일재 이항의 이기론에 대한 후학들의 오해

Abstract

This article is written in order to review a comparative approach to Lee Hang’s the theory of Liqi(理氣). His theory as well as evaluation of future reference to achieve this goal, a comprehensive assessment should also analyze. The motivation for writing the article are as follows: First, there is a problem with the approach to his theory. Second, some of the assessment is not a few of the future reference his theory be a misunderstanding. Third, if a misunderstanding occurs as a reason not to find a proper interpretation of his criticism theory becomes impossible. To clarify the misunderstanding of the future reference of the his theory of Li(理) and Qi(氣) should be Yiti(一體) and Yiwu(一物) analyzed from any concept. Should also review the analysis and interpretation of contemporary Confucian scholars of the Joseon era. The success of these two studies lies in comparison with Zhu-xi’s the theory of Liqi(理氣). Problem arise in the process of comparison the theory of Liqi(理氣). The bigger problem, but a problem for excessive assessment is that after his theory of Liqi(理氣) provisions of the Zhu-xi. His theory of Liqi(理氣) a logical fallacy, resolve the exaggerated facts like it. Place clothed cause a bubble or do not fit the body like as starting. This approach will only be a failure to understand the theory of Lee Hang’s. Some of the details of the issue is caused by a lack of rigor terms. Also it will occur because they do not seriously consider the condition to be equipped to become one of the words is suitably used. This also is a factor that makes the theory of his misunderstood. Reducing the clothes may cause the following. First, Yiti(一體) and Yiwu(一物) are the core of his theory. The theory of Liqi(理氣) is limited to phenomenology. Narrowed the scope of the discussion; Reduction of the Zhu-xi’s theory. Second, empirical, theoretical, and focused on the sensory dimension; Specialization of the Zhu-xi’s theory.