Abuse of Process and Regulation in Commercial Arbitration – A Chinese Perspective
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper discusses the problem of extraordinary delay in the commercial arbitration process, increased arbitration fees, and denial of the benefits of arbitration to other parties due to the abuse of procedural rights by relevant parties in commercial arbitration process. This paper proposes measures to reduce abuse of process in commercial arbitration, such as statutory modification, judicial supervision, amendment of arbitration rules and the intervention of disciplinary bodies.
Abstract
This paper discusses the problem of extraordinary delay in the commercial arbitration process, increased arbitration fees, and denial of the benefits of arbitration to other parties due to the abuse of procedural rights by relevant parties in commercial arbitration process. This paper proposes measures to reduce abuse of process in commercial arbitration, such as statutory modification, judicial supervision, amendment of arbitration rules and the intervention of disciplinary bodies.
참고문헌 (16)
- Lawrence W. Newman, "AAA Yearbook on Arbitration and the Law" (2012), Juris Net, LLC
- Lu Song, "Evidence in International Commercial Arbitration", Beijing Arbitration, 2 (2014)
- Ma Zhihua, "Research on the Procedural Orders in the International Commercial Arbitration and the Necessity of Introducing it into the Arbitration System in China", Beijing Arbitration, 2 (2014)
- Michele Taruffo, "Abuse of Procedural Right: Comparative Standards of Procedural Fairness", Jin Ling Law Review, 1 (2007)
- Yasuhei Taniguchi, "Litigation and Justice of Proceedings, translated by Wang Yaxin and Liu Rongjun" (2002), China University of Political Science and Law Press
- Zhao Xiuwen, "International Commercial Arbitration Law", China Renmin University Press
- Alan Redfern, "Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration" (2004)
- Bernardo M. Cremades, "Good Faith in International Arbitration", American University International Law Review, 27(4), pp.761~788 (2012)
- E. Allan Farnsworth, "Duties of Good Faith and Fair Dealing under the UNIDROIT Principles, Relevant Conventions and National Laws", Tul. J. Int'l & Comp. L, 3 (1995)
- "Recent Developments - The Uniform Arbitration Act" (1987)[URL]
- Juan Eduardo Figueroa Valdes, "The Principle of Kompetenz-Kompetenz in International Commercial Arbitration", Mealey's Int’l Arb. RPT, ~ (2007)
- Julie Bédard, "Arbitrating in Good Faith and Protecting the Integrity of the Arbitral Process", Paris J. of Int’l Arb (2010)
- L. Ali Khan, "Arbitral Autonomy", La. L. Rev, 74 (2013)
- Nana Japaridze, "Fair Enough? Reconciling the Pursuit of Fairness and Justice with Preserving the Nature of International Commercial Arbitration", Hofstra Law Review, 36(4), pp.13~
- Otto Sandrock, "The UK Supreme Court Misses the Point: Estoppel Applies Without the Existence of a Common Intention", Am. Rev. Int’l Arb, 23, pp.175~
- Thomas W. Wälde, "Arbitration under International Investment Agreements" (2010)