본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

-ee derivatives in English: Focusing on dual role of -ee suffix

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This paper argues three things : (a) -ee is morphological counterpart of syntactic passive morpheme -ed, following Oegglie(1988). Unlike -ed, -ee is supposed to do a dual job for deriving words such as sittee, whose base verb is stative and intransitive. -ee must absorb an external theta role only when there is any internal theta role, resulting in deriving a word to denote a person or a thing that undergoes passivity such as advisee, while -ee can not do so when there is none, (b) -ee English suffix is not sensitive to the transitivity of verb, but to the feasibility of having a dynamic sense of verb, which is acting as a base to -ee. It is because there are many -ee derivatives whose bases are intransitive verbs such as arrivee, and (c) the monopolic status of -ee in English for derivatives with patient reading is likely to lead over-generation, which is assumed to be inevitable for the sake of fewer constraints on -ee of our analysis compared to those of the previous ones and the over-generated possible -ee derivatives are subject to pragmatic contexts for their existence in actual speech community. The pragmatic context is to be assumed to function as a filter in the sense of Halle (1974) in order to allow over-generation of -ee suffix.

Abstract

This paper argues three things : (a) -ee is morphological counterpart of syntactic passive morpheme -ed, following Oegglie(1988). Unlike -ed, -ee is supposed to do a dual job for deriving words such as sittee, whose base verb is stative and intransitive. -ee must absorb an external theta role only when there is any internal theta role, resulting in deriving a word to denote a person or a thing that undergoes passivity such as advisee, while -ee can not do so when there is none, (b) -ee English suffix is not sensitive to the transitivity of verb, but to the feasibility of having a dynamic sense of verb, which is acting as a base to -ee. It is because there are many -ee derivatives whose bases are intransitive verbs such as arrivee, and (c) the monopolic status of -ee in English for derivatives with patient reading is likely to lead over-generation, which is assumed to be inevitable for the sake of fewer constraints on -ee of our analysis compared to those of the previous ones and the over-generated possible -ee derivatives are subject to pragmatic contexts for their existence in actual speech community. The pragmatic context is to be assumed to function as a filter in the sense of Halle (1974) in order to allow over-generation of -ee suffix.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. Aarts, Bas, "English Syntax and Argumentation" (2008), Palgrave Macmillan
  2. Allen, Margaret, "Morphological Investigations", 박사, pp.1978
  3. Anderson, J. M, "Linguistic Representation" (1992), Mouton De Gruyter
  4. Aronoff, Mark, "The semantics of -ship suffixation", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.167~173 (2001)
  5. Barker, Christopher, "Episodic -ee in English: a thematic role constraint on a new word-formation", Language, 74, pp.695~727 (1998)
  6. Bauer, Laurie, "-ee by Gum", American Speech, 62, pp.315~319 (1987)
  7. Bauer, Laurie, "More -ee words", American Speech, 68, pp.222~224 (1993)
  8. Bauer, Laurie, "English Morphology" (2013), Oxford University Press
  9. Greenbaum, S, "Grammar of the English Grammar" (2013), Longman
  10. Levin, Beth, "Non-event -er nominals: a probe into argument structure", Linguistics, 26, pp.1067~1083 (1988)
  11. Lieber, Rochelle, "Introducing morphology" (2009), Cambridge University Press
  12. Jaeggil, Osvaido. A, "Passive", pp.587~622 (1986), Linguistic Inquiry
  13. Hohenhaus, Peter, "Handbook of Word- Formation" (2005), Springer
  14. Moravcsik. E, "An Introduction to Syntax" (2006), Continuum
  15. Plag, Ingo, "Word-Formation" (2003), Cambridge Press
  16. Rappoport Hovav, Malka, "Syntax and Semantics. vol 26: Syntax and the lexicon", pp.27~153 (1992), Academic Press
  17. Ryder, Mary Ellen, "Bankers and blue-chippers: an account of -er formations in Present-day English", English Language and Linguistics, 3, pp.269~297 (1999)
  18. Spencer, Andrew, "Yearbook of Morphology", pp.73~102 (1998), Kluwer Academic Press
  19. Stekauer, P, "Handbook of Word-Formation" (2005), Netherlands

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)