford University Press
- Functional Research, "Converging evidence II: more on the association of verbs and constructions, In mpirical and Experimental Methods in Cognitive", pp.2010, Gries, S. Th
- Hilpert, M, "Germanic Future Constructions A Usage-based Approach to Language Change" (2008), John Benjamins
- Israel, M, "The way constructions grow, In Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language", pp.217~230 (1996), CSLI
- Kemmer, S, "Constructional profiles as the basis of semantic analysis", presented at the meeting of New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics (2005), Croatia
- Kemmer, S, "New dimensions of dimensions: Frequency, productivity, domains and coercion", Presented at the meeting of Cognitive Linguistics Between Universality and Variation (2008), Croatia
- Kemmer, S, "Introduction: A usage-based conception of language, In Usage-based models of grammar, vii-xxviii" (2000), CSLI Publications
- Krifka, Manfred, "Semantic and Pragmatic conditions for the Dative Alternation", 영어학, 4(1), pp.1~31 (2004), 한국영어학회
- Langacker, R. W, "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar" (1987), Stanford University Press
- Langacker, R. W, "A usage-based model, In Topics in cognitive linguistics", pp.127~161 (1988), Benjamins
- Langacker, R. W, "Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction" (2008), Oxford University Press
- Michaelis, L. A, "Entity and event coercion in a symbolic theory of syntax, In Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions", pp.45~88 (2005), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Reddy, M, "The Conduit Metaphor. Metaphor and Thought", pp.284~324 (1979), Cambridge University Press
- Rosch, E, "Human Categorization, In Advances in Cross-Cultural Psychology 1", pp.1~72 (1977), Academic Press
- Pinango, M. M, "Time-course of semantic composition: The case of aspectual coercion", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, pp.233~244 (2006)
- Pinker, S, "Learnability and Cognition: the Acquisition of Argument Structure" (1989), The MIT Press
- Sinclair, J, "Collins Cobuild English Language Dictionary" (1987), Collins
- Sinclair, J, "Collins Cobuild English Dictionary for Advanced Learners, an electronic version" (2001), HarperCollins Publishers
- Stefanowitsch, A, "Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions", International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8, pp.209~243 (2003)
- Traugott, E. C, "The Concepts of Constructional Mismatch and Type-Shifting from the Perspective of Grammaticalization", Cognitive Linguistics, 18, pp.523~557 (2007)
- Traxler, M. J, "Coercion in sentence processing: evidence from eye-movements and self-paced reading", Journal of Memory and Language, 47, pp.530~547 (2002)
- Yoon, S, "Constructions, Semantic Compatibility, and Coercion: An Empirical Usage-based Approach", 박사, pp.2012
- Ziegeler, D, "A word of caution on coercion", Journal of Pragmatics, 39, pp.990~1028 (2007)