본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Effect of Overconfident Managers on Pay-for-Performance Sensitivity

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

This study examines how overconfident managers influence their pay-for-performance sensitivity in South Korea. We use a sample of 14,012 firm-year observations from 2011 to 2020 listed in KOSPI and KOSDAQ. This study uses regression analysis to analyze the data, with firm size as a robustness check. We find a negative and significant relationship between managerial overconfidence and pay-for-performance sensitivity, suggesting that overconfident managers can play a significant role in deteriorating efficient compensation contracts. This result is consistent with prior studies’ findings that managerial overconfidence can increase the agency costs between shareholders and managers. In addition, we find that the effect of managerial overconfidence on pay-for-performance sensitivity is more pronounced when overconfident managers are in large-sized firms. This paper contributes to prior studies in the following ways. First, this study confirms the relationship between managerial overconfidence and pay-for-performance sensitivity. Second, it expands prior studies related to pay-for-performance sensitivity and managerial overconfidence. Third, the effect of managerial overconfidence on pay-for-performance sensitivity affected by firm size should be carefully considered. Lastly, the results of this study indicate that managerial overconfidence should be managed effectively to create compensation contracts that are related to a firm’s performance.

Abstract

This study examines how overconfident managers influence their pay-for-performance sensitivity in South Korea. We use a sample of 14,012 firm-year observations from 2011 to 2020 listed in KOSPI and KOSDAQ. This study uses regression analysis to analyze the data, with firm size as a robustness check. We find a negative and significant relationship between managerial overconfidence and pay-for-performance sensitivity, suggesting that overconfident managers can play a significant role in deteriorating efficient compensation contracts. This result is consistent with prior studies’ findings that managerial overconfidence can increase the agency costs between shareholders and managers. In addition, we find that the effect of managerial overconfidence on pay-for-performance sensitivity is more pronounced when overconfident managers are in large-sized firms. This paper contributes to prior studies in the following ways. First, this study confirms the relationship between managerial overconfidence and pay-for-performance sensitivity. Second, it expands prior studies related to pay-for-performance sensitivity and managerial overconfidence. Third, the effect of managerial overconfidence on pay-for-performance sensitivity affected by firm size should be carefully considered. Lastly, the results of this study indicate that managerial overconfidence should be managed effectively to create compensation contracts that are related to a firm’s performance.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Ahmed, A., "Managerial Overconfidence and Accounting Conservatism", Journal of Accounting Research, 51(1), pp.1~30 (2013)
  2. Ahn, Y. S., "CEO Overconfidence and Pay-for-Performance Sensitivity", Korean Accounting Journal, 32(2), pp.151~182 (2023)
  3. Baik, I., "The Effect of Firm Size on K-IFRS : From Managers’ Pay-for-Performance Sensitivity View", Korean Business Education Review, 38(2), pp.1~17 (2023)
  4. Bebchuk, L., "Pay without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation" (2004), Harvard University Press
  5. Ben-David, I., "Managerial Miscalibration", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(4), pp.1547~1584 (2013)
  6. Cao, J., "Do Venture Capitalists Play a Monitoring Role in an Emerging Market? Evidence from the Pay-Performance Relationship of Chinese Entrepreneurial Firms", Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 29, pp.121~145 (2014)
  7. Chen, G., "Does Nepotism Run in the Family? CEO Pay and Pay-Performance Sensitivity in Indian Family Firms", Strategic Management Journal, 42(7), pp.1326~1343 (2021)
  8. Cichello, M., "The Impact of Firm Size on Pay-Performance Sensitivities", Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(4), pp.609~627 (2005)
  9. Cordeiro, L, "Managerial Overconfidence and Dividend Policy", ~ (2009)
  10. Galariotis, E., "Agency Cost of Debt and Inside Debt : The Role of CEO Overconfidence", British Journal of Management, 34(3), pp.1606~1631 (2023)
  11. Gao, H., "A Comparison of CEO Pay-Performance Sensitivity in Privately-Held and Public Firms", Journal of Corporate Finance, 35, pp.370~388 (2015)
  12. Gao, Y., "Effect of Managerial Overconfidence on Corporate Credit Ratings", Korea International Accounting Review, 96, pp.1~21 (2021)
  13. Gervais, S., "Overconfidence, Compensation Contracts, and Capital Budgeting", Journal of Finance, 66(5), pp.1735~1777 (2011)
  14. Gul, F., "Corporate Social Responsibility, Overconfident CEOs and Empire Building: Agency and Stakeholder Theoretic Perspective", Journal of Business Research, 111, pp.52~68 (2020)
  15. Hamouche, S., "Human Resource Management and the COVID-19 Crisis : Implications, Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Organizational Directions", Journal of Management and Organization, 29(5), pp.799~814 (2023)
  16. Hribar, P., "CEO Overconfidence and Management Forecasting", Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(1), pp.204~227 (2016)
  17. Humphery-Jenner, M., "Executive Overconfidence and Compensation Structure", Journal of Financial Economics, 119(3), pp.533~558 (2016)
  18. Jensen, M. C., "Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives", Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), pp.225~264 (1990)
  19. Jensen, M. C., "Theory of the Firm : Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure", Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), pp.305~360 (1976)
  20. Kim, S., "The Effect of CSR Activities on Management Risk and Information Asymmetry, and the Differentiated Recognition of Debtholders: A Comparison between Large and Small-Medium Companies", Study on Accounting, Taxation and Auditing, 60(3), pp.237~274 (2018)
  21. Liao, T., "Environmental Risk Exposure and Executive Pay-for-Performance Sensitivity", Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 83, pp.102200~ (2024)
  22. Malmendier, U., "Who Makes Acquisitions? CEO Overconfidence and the Market's Reaction", Journal of Financial Economics, 89(1), pp.20~43 (2008)
  23. Malmendier, U., "Overconfidence and Early-Life Experiences : The Effect of Managerial Traits on Corporate Financial Policies", Journal of Finance, 66(5), pp.1687~1733 (2011)
  24. Mitra, S., "Managerial Overconfidence, Ability, Firm-Governance and Audit Fees", Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 52, pp.841~870 (2019)
  25. Ozkan, N., "CEO Compensation and Firm Performance : An Empirical Investigation of UK Panel Data", European Financial Management, 17(2), pp.260~285 (2011)
  26. Presley, T., "CEO Overconfidence and the Incidence of Financial Restatement", Advances in Accounting, 29(1), pp.74~84 (2013)
  27. Schrand, C., "Executive Overconfidence and the Slippery Slope to Financial Misreporting", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1-2), pp.311~329 (2012)
  28. Wu, W., "Institutional Investors' Corporate Site Visits and Pay-Performance Sensitivity", Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 76, pp.101875~ (2022)
  29. Yang, D., "Managerial Overconfidence and Manipulation of Operating Cash Flow : Evidence from Korea", Finance Research Letters, 32, pp.101343~ (2020)
  30. Zhang, D., "Institutional Investors, Controlling Shareholders and CEO Pay-Performance Relationship : Evidence from China", Accounting and Finance, 61(1), pp.467~498 (2021)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)