본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A functional account for the productivity of English -er nominals

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper offers a descriptive generalization on the English -er nominalization based on a functional-cognitive-semantic concept habituality as a condition on -er nominalization. Fairly an extensive literature on this topic has so far been offered in terms of syntactic structures, particularly arguments structure of the base verbs. Many of these research works do shed a new light on the various facets of English -er nominalization, but still missing from these discussions is a comprehensive understanding of the phenomena revolving around these nominalizations. These works simply exclude from their discussion the -er nominals that are derived from nouns, adjectives, prepositions, and various phrases simply because they do not involve argument structure. Various proposals couched in functional-semantic framework offer a comprehensive account for this phenomenon. Our proposal is an effort in this line of approach. We argue that -er nominalization is allowed if habituality or durativity is secured enough to be considered as representing inherent properties.

Abstract

This paper offers a descriptive generalization on the English -er nominalization based on a functional-cognitive-semantic concept habituality as a condition on -er nominalization. Fairly an extensive literature on this topic has so far been offered in terms of syntactic structures, particularly arguments structure of the base verbs. Many of these research works do shed a new light on the various facets of English -er nominalization, but still missing from these discussions is a comprehensive understanding of the phenomena revolving around these nominalizations. These works simply exclude from their discussion the -er nominals that are derived from nouns, adjectives, prepositions, and various phrases simply because they do not involve argument structure. Various proposals couched in functional-semantic framework offer a comprehensive account for this phenomenon. Our proposal is an effort in this line of approach. We argue that -er nominalization is allowed if habituality or durativity is secured enough to be considered as representing inherent properties.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Alexiadou, Artemis, "Instrument subjects are agents or causers", Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp.40~48 (2006), Cascadilla Proceedings Project
  2. Alexiadou, Artemis, "Nominalizations across languages and frameworks", pp.9~38 (2010), Mouton de Gruyter
  3. Baker, Mark, "On agent nominalizations", Language, 85(3), pp.517~556 (2009)
  4. Barker, Chris, "Episodic-ee in English. A thematic role constraint on new word formation", Language, 74, pp.695~727 (1998)
  5. Bengtsson, Elna, "Passive nouns with a concrete sense in English" (1927), Häkan Ohlsson
  6. Borer, Hagit, "Structuring sense. volume III: Taking form" (2013), Oxford University Press
  7. Bowers, John, "Non-event nominals and argument structure", Lingua, 121, pp.1194~1206 (2011)
  8. Burzio, Luigi, "Italian syntax: A government-binding approach" (1986), Reidel
  9. Chomsky, Noam, "Readings in English Transformational Grammar", pp.184~221 (1970), Blaisdell
  10. Cohen, Ariel, "Habituals, -er nominals, and modality. Abstract" (2005), Ben-Gurion University
  11. Grimshaw, Jane, "Argument structure" (1990), The MIT Press
  12. Härtl, Holden, "HSK word-formation:An international handbook of the languages of Europe" (2015), Mouton de Gruyter
  13. Heyvaert, Liesbet, "Attenders or attendees? Deverbal -ee and -er variants in English", Journal of Pragmatics, 43, pp.62~72 (2011)
  14. Jespersen, Otto, "A modern English grammar on historical principles, vol. 5" (1905), George Allen and Unwin
  15. Kastovsky, D, "The Old English suffix -er(e)", Anglia, 89, pp.285~325 (1971)
  16. Levin, Beth, "Non-event -er nominals. A probe into argument structure", Linguistics, 26, pp.1067~1083 (1988)
  17. Lieber, Rochelle, "Handbook of word-formation", pp.375~427 (2005), Springer
  18. Marchand, Hans, "The categories and types of Present-Day English word-formation. A synchronic-diachronic approach" (1969), C.H. Beck
  19. McIntyre, Andrew, "Constraining argument structure in nominalizations: The case English -er", Lingua, 141, pp.121~138 (2014)
  20. Panther, Klaus-Uwe, "Applied cognitive linguistics: language pedagogy", pp.149~200 (2001), Mouton
  21. Rappaport Hovav, Malka, "Syntax and Semantics vol. 26: Syntax and the Lexicon", pp.127~153 (1992), Academic Press
  22. Roeper, Thomas, "Yearbook of Morphology", pp.187~228 (1988), Foris
  23. Ryder, Mary Ellen, "Mixers, mufflers and mousers. The extendings of the -er suffix as a case of prototype reanalysis", Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 7, pp.299~311 (1991)
  24. Ryder, Mary Ellen, "Bankers and blue-chippers: An account of -er formations in Present-day English", English Language and Linguistics, 3, pp.269~297 (1999)
  25. Scherer, Carmen, "Diachronic word formation: -er nominals in German" (2005), Johannes Gutenberg-Unversität
  26. van Hout, Angeliek, "Events and aspectual structure in derivational morphology", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 32, pp.175~220 (1998), The MIT Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)