본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparative Analysis of Competitiveness of Logistics Companies in Korea, Japan and China

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper examines the comparative corporate performance of logistics companies in Korea, China and Japan. Based on the annual data from the listed companies, the growth rate of Chinese companies has surpassed that of Korean and Japanese companies and has labeled China as the fastest growing economy. How ever, labor efficiency of Chinese firms when calculated by total revenue per employee is the lowest of the three countries. In addition, the profitability of Chinese multimodal logistics companies and sea transport companies is also lower than that of Korea and Japan. Using Data Envelop Analysis(DEA), the primary results regarding corporate efficiency among Korean, Chinese and Japanese logistic companies are as follows: In the multimodal industries, Japanese firms have revealed the highest level of efficiency, with Korean firms coming in second, and Chinese firms ranking third with distinctly inferior performance. This trend has also been examined in the maritime industries, in which the efficiency levels have been deteriorating continuously. However, in the air transportation industry Chinese companies revealed the highest level of efficiency, which resulted from the business characteristics of the government supported conglomerate companies.

Abstract

This paper examines the comparative corporate performance of logistics companies in Korea, China and Japan. Based on the annual data from the listed companies, the growth rate of Chinese companies has surpassed that of Korean and Japanese companies and has labeled China as the fastest growing economy. How ever, labor efficiency of Chinese firms when calculated by total revenue per employee is the lowest of the three countries. In addition, the profitability of Chinese multimodal logistics companies and sea transport companies is also lower than that of Korea and Japan. Using Data Envelop Analysis(DEA), the primary results regarding corporate efficiency among Korean, Chinese and Japanese logistic companies are as follows: In the multimodal industries, Japanese firms have revealed the highest level of efficiency, with Korean firms coming in second, and Chinese firms ranking third with distinctly inferior performance. This trend has also been examined in the maritime industries, in which the efficiency levels have been deteriorating continuously. However, in the air transportation industry Chinese companies revealed the highest level of efficiency, which resulted from the business characteristics of the government supported conglomerate companies.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. Banker, R.D, "Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiences in data envelop analysis", Management Science, 30, pp.1078~1092 (1984)
  2. Charnes, A, "Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units", European Journal of Operation Research, 2, pp.429~444 (1978)
  3. Cullinane, Kevin, "The container shipping industry and the impact of China's accession to the WTO", Research in Transportation Economics, 12, pp.221~245 (2004)
  4. Fritsch, B, "Measuring the contribution of local infrastructure to economic development in France in The econometrics of major transport infrastructure", Macmillan, London
  5. Holz, Carsten A, "Long live China's state owned enterprises: deflating - the myth of poor financial performance", Journal of Asian Economics, 13, pp.493~529 (2002)
  6. Hong, Junjie, "Transport and the location of foreign logistics firms: The Chinese experience", Transportation Research Part A, 41, pp.597~609 (2007)
  7. Earnings Management and Tunneling through Related Party Transactions, "Jian, M.", Evidence from Chinese Corporate Groups, Working Paper, ~ (2006)
  8. Kessides, C, "A review of infrastructure's impact on economic development in Infrastructure and the complexity of economic Development Chapter12", pp.213~230 (1996)
  9. Liu, Chiung-Lin, "An Analysis of third-party logistics performance and service provision", Transportation Research Part E, 47, pp.547~570 (2011)
  10. Liu, Wei Min, "Reform and opening up: Way to the sustainable and harmonious development of air transport in China", Transport policy, 16, pp.215~223 (2009)
  11. 호세통존, "Causal nexus between the transport and logistics sector and trade: The case of Australia", TRANSPORT POLICY, 17, pp.135~146, ELSEVIER SCI LTD
  12. Panayides, Photis, M, "The Relative efficiency of shipping companies", Transportation Research Part E, 47, pp.681~694 (2011)
  13. Qi, Daqing, "Shareholding structure and corporate performance of partially privatized firms: Evidence from listed Chinese companies", Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 8, pp.587~610 (2000)
  14. 호세통존, "China's economic rise and its implications for logistics: The Australian case", TRANSPORT POLICY, 16, pp.224~231, ELSEVIER SCI LTD
  15. Wu, Yen-Chun Jim, "Container port efficiency in emerging and more advanced markets", Transportation Research Part E, 46, pp.1030~1042 (2010)
  16. Charnes, A, "Measuring the efficiency of decisionmaking units", European Journal of Operation Research, 2, pp.429~444 (1978)
  17. Banker, R.D, "Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiences in data envelop analysis", Management Science, 30, pp.1078~1092 (1984)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)