虚假诉讼之识别
Identifying False Litigation
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
近年来，借助诉讼谋取非法利益的虚假诉讼现象增长趋势明显，一些当事人利用法律上的漏洞，双方恶意串通，借助诉权这种形式，通过民事诉讼的合法程序，骗取法院、仲裁机构生效法律文书，谋取非法利益，受到损害的第三人的合法权益无法获得有效的救济。为遏制这种现象，保护案外第三人合法权益，2012年8月修订的《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》增设了第三人撤销之诉制度。本文从虚假诉讼特点入手，探讨虚假诉讼的识别标准，分析虚假诉讼的识别难点与解决对策，以期对防止、制裁虚假诉讼行为有所裨益
Abstract
Recently, false litigation whereby litigants attempt to obtain illegal benefits from litigations has been increasing. Those litigants, who utilise the legal loophole in civil litigation procedure and maliciously collude so as to obtain legal documents from courts and arbitral tribunals, gain illegal proceeds. As a result, a third parties’ interests may be at risk and unable to be legally protected. To curb this illegal activity, the Chinese Civil Procedure was amended in August 2012 to insert a provision for a third-party with draw al procedure. This paper investigates the characteristics of false litigations and discusse show to identify/detect a false a litigation. Further, it an alyses the difficulties and responses relating to false litigation in order to be able to prevent and penalise such illegal activities.
참고문헌 (7)
- 胡军辉, "论第三人撤销之诉", 政治与法律, 5 (2007)
- 江伟, "民事诉讼法典专家修改建议稿及立法理由" (2008), 法律出版社
- 李浩, "民事诉讼法学" (2011), 法律出版社
- 奚晓明, "中华人民共和国民事诉讼法 修改条文理解与适用", pp.102~ (2012), 人民法院出版社
- 李浩, "虚假诉讼恶意调解问题研究", 江海学刊, 1 (2012)
- 王福华, "第三人撤销之诉适用研究", 清华法学, 4 (2013)
- 张艳, "我国第三人撤销之诉制度在司法实践中出现的问题与完善对策", 政治与法律, 6 (2014)