A Construction Morphology Analysis of Old English Genuine and Pseudo Synthetic Nominal Compounds: Schema Unification and Motivation
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The main goal of this study is twofold. The first goal is to provide a Construction Morphology (CxM) analysis of OE [N N] Synthetic Nominal Compounds ([N V SF/-Ø ] N SNCs), which may exhibit two internal structures ([[N V] V SF ] N vs. [N [V SF ] N ] N ) similar to the SNCs in Present-day English (PDE). Within the theoretical framework of ‘Word-based’ CxM (Booij 2010, Booij and Audring 2018), this study claims that OE [N V SF/-Ø ] N SNCs can be seen as constructions consisting of two schemas for [N V] V verbal compounds (VCs) and [V SF/-Ø ] N deverba l nouns (DNs), a nd tha t the forma tion of OE SNCs ca n be better understood by assuming that the two schemas can be unified into one abstract schema for OE SNCs ([[N i V j ] Vk SF/-Ø ] Nm ↔ [Entity/Action/Resultant with ARGUMENT relation to SEM k ] m ). The second goal is to propose that the four types of OE [[N V] V SF/-Ø ] N SNCs classified in this study receive full motivation from the unified abstract schema for OE [[N V] V SF/-Ø ] N SNCs, and that the four type SNCs receive partial and multiple motivation from the three schemas for DNs, VCs, and base verbs, with which the four type SNCs are paradigmatically and systematically connected. A CxM analysis of OE SNCs has two important advantages that the possibility of making a generalization of OE SNCs, and that the unnecessariness of determining one ‘correct’ internal structure between two plausible ones.
Abstract
The main goal of this study is twofold. The first goal is to provide a Construction Morphology (CxM) analysis of OE [N N] Synthetic Nominal Compounds ([N V SF/-Ø ] N SNCs), which may exhibit two internal structures ([[N V] V SF ] N vs. [N [V SF ] N ] N ) similar to the SNCs in Present-day English (PDE). Within the theoretical framework of ‘Word-based’ CxM (Booij 2010, Booij and Audring 2018), this study claims that OE [N V SF/-Ø ] N SNCs can be seen as constructions consisting of two schemas for [N V] V verbal compounds (VCs) and [V SF/-Ø ] N deverba l nouns (DNs), a nd tha t the forma tion of OE SNCs ca n be better understood by assuming that the two schemas can be unified into one abstract schema for OE SNCs ([[N i V j ] Vk SF/-Ø ] Nm ↔ [Entity/Action/Resultant with ARGUMENT relation to SEM k ] m ). The second goal is to propose that the four types of OE [[N V] V SF/-Ø ] N SNCs classified in this study receive full motivation from the unified abstract schema for OE [[N V] V SF/-Ø ] N SNCs, and that the four type SNCs receive partial and multiple motivation from the three schemas for DNs, VCs, and base verbs, with which the four type SNCs are paradigmatically and systematically connected. A CxM analysis of OE SNCs has two important advantages that the possibility of making a generalization of OE SNCs, and that the unnecessariness of determining one ‘correct’ internal structure between two plausible ones.
참고문헌 (17)
- Baugh, A. C., "A History of the English Language" (2002), Routledge
- Booij, G., "Morphology and Modularity. In Honour of HenkSchultink", pp.57~74 (1988), Foris Publications
- Booij, G., "The Oxford Handbook of Compounding", pp.201~216 (2009), Oxford University Press
- Booij, G., "Construction Morphology" (2010), Oxford University Press
- Booij, G, "The Construction of Words: Advances in Construction Morphology", pp.59~80 (2018), Springer
- "Anglo-Saxon Dictionary" (2010)[URL]
- Fabb, N., "The Handbook of Morphology", pp.66~83 (2001), Blackwell
- Hall, J. R. C., "A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary" (1916), Macmillan
- Hogg, R. M., "An Introduction to Old English" (2002), Oxford University Press
- Kastovsky, D., "The Cambridge History of the English Language: Volume 1 The Beginnings to 1066", pp.290~408 (1992), Cambridge University Press
- Kastovsky, D., "The Handbook of the History of English", pp.151~176 (2006), Blackwell
- Lass, R., "Old English. A Historical Linguistic Companion" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Lieber, R., "Morphology and Lexical Semantics" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Lieber, R. 2009, "Handbook of Compounding", pp.357~369 (2009), Oxford University Press
- Marchand, H., "The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word Formation" (1969), Beck
- 박수진, "A Descriptive and Statistical Analysis of Old English Compounds", 영어학연구, 24(1), pp.17~56 (2018), 한국영어학학회[DOI]
- 박수진, "A Constructional Analysis of Old English Nominal Compounds", 영어학연구, 24(3), pp.1~45 (2018), 한국영어학학회[DOI]